Skip to main content
Yamuna Gita
Known Participant
December 21, 2024
Answered

why these images were rejected due to Quality Issues. what's wrong

  • December 21, 2024
  • 4 replies
  • 1732 views

very curious why these images were rejected due to poor quality. what's wrong??

attached the image below

This topic has been closed for replies.
Correct answer Abambo
quote

Sorry, but I disagree. Rejecting image because the hole in the belt is bad is some kind of nonsense.


By @Yamuna Gita

Well, some moderators do not see the flaws, but the buyer will see them, if they are important to him. 

 

Just looking at the belt, I see multiple rendering errors and a lot of compression artefacts, and each of those would be a rejection for cause. In addition the white points are probably more disturbing than doing good.

It's not because it's generative AI that the buyer needs to accept errors in the picture. But I agree that many buyers would use the picture without an issue and depending on the use it could be perfectly fine. The catalogues are full of bad assets (both generative AI and badly edited, or both together). But if you submit this asset to stock, it needs to be better than this. It may be perfectly suited for use on your homepage, however.

4 replies

jacquelingphoto2017
Community Expert
Community Expert
December 22, 2024

Hi @Yamuna Gita ,

The first image has on two right foot shoes.

The red ribbon does not go completely across

It appears the ribbon does not go down the entire side of the gift but makes an angle at the side. The top gift bow did not form correctly.

There seem to be an issue with how the mouth is formed at the right side.

There is an unnatural spit at the to of the ear.

The second file

There is an issue with the way the hand is drawn. The side with the little finger is too straight and there is this unnatural rise down the wrist area. The thumb second joint is a bit too sharp.

The model is looking in two different directions at the same time.

Teeth are joined together by gum and otherwise. The mouth is not correctly formed on the left side.

There seem to be issues with the gifts and bows

The third image

I am not sure this would be a big deal, however the lacing is different for each foot of shoes. I also get the feel of two different foot of shoes, or something else that is off with the shoes.

I think there is an error with this hand - the finger area.

The front teeth join

A few of the holes are missing in the belt and shirt patterns straying on the belt.

 

These are the issues I find

Best wishes

Jacquelin

 

 

 

 

Jill_C
Community Expert
Community Expert
December 21, 2024

There are numerous drawing errors.

Jill C., Forum Volunteer
Yamuna Gita
Known Participant
December 21, 2024

Congratulations, and now find the flaws in this image 

daniellei4510
Community Expert
Community Expert
December 21, 2024

80% of my portfolio consists of photo realistic people. It took me awhile to know why some of my initial submissions were being rejected. One of them was hair.

 

Adobe Community Expert | If you can't fix it, hide it; if you can't hide it, delete it.
daniellei4510
Community Expert
Community Expert
December 21, 2024

The third one: the holes in his belt are poorly drawn or some are missing; the snow on his suit...is this supposed to be real snow or is it a pattern on the suit itself?

Adobe Community Expert | If you can't fix it, hide it; if you can't hide it, delete it.
Yamuna Gita
Known Participant
December 21, 2024

Sorry, but I disagree. Rejecting image because the hole in the belt is bad is some kind of nonsense.

Abambo
Community Expert
AbamboCommunity ExpertCorrect answer
Community Expert
December 22, 2024
quote

Sorry, but I disagree. Rejecting image because the hole in the belt is bad is some kind of nonsense.


By @Yamuna Gita

Well, some moderators do not see the flaws, but the buyer will see them, if they are important to him. 

 

Just looking at the belt, I see multiple rendering errors and a lot of compression artefacts, and each of those would be a rejection for cause. In addition the white points are probably more disturbing than doing good.

It's not because it's generative AI that the buyer needs to accept errors in the picture. But I agree that many buyers would use the picture without an issue and depending on the use it could be perfectly fine. The catalogues are full of bad assets (both generative AI and badly edited, or both together). But if you submit this asset to stock, it needs to be better than this. It may be perfectly suited for use on your homepage, however.

ABAMBO | Hard- and Software Engineer | Photographer
RALPH_L
Community Expert
Community Expert
December 21, 2024

 

Yamuna Gita
Known Participant
December 21, 2024

are you kidding me

Abambo
Community Expert
Community Expert
December 22, 2024

Not exactly, except if you think that @RALPH_L did do a bad job in pointing out all the flaws. The issue here is that ONE of those flaws jumping into the eyes of the moderator will trigger the refusal. No need to look further. But you will need to check your asset thoroughly to find all the flaws. 

ABAMBO | Hard- and Software Engineer | Photographer