Known Participant

Answered

Why is this picture rejected

Forum|Forum|4 years ago
October 13, 2021
5 replies
1466 views

i have no idea why this is rejected. only adobe stock rejected this.

is adobe stock pixel peeping photos and rejecting them?

This topic has been closed for replies.

Correct answer Ricky336

hi. this is a photo accepted. taken on same time and place.

can you give me your thought on how this is better than rejected one?

i comparing 2 photos and i have no idea. im trying to find good things that are only in the accepted photo and not in rejected one and use the knowledge to pick the good photos i have.

thanks.

Better composition! The exposure is more balanced as well. Your first photo the composition is not so good, the moon is too much of a bright spot and I don't think it has much commercial value!

T

Test Screen Name

Legend

I had to look up "pixel peeping". One definition is "Pixel peeping is when you view your images at 100% or greater magnification." To which the answer is - of COURSE Adobe are doing this, because it's what their customers do to check quality. World class commercial photography must be perfect at 100%.

jacquelingphoto2017

Community Expert

Hi @Sejin.___.Bears ,

It is beautiful. There is, however, color fringing at the top of the wall. It is underexposed - not enough details in the shadows. Also the subject is not completely sharp. The composition is not good. You could include a little more of the building.

I also observe writing on the building. That could be an IP issue.

Best wishes

JG

Photographer and Nutrition Author

Nancy OShea

Community Expert

Adobe Stock customers expect to find high quality full scale images for use in professional projects. With that in mind, I'm not sure what commercial value this would have for Stock customers. It's underexposed, tilted and the moon is microscopic and blurry.

Nancy O'Shea— Product User & Community Expert

RALPH_L

Community Expert

There are a few reasons I can see.

The moon is overexposed with no details.

The structure's shadows are underexposed.

There is too much empty space (the sky) with no details.

The scene is poorly cropped.

I think this would have come over better:

S

Sejin.___.BearsAuthor

Known Participant

hello. thanks for comment.

i like to darken(underexpose) parts i dont want to stand out. its just my style.

do you think this kind of personal style be a problem for uploading on adobestock in the future?

should i look for better stockimage site?

(sorry if my english is not good)

RALPH_L

Community Expert

A better stockimgae site? Let me know if you find one.

Under exposed and overexposed areas in photos contain no details.

When enlarged and printed these appear as blotches in the prints. No reputable customer wants these

in purchased photos. In small prints you might get away with it however in a good stock agency these photos will be refused.

As a photographger, the correct approach is to crop out or blur the parts you do not want to emphasize in the photo. This is called "composing your photo". This can be done "in camera" or in post processing.

Ricky336

Community Expert

Hello,

Can you give the rejection reason that came with the email? Did it say 'Technical issues?'

You DO need to inspect at 100% or more to see problems with the file. Remember that files are not only used for small screen viewing but also for large prints. This where the defects can become noticeable like noise, artifacts, incorrect exposure etc.

Have a read of this. It's a brief guide on image quality:
https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/help/quality-and-technical-issues.html

S

Sejin.___.BearsAuthor

Known Participant

i didnt get email but it does say it has 'Technical issues'

Sign up

To post, reply, or follow discussions, please sign in with your Adobe ID.

Sign in to Adobe Community

To post, reply, or follow discussions, please sign in with your Adobe ID.

Scanning file for viruses.

This file cannot be downloaded