Skip to main content
Participating Frequently
December 16, 2025
Question

Nano Banana Pro is 40 Credits Now?

  • December 16, 2025
  • 12 replies
  • 8998 views

Nano Banana Pro is now 40 credits and it is too expensive to use now. In my first try today it was 10 credits and I made couple of images with it which were not as I wanted and when I checked it again it increased to 40 credits? Wow!

12 replies

January 24, 2026

Absolutely insane that there's nothing inbetween $29/mo and $199/mo 

Known Participant
January 16, 2026

They ended thier unlimited picture and video generation promotion! I didn't even know about it and have Firefly Pro, and now everything, INCLUDING thier own model (what am I paying for?) costs a ridiculous amount of credits, for what you get, which is 8000 credits. To really use Firefly effectively, you need premium, and on top of that, will likely have to buy even more credits to compensate for unusuable images and videos. In effect, they are entirely focused profiteering, and could care less it seems, about offering thier customers a product of value. You lost a customer, which I am sure, is among many today Adobe. 

January 16, 2026

Same happened here. And there was no warning about this, nor do they show the credits being depleted when generating images.. only get the warning once credits are almost finished. Unprincipled business practice. 

 

January 16, 2026

To my shock I also just got the low credits warning due to being charged 40 credits per image.  They failed to announce that the price increased by 4x. What a scam company! Must be the increased demand, but  this price gouging will eventually come to a stop once they lose enough customers. 

Participant
January 16, 2026
In the end, I use Adobe the old fashioned way. Not for image generation. On an AI project, you need at least 200 generations. With my plan, I can only do 100/month. So I know in advance that I can't do an entire project with firefly. Adobe has become just an expensive tool again. Fortunately, other platforms have understood the benefit of providing simpler access to their AI.
Participating Frequently
January 2, 2026

The previous post I made on here was about Photoshop, not Firefly (I didn’t notice the breadcrumb titles), but either way I was being charged 40 credits for NBP (Nano Banana Pro) generations regardless of size or complexity (even for a tiny in-image correction). Adobe support confirmed the issue, then went quiet for a week. Then they finally responded on Christmas Day summarising and acknowledging the overcharge (photoshop was and is still telling me each action should cost 10 credits) but saying there was nothing they could or would do about it. Two days later, on 27 December, because I had not responded during the holiday period, they closed the support ticket and changed the ticket title to suggest that instead of being an issue of an overcharge, that I had sought 'guidance’. 

 
In the UK they are breaking the law (i.e. the Consumer Protection from Unfair Trading Regulations 2008) by indicating one price and charging another (even with a credit-based system), so I will be forwarding a complaint to their compliance department, but I’m not holding my breath as from my perspective, Abode seem like a bunch of crooks.

Let me put this into some wider commercial perspective: for about $10 a month for Adobe's ‘2,000 Credits' Plan, I would get 200 NBP generations a month if they charged me 10 credits each. But because they are now charging me 40 credits each, I get just 50 generations a month. Hold that thought for a moment, then take a look at an account with Google's Gemini AI ( https://gemini.google.com/ ) - the originators of NBP. For $20 a month, you get 100 generations a day. Yes, you read that right: 100 generations a day! Plus all the other fantastic AI tools that come with the account (you’ll be amazed if you don’t already use Gemini); plus you can upload about ten different files for reference when asking it to generate images e.g. “Show a 4k image of the man in the red hat (from the uploaded image) dancing with the woman in the green dress (from the other uploaded image), in front of the car in another uploaded image, in a busy London shopping street, at night, but in the style of the uploaded style guide.” This is a poor prompt but the point is, the AI will in this case reference four different uploaded files, working out for itself what you mean. And all this is standard with Gemini AI, and you can do it 100 times a day before it falls back to the 2.5 model.

So by switching from Adobe, you lose the ability to do small in-image edits with NBP, but you can keep re-generating the main image (or keep correcting the generation but with a tiny loss of detail each time) for dozens of times without worrying about your credit quota. And even if you do use more than 100 generations, it all resets the next day. OK, so Gemini defaults to 2k images unless you specify 4k, and when the servers are busy, it sometimes still gives you 2k … but you’re using the same Google servers as Adobe are using through the Google API, so any limitations of quality during peak demand are going to effect you either way.

How does this compare in any fair and sane world? Fifty NBP generations a month with Adobe for $10, against 100 generations a day (that’s 3,000 generations a month) for $20 with Google (who developed NBP in the first place). I find it difficult to believe that Adobe as a corporate body can have the nerve to shamelessly rip their customers off in this way. And the way their support team treated me is beyond 'sharp practice' and into the territory of criminal behaviour…certainly illegal behaviour in the UK. Adobe have always ripped off their loyal customers (of which I have been one since they first bought out Aldus many decades ago), but this AI malarkey pushes their corporate greed to new depths. And if they cared one bit about their customers, they would monitor this forum and try to keep people happy. But no, even that is too much for the arrogant greed of Adobe.
Participant
January 2, 2026

Where does it say how many you get per day? I was under the impression at least from when I last checked that the monthly plans didn't have an actual hard limit that google would post and only knew of paying per generation but that seems like a much better deal. I caved and for the month upgraded to adobes $20 plan since it's still unlimited until 1/15 but after that I'm done. 100 per day is generally plenty I just didn't know for sure that was available.

Participating Frequently
January 3, 2026

Gemini AI is for individuals who want to use the AI tools, and comes with daily limits. Google AI Studio is for developers and uses a credit-based system. If you ask Google about the Gemini daily limits for each tool, it will tell you that the Pro plan, costing about $20pm, cuts off at 100 NBP image generations per day. You also get 3 video generation per day and some Deep Research uses too. Adobe is so overpriced with its Credits that it's a rip-off plain and simple. 

January 2, 2026

January 2, 2026
2bf25877-52d2-41b9-abad-ae08ee1b1d66-md.jpg
January 1, 2026

Yep - I just cancelled. There are also a number of services that were free as part of your subscription which now cost. So I'm out.

December 28, 2025

I stopped paying for Creative Cloud Pro just for the extra credits a long time. Now I just use a third party Plugin (Pablo) which costs just a couple of cents per generation. $105 per month for 100 NBP generations equals more than a dollar per generation 💀

December 29, 2025

That sounds great ! Will give it a try !

Participating Frequently
December 20, 2025

I've just realised that my NBP generations have been costing me 40 credits each for the last few days, with no warning. I'm now almost out of credits on a 2000 Plan that should easily last me a month. The Adobe website says (as of today) that Photoshop premium AI generations cost 10 credits each, and the desktop app 'generate' button tooltip clearly states (as of today) that "this generation will use 10 credits".

 

I did not understand why my account balance had suddenly plummeted so yesterday I spent over an hour on chat to a support guy who talked me through various tests (using up what few credits I had remaining) and restarts, and even resorted to Remote Desktop access just to satisfy himself that my generations were indeed costing me 40 credits each and that the app was indeed telling me that they cost 10 credits each. He clearly had no idea about the sudden x4 price hike, as he agreed that there must be a fault with my account. I pointed out that in the UK, indicating one price and then charging another is illegal according to the principals established by the Price Marking Order legislation. So after many hours of testing, research and 'chatting', I was still none the wiser about what I now read here to be an unannounced and undocumented x4 price hike.

 

The support guy booked the only two-hour slot they had for a callback by a senior support guy who would, he said, try and work out what was wrong. Today I rearranged my busy Xmas work schedule in order to be by the phone, and kept the line free. The call never came but at the end of the slot I got an email informing me that I would be called tonight between 11.30pm and 1.30am (they know I live in the UK). I immediately replied pointing out that I go to bed at 10.30pm, but got no response. So I stayed up until now (3am) but no phone call was received.

 

I've been an Adobe/Aldus customer since their very first product back in the 90s (or was it the 80s, I can't remember) and they have always put profit over customer loyalty and care, but this latest incident takes the biscuit! The x4 price hike is almost unbelievable given the various disadvantages of using NBP through Photoshop e.g. only being able to use one reference image; not being able to chain/build prompts consecutively but having to start afresh each time; low resolutions (took me a while to realise that if you have a 3800 x 2800 file, for example, the generation is obviously being run in a much lower resolution and then upscaled without any upscaling, if you know what I mean); and not being able to roll over one's credits each month. The only advantage is workflow neatness but there's no way I'm going to pay double the going rate of Google's own Gemini service and have to deal with the disadvantages too.

So that's it for me. Adobe have just lost me as an AI customer and I'll switch from Photoshop too if I find I can do without it (as AI gets even better in future). Adobe's support team clearly don't collectively know what they're doing, and Adobe generally have always taken their customers for granted. For now, I'm going to start using the much cheaper (than Adobe's new pricing) Google Gemini web service (unless I've misunderstood something) and drag the resultant files across into Photoshop. Not impressed!

 

 

Participant
December 23, 2025
40 credits for a single NBP generation is unacceptable when you're paying for a Creative Pro plan. We urge Adobe's finance department to come to their senses and reduce the NBP generation to 10 credits.
December 18, 2025

Adobe just quietly increased their generative AI credit requirement from 10 to 40 credits per use. Let that sink in - a 300% increase overnight.

For those of us already paying premium subscription fees for Creative Cloud, this feels less like a service adjustment and more like a bait-and-switch. We were willing to work within the 10-credit system, budgeting our AI-assisted workflows accordingly. But 40 credits? That's not a tweak - it's a fundamental shift that makes the feature practically unusable for regular work.

We're not asking for unlimited free AI generation. We understand server costs exist. But when you're already charging professional-tier subscription prices, nickel-and-diming your loyal user base with a 4x credit increase feels exploitative. Either the tools are part of the Creative Cloud package we're paying for, or they're not. This middle-ground approach just alienates the designers, artists, and creators who've built their workflows around your ecosystem.

Adobe, we pay enough. Don't make us pay twice.

Participant
December 19, 2025

And we are only getting 1k when they could be giving us 4K or at the very least 2k since at Google it cost the same as 1k. Would have been nice if they mentioned it ahead of time I would have finished my project right away. I was thinking of keeping Firefly another month but not at that price increase might as well just use Google.