Skip to main content
Participant
Aug 26, 2022 2:09 AM UTC
Question

P:Limitation of Adobe Generative AI user guidelines [merged thread]

Hello Adobe and its collective users

I am writing to you not only as a devoted user of Adobe’s suite of creative tools but also as a professional photographer whose work has been recognized and displayed in museum settings. My specialization in classic nudes has allowed me to explore the human form in a manner that celebrates beauty, form, and artistic expression. However, I have encountered a significant challenge with the AI restrictions placed on editing images that contain nudity, even when such images are created within a professional, artistic context.

 

As an artist whose work often involves nuanced and sensitive subjects, I understand and respect the complexities of creating ethical AI tools that serve a wide user base. However, the current limitations significantly impact my creative process and professional workflow, particularly when it comes to editing backgrounds for nude or semi-nude images. These restrictions not only prolong my work but also inhibit my artistic expression, compelling me to seek alternative solutions that may not offer the same level of quality and integration as Adobe’s products.

 

I propose the consideration of the following points, which I believe could benefit both Adobe and its professional users:

 

Artistic Integrity and Professional Use: Recognition of the professional and artistic context in which tools are used can help differentiate between content that is genuinely creative and that which the restrictions aim to prevent.

 

Ethical Use Policy: An ethical use policy that accommodates professional artists and photographers, possibly through a verification process, ensuring that our work is not unduly censored while maintaining legal and ethical standards.

 

Custom Solutions for Professionals: The development of specialized software versions that allow more flexibility for editing sensitive content, with appropriate safeguards to prevent misuse.

 

Feedback and Advisory Panel: Establishing a panel of professionals from the art and photography community to provide ongoing feedback and insights on how Adobe’s tools can better serve creative professionals.

 

Transparent Guidelines: The creation of clear, transparent guidelines that navigate the legal and ethical landscape, especially regarding sensitive content, to ensure users can understand and comply with Adobe’s policies.

 

I am fully committed to engaging in a constructive dialogue and am willing to be part of a solution that respects both the creative needs of artists and the ethical considerations of digital content. I believe that by working together, we can find a balanced approach that supports artistic expression while adhering to shared values and responsibilities.

 

Thank you for considering my perspective on this matter. I am hopeful for an opportunity to discuss this further and explore how we can make Adobe’s tools even more inclusive and accommodating for professional artists and photographers.    Steven Williams 

383 replies

Inspired Kindergartens
Known Participant
Feb 26, 2026 8:54 PM UTC

The violation for  “A sunny day overlooking a desolate alien planet with geometric shaped rock formations” 

I tested and it looks like the word “overlooking” is flagged. I exchanged it to “over-looking” and this not only passed the violation but it changed the word back to “overlooking”!

I want greater transparency on which words have been violated in your prompt so you can amend the prompt accordingly. A short prompt like the one above is easy… I don’t use short prompts because credits are expensive to the environment and to my wallet.

Translate
Hajar Toutsi
Community Manager
Community Manager
Feb 23, 2026 12:54 PM UTC
The following idea has been merged into this idea:

All the votes have been transferred into this idea.
Translate
censormynamejim
Participant
Feb 6, 2026 4:09 PM UTC

While I appreciate your idea Steven, if there are people involved it what is art and what is not….. nothing will be solved…. it’s too grey… it is so bad that crazy stuff gets shut down, I tried to upscale an image with a model and me. The model had a tube top on, so she was bare shouldered,  the image was shot from the shoulders up.. Adobe censored it.. with no recourse, no way to correct it, I went to a website to fix it…. the things that really gripes me are things that happen on my desktop, inside of photoshop.. not over on firefly.. just want to upscale.. after a day of these frustrations I went to an adobe group… I went to sign in…. my name if Jim Hancock. I could not sign in with my name as I was told my name was profanity…… Hancock…. AI is so stupid, it saw the cock and I couldn’t sign in…. I had to makeup a name… I don’t know what Dick Sweat does, or Peter Guber for crying out loud….. this needs to change… I’m behind creating fakes of known people…. fair enough, I hate that practice …. but it won’t stop, people have been doing that in photoshop for ages…… it is better to let some offensive stuff slide than censor plain ole vanilla content…… people are leaving. I can’t bear it.. I have been a photoshop user since 95…I can’t do without it….. . spent a fortune….. but there are AI options I can use…. without censorship… 

Translate
Participant
Nov 15, 2025 7:21 PM UTC

Plain and simple... Let people have as much creative freedom as they need. I've been trying to get a storyboard for a film going and all i get is "can't load" or "prompt decline" there should be very limited guidelines. 

Translate
Participant
Oct 22, 2025 12:42 AM UTC

So mentioning the President of the United States goes against your guidelines??? Canceling my account you sick disgusting liberals - FREEDOM OF SPEECH 

Translate
J E L
Community Expert
Community Expert
Oct 22, 2025 10:44 PM UTC

Hi @Jeffrey245844446dw4, well, lol, I don't think it's as bad as all that (I hope not!). But, seriously, I've helped other users who got similar flags with Firefly, and, honestly, this isn't about politics or bias; it's a built-in safeguard in Firefly to prevent generating likenesses of real people, living or deceased public figures like presidents, celebrities, and so on. Adobe's AI is going to force those restrictions, and it's the same for any notable person, regardless of side. There are several other AI models that have minimal guardrails on creating realistic or satirical images of politicians you could try. But even if allowed, you should always avoid misleading or harmful uses. We are sorry to see you go!

Translate
Participant
Oct 22, 2025 12:41 AM UTC

So mentioning the President of the United States house is against your guidelines??? Canceling my account you sick disgusting liberals - FREEDOM OF SPEECH 

Translate
Impressive_Giggles16E5
Participating Frequently
Sep 24, 2025 1:17 PM UTC

Votre programme de génération d'image Firefly est nul. 

Translate
Kartika Rawat
Community Manager
Community Manager
Sep 24, 2025 1:35 PM UTC

Hi stéphanl14799681!

Sorry to hear that. Please share more info on what's happening. 

 

Let us know. Happy to investigate.

Thanks, 
^KR

 

moved to discussions

Translate
Participant
Aug 30, 2025 3:34 AM UTC
  1. Í

 

Translate
Participant
Aug 30, 2025 3:38 AM UTC

There are too many content restrictions.

Translate
daniellei4510
Community Expert
Community Expert
Aug 11, 2025 4:56 PM UTC

I don't like this particular result, but being less precise about your selection often solves the problem.

 

Translate
Adobe Community Expert | I have miles to go before I sleep, but I'm all done on this end.
Participating Frequently
Aug 11, 2025 4:51 PM UTC

They're protecting you from all harmful things, just like good, coddling, helicopter parents.

Translate