Skip to main content
Participant
February 7, 2024
Answered

Why this pictures weren't accept

 I dont know what adobe need more to do to accept this picture  ??? This is a "quality issue", really ?  

This topic is closed to new replies. Start a new post to keep the conversation going.
Ricky336
Ricky336Correct answer
Community Expert
February 7, 2024

Hello,

Yes, actually, there is a quality issue here! Firstly, one will argue your leaning perspectives of the buildings - typical when taken with a wide-angle lens, secondly - the sun is a little burnt out, so it makes it a white blob, so to speak. The toning may also be an issue, even though it is an evening shot.

Also, when submitting don't include frames!!

 

Have a read of this. It's a brief guide on quality:
https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/help/reasons-for-content-rejection.html

 

 

12 replies

RALPH_L
Community Expert
Community Expert
February 7, 2024

In addition to what @Ricky336 said, the shadows are under exposed.

Translate
Abambo
Community Expert
Community Expert
February 7, 2024

Yes, it's really a quality issue.

It's overexposed (blacks are missing);

But in the dark areas, there is no detail like with this ship.

It looks like you have applied a filter, that simulates old paper prints.

 

In addition the frame is not allowed, but that would have been a non-compliant refusal.


If the picture had been as sharp as required, it could well be that this logo would constitute an IP issue:

This surly does:

 

In addition: If you check the image, you see strong compression artefacts.

 

Other points have been named by @Ricky336 

 

If you are new to stock, you should consider these resources: https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/tutorials.html
Please read the contributor user manual for more information on Adobe stock contributions: https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/user-guide.html
See here for rejection reasons: https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/help/reasons-for-content-rejection.html
and especially quality and technical issues: https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/help/quality-and-technical-issues.html

Translate
ABAMBO | Hard- and Software Engineer | Photographer
Participant
February 7, 2024

I understand underexpose issue but the detail on this picture only 16mp, can not enough for that much detail 

Thanks for telling me.

 

Translate
Abambo
Community Expert
Community Expert
February 7, 2024

I check at the pixel (or at 200%). The detail should be there, or the processing or the lens did create a degradation. 16Mp is OK. It's not great (for today's standards), but it is OK.

Translate
ABAMBO | Hard- and Software Engineer | Photographer
Ricky336
Community Expert
Ricky336Community ExpertCorrect answer
Community Expert
February 7, 2024

Hello,

Yes, actually, there is a quality issue here! Firstly, one will argue your leaning perspectives of the buildings - typical when taken with a wide-angle lens, secondly - the sun is a little burnt out, so it makes it a white blob, so to speak. The toning may also be an issue, even though it is an evening shot.

Also, when submitting don't include frames!!

 

Have a read of this. It's a brief guide on quality:
https://helpx.adobe.com/stock/contributor/help/reasons-for-content-rejection.html

 

 

Translate
Participant
February 7, 2024

Hi, i dont get a part "perspective of building" is that mean a building have to be straight like a have to use lens tilt-shilf ??

Thanks for a tell me a frame

 

Translate
Ricky336
Community Expert
Community Expert
February 7, 2024

The buildings ideally should be perpendicular, like if you used a tilt-shift lens. This can be corrected in Lightroom/Photoshop etc. They shouldn't lean.

Translate