Skip to main content
Participant
February 7, 2024
Answered

Why this pictures weren't accept

  • February 7, 2024
  • 3 replies
  • 490 views

 I dont know what adobe need more to do to accept this picture  ??? This is a "quality issue", really ?  

This topic has been closed for replies.
Correct answer Ricky336

Hello,

Yes, actually, there is a quality issue here! Firstly, one will argue your leaning perspectives of the buildings - typical when taken with a wide-angle lens, secondly - the sun is a little burnt out, so it makes it a white blob, so to speak. The toning may also be an issue, even though it is an evening shot.

Also, when submitting don't include frames!!

 

Have a read of this. It's a brief guide on quality:
https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/help/reasons-for-content-rejection.html

 

 

3 replies

RALPH_L
Community Expert
Community Expert
February 7, 2024

In addition to what @Ricky336 said, the shadows are under exposed.

Abambo
Community Expert
Community Expert
February 7, 2024

Yes, it's really a quality issue.

It's overexposed (blacks are missing);

But in the dark areas, there is no detail like with this ship.

It looks like you have applied a filter, that simulates old paper prints.

 

In addition the frame is not allowed, but that would have been a non-compliant refusal.


If the picture had been as sharp as required, it could well be that this logo would constitute an IP issue:

This surly does:

 

In addition: If you check the image, you see strong compression artefacts.

 

Other points have been named by @Ricky336 

 

If you are new to stock, you should consider these resources: https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/tutorials.html
Please read the contributor user manual for more information on Adobe stock contributions: https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/user-guide.html
See here for rejection reasons: https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/help/reasons-for-content-rejection.html
and especially quality and technical issues: https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/help/quality-and-technical-issues.html

ABAMBO | Hard- and Software Engineer | Photographer
Participant
February 7, 2024

I understand underexpose issue but the detail on this picture only 16mp, can not enough for that much detail 

Thanks for telling me.

 

Abambo
Community Expert
Community Expert
February 7, 2024

I check at the pixel (or at 200%). The detail should be there, or the processing or the lens did create a degradation. 16Mp is OK. It's not great (for today's standards), but it is OK.

ABAMBO | Hard- and Software Engineer | Photographer
Ricky336
Community Expert
Ricky336Community ExpertCorrect answer
Community Expert
February 7, 2024

Hello,

Yes, actually, there is a quality issue here! Firstly, one will argue your leaning perspectives of the buildings - typical when taken with a wide-angle lens, secondly - the sun is a little burnt out, so it makes it a white blob, so to speak. The toning may also be an issue, even though it is an evening shot.

Also, when submitting don't include frames!!

 

Have a read of this. It's a brief guide on quality:
https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/help/reasons-for-content-rejection.html

 

 

Participant
February 7, 2024

Hi, i dont get a part "perspective of building" is that mean a building have to be straight like a have to use lens tilt-shilf ??

Thanks for a tell me a frame

 

Ricky336
Community Expert
Community Expert
February 7, 2024

The buildings ideally should be perpendicular, like if you used a tilt-shift lens. This can be corrected in Lightroom/Photoshop etc. They shouldn't lean.