Skip to main content
michalm2800
Participant
June 1, 2023
Answered

What is wrong with the quality of this picture? 0.o

The photo is sharp, clear, not overexposed, and not underexposed. It is about the building in the background?  Are humans always responsible for checking the overview, or do algorithm's sometimes perform this task?

This topic is closed to new replies. Start a new post to keep the conversation going.
Nancy OShea
Nancy OSheaCorrect answer
Community Expert
June 2, 2023

IP is a separate rejection reason.  Adobe Stock reviewers select only one rejection reason per submission -- the first one they see. 

 

If an asset was rejected for quality, you can be certain there are quality problems, even if you don't see them. 

 

Nancy O'Shea— Product User & Community Expert
View reply

9 replies

Ricky336
Community Expert
Ricky336Community Expert
Community Expert
June 2, 2023

Hello,

Actually, the photo isn't that 'sharp', distortion is an issue with the building, and there are enough reasons to reject this without using a bot!

The composition could be improved a lot as well!

Translate
    Nancy OShea
    Community Expert
    Nancy OSheaCommunity Expert
    Community Expert
    June 1, 2023

    Also check your white balance. 

     

    Translate
    Nancy O'Shea— Product User & Community Expert
      Abambo
      Community Expert
      AbamboCommunity Expert
      Community Expert
      June 1, 2023

      Humans did reject this for reason. In your case it is chromatic aberration.

      There may be other issues, however, like framing, exposure etc.

       

      I suspect the final refusal would be IP, as this is an isolated building and there are some (distorted) signs visible, that may or may not be of disturbance.

      Translate
      ABAMBO | Hard- and Software Engineer | Photographer
        michalm2800Author
        Participant
        June 2, 2023

        Yes I have overlooked this hidden 😉 chromatic aberration. However the exposure is perfect and the sharpness after minor adjustments, should be impeccable. The main issue is indeed intellectual property rights — because I have this technical issue refuse to other photos (without any technical=really technical issues – like this aberration :). Does the same law apply to building fragments? I have removed distinctive signs and inscriptions. What exactly does the law say in this matter? Should be there no information about legal rights issue instead of technical issue?

        Translate
        Jill_C
        Community Expert
        Jill_CCommunity Expert
        Community Expert
        June 2, 2023

        The Moderator can only choose one rejection reason code, so they choose the first one they see. Thus, it's quite possible that an image rejected for technical issues ALSO has IP issues. There is no comprehensive list of buildings that might require property releases. 

        Translate
        Jill C., Forum Volunteer
        Terms & ConditionsAccessibility statement
        Using the community Terms of use Privacy Cookie preferences Do not sell or share my personal information ad choicesAdChoices