Skip to main content
Participant
Aug 26, 2022 2:09 AM UTC
Question

P:Limitation of Adobe Generative AI user guidelines [merged thread]

Hello Adobe and its collective users

I am writing to you not only as a devoted user of Adobe’s suite of creative tools but also as a professional photographer whose work has been recognized and displayed in museum settings. My specialization in classic nudes has allowed me to explore the human form in a manner that celebrates beauty, form, and artistic expression. However, I have encountered a significant challenge with the AI restrictions placed on editing images that contain nudity, even when such images are created within a professional, artistic context.

 

As an artist whose work often involves nuanced and sensitive subjects, I understand and respect the complexities of creating ethical AI tools that serve a wide user base. However, the current limitations significantly impact my creative process and professional workflow, particularly when it comes to editing backgrounds for nude or semi-nude images. These restrictions not only prolong my work but also inhibit my artistic expression, compelling me to seek alternative solutions that may not offer the same level of quality and integration as Adobe’s products.

 

I propose the consideration of the following points, which I believe could benefit both Adobe and its professional users:

 

Artistic Integrity and Professional Use: Recognition of the professional and artistic context in which tools are used can help differentiate between content that is genuinely creative and that which the restrictions aim to prevent.

 

Ethical Use Policy: An ethical use policy that accommodates professional artists and photographers, possibly through a verification process, ensuring that our work is not unduly censored while maintaining legal and ethical standards.

 

Custom Solutions for Professionals: The development of specialized software versions that allow more flexibility for editing sensitive content, with appropriate safeguards to prevent misuse.

 

Feedback and Advisory Panel: Establishing a panel of professionals from the art and photography community to provide ongoing feedback and insights on how Adobe’s tools can better serve creative professionals.

 

Transparent Guidelines: The creation of clear, transparent guidelines that navigate the legal and ethical landscape, especially regarding sensitive content, to ensure users can understand and comply with Adobe’s policies.

 

I am fully committed to engaging in a constructive dialogue and am willing to be part of a solution that respects both the creative needs of artists and the ethical considerations of digital content. I believe that by working together, we can find a balanced approach that supports artistic expression while adhering to shared values and responsibilities.

 

Thank you for considering my perspective on this matter. I am hopeful for an opportunity to discuss this further and explore how we can make Adobe’s tools even more inclusive and accommodating for professional artists and photographers.    Steven Williams 

383 replies

Nancy OShea
Community Expert
Community Expert
Apr 9, 2025 10:24 PM UTC

"I wanted an image of two children standing in front of an abandoned, post-apocalyptic amusement park..."

 

Divide and conquer.  Generate the children as a separate image. Then generate the amusement park. 

Combine the two manually with traditional compositing techniques.

 

Translate
Nancy O'Shea— Product User & Community Expert
AlanGilbertson
Community Expert
Community Expert
Apr 9, 2025 10:18 PM UTC

@c.pfaffenbichler You just highlighted a problem with AI, which is that most people don't realize that the term "AI" is almost meaningless because it covers such a broad range of different technologies. (Think how the word "vehicle" covers a moped, an SUV, a semi-truck, and a SpaceX Dragon. They have some technologies in common, but they are very different.)

 

Google Deep Mind solved the protein folding problem some years ago using a specific AI technology that grew out of their machine learning research. Co-founder and CEO of Google DeepMind, Sir Demis Hassabis, and Google DeepMind Senior Research Scientist Dr. John Jumper, who led the development team, were co-awarded the 2024 Nobel Prize in Chemistry for that breakthrough. Yes, it is a kind of AI, an advanced type of machine learning, but should not be conflated with the technology behind Firefly or Adobe Sensei, just as you wouldn't conflate Toyota engineering with SpaceX engineering.

 

I know that probably seems picky, but it's important. "AI" is everywhere. Not all of it is real. We all have to understand what it is we're dealing with or we'll be swamped.

Translate
daniellei4510
Community Expert
Community Expert
Apr 9, 2025 10:07 PM UTC

I think that honor goes to ChatGPT. I wanted an image of two children standing in front of an abandoned, post-apocalyptic amusement park, and it refused to generate anything that suggested harm to children.

Translate
Adobe Community Expert | I have miles to go before I sleep, but I'm all done on this end.
Nancy OShea
Community Expert
Community Expert
Apr 9, 2025 7:58 PM UTC

@Phil34542109ukyf,

 

Adobe isn't likely to change their Terms of Use policies. If you want to create adult content, use another approach. Find an AI service that allows adult content creation (I don't know of any).  Or get an AI app on a private platform, to which only you have access.

 

Translate
Nancy O'Shea— Product User & Community Expert
nicmart
Inspiring
Apr 9, 2025 10:03 PM UTC
It’s NOT just adult content. Adobe censors fully clothed women who are buxom. It has a long list of forbidden things to generate, such as bathing suit and gun. It’s the more strict artistic censorship in American history.
Translate
Participant
Apr 7, 2025 11:03 PM UTC

Yout BLOCKING creative adult content images whil other programs allow it. Put a waiver up to sign to let us adult artist creat some cool images to sell online im some cases something slips by such as a womans chest God forbid you let us see womans chest on here hey we are adults and you can block kids from creating nip by simply verifying our age ..... oth programs allow it please consider it thanks even Photoshop blocks eciting of a image created in Firefly that may show some skin hey WAKE up it's NOT real skin OMG DISPOINTED in your blocking content 

Translate
Participant
Apr 2, 2025 1:18 AM UTC

The AI behind the text to photo needs to be so "woke" as it create images that are both culturally offensive and inappropriate.  The request of traditional Arabic women dressed in traditional Muslim gowns or historically accurate Turkish costumes should not include by default, men with beards crossdressing.  It should also be sensitive to the actual historical appearance of these individuals and not try to be multi-cultural to the point where 75% of images are inappropriate to the request.  This wastes time and resources, making Firefly nearly unusable for anyone on a deadline.  

Translate
Kartika Rawat
Community Manager
Community Manager
Apr 2, 2025 5:17 PM UTC

Your insights are valuable; we'll share them with the team. You can refer to a similar discussion: https://adobe.ly/4liAyUo

 

I hope this helps. Thank you for your feedback on Adobe Firefly.

KR

Translate
Participant
Mar 25, 2025 2:12 AM UTC

Rubbish. "Deep fakes"  Nothing deep about them.

Next you'll be wanting to ban paint brushes and artists paper.  [removed]

Translate
Inspiring
Feb 22, 2025 3:49 PM UTC

It's interesting that the same image got different reactions from Photopshop. The word "kitchen" was fine. "Bedroom," not so so much.

There are far bigger issues in the world than this silliness. Still, it's worth a thought or two.

Translate
droopydog500
Community Manager
Community Manager
Feb 18, 2025 7:17 PM UTC

Please keep the discussions focused on Adobe Firefly, not general political discussions.

 

Thanks,

    droopy, Moderator

Translate
Adobe Community Expert (not an Adobe employee)
Participant
Feb 16, 2025 6:09 PM UTC

Hello dear Adobe,

Guys, are you planning to reconsider the overly strict censorship in Adobe Firefly? A completely decent photo of a girl in a swimsuit—are these p***graphic materials or too much nudity? Seriously? Have you been to the beach or pool recently? The censorship can even target regular summer tops where a woman's stomach is exposed...


"Cartoon superhero duck wearing a dramatic cape and mask, holding a toy gun in a heroic pose"—what's wrong here? Violence? Cruelty? Guys, a duck holding a toy gun is a theme from a children's cartoon for kids aged 6 and up...

Adobe, you have always made your software primarily for professionals who need to accomplish a variety of tasks. But the overly strict censorship of your AI greatly limits the ability to perform these tasks. I mostly create materials for a lingerie store (not a p*** studio), and I cannot always use Adobe AI capabilities.

Some people, believe it or not, need to use "gun" in their work not to promote violence.

I understand that without strict censorship some people will use AI for not the best purposes. Perhaps there are no other ways yet to teach a neural network what is good and what is bad. But you can maintain strict censorship in projects aimed at a wide audience (Adobe Firefly and Adobe Express web resources) while significantly simplifying it for professional software users from the Creative Cloud package.

Translate
Participant
Feb 16, 2025 6:13 PM UTC

Understand me correctly, I do not want to offend anyone's religious feelings with this image. But this method really works!

Is this correct? Is this how professionals should work in professional software?



Translate