Sorry, but I disagree. Rejecting image because the hole in the belt is bad is some kind of nonsense.
By @Yamuna Gita
Well, some moderators do not see the flaws, but the buyer will see them, if they are important to him.
Just looking at the belt, I see multiple rendering errors and a lot of compression artefacts, and each of those would be a rejection for cause. In addition the white points are probably more disturbing than doing good.

It's not because it's generative AI that the buyer needs to accept errors in the picture. But I agree that many buyers would use the picture without an issue and depending on the use it could be perfectly fine. The catalogues are full of bad assets (both generative AI and badly edited, or both together). But if you submit this asset to stock, it needs to be better than this. It may be perfectly suited for use on your homepage, however.
Sign up
Already have an account? Login
To post, reply, or follow discussions, please sign in with your Adobe ID.
Sign inSign in to Adobe Community
To post, reply, or follow discussions, please sign in with your Adobe ID.
Sign inEnter your E-mail address. We'll send you an e-mail with instructions to reset your password.
