Skip to main content
Todd_Kopriva
Inspiring
June 2, 2011
Question

Adobe seeking feedback about panels, palettes, workspaces, and other UI elements

  • June 2, 2011
  • 72 replies
  • 36298 views

Several folks within Adobe are discussing the user interfaces for our various applications, and we'd like your feedback.

Do you use After Effects, Premiere Pro, Photoshop, Illustrator, and Lightroom? Other Adobe applications?

If so, please post your comments on this forum thread comparing your experiences with the user interfaces of these applications.

Regarding the panels, palettes, workspaces, and overall UI paradigms in these applications: What do you like? What do you hate? Do you care that the applications are different in this regard? What differences do you even notice?

    This topic has been closed for replies.

    72 replies

    dan_hin
    Participating Frequently
    June 16, 2011

    I'd just like some common shortcuts and capabilities between applications.

    Duplicate

    Move

    Rename

    Timeline fwd/rew

    New project

    New layer/comp

    Group

    If you have what is essentially the same function in one application, it should be standardised to the others.

    Ideally it would be great to see Adobe adopt a versatile, customisable UI much like 3D programmes eg Cinema 4D where pretty much everything can be changed to suit the user, including macros, icon sets, tabs and palettes.

    Dan

    June 19, 2011

    I'd like to second Dan's post. I would like to get rid of my shortcut cheat sheets and frequent, "I did I think it was here" moments. Though, by being a master of none, just an apprentice of all, it seems that I may not know the meaning behind certain design decisions that go into these programs. I figured that placing an object in InDesign and Photoshop would be the same, or that the shortcut for the pen tool would be the same across all programs, but I assume they aren't for a reason I won't know until I become more masterful of the software I use.

    Mike Susko
    Participant
    June 16, 2011

    As a compliment to having keyboard shortcuts, it would be nice to be able to make a shortcut button and put it in the top menu bar.

    I am tired of using inconsistent and deep menu structures to do things like delete pages, layers, etc. Since I don't believe Adobe is serious about making FW any better in a real way (othewise why have they not done it yet?), it would just be nice if I could take all those disparate, deep UI actions, assign them to a button each, and put them in the top bar.

    That would be nice.

    Participant
    June 12, 2011

    Hi guys.
    You need to look at this one site for reviews. [removed by moderator]

    June 12, 2011

    I use the Production Premium CS5 suite. I use most of the programs on a semi-regular basis. It's nice that the UIs look more or less the same, and that the panels dock and undock the same way.

    But it's the little things that are a killer. Adobe should think about standarizing the tools all the way down to the small details. For example, is it "delete", "cut", or "clear"? Pick one. Is transparency shown with a white/gray checkerboard (Photoshop) or black (AE), or something else? Again, pick one (I vote for black actually).

    And for goodness sake, spend some time with some tech. writers on the actual words used in the UI. When I want to move from working on a project in PPro to working on it in AE, I do NOT want to "replace with AE composition" in PPro -- I want to continue working on the project I'm working on, just using another tool! IOW, I want to build on what I'm doing, not replace it with something else! And you wonder why newbies have such a hard time learning Adobe? I've been using this stuff for a year and I'm *still* a newbie, partly because of things like this.

    For another example, what do I have to do in Encore to re-transcode a sequence? I have to "revert to original". WTF? Are you kidding me? What I want, is to do the transcode again, or at least to mark the sequence as un-transcoded so that Encore with transcode it again. Making me guess that the answer is "revert to original" is just user hostile. It's just not right.

    I'd like to see dynamic link become more useful too. It's faintly rediculous that when I have to add some footage to a project in PPro, I see the sequence get longer in Encore, but not the timeline that Encore uses to run the sequence. Not even a warning -- it just lops off the end of your sequence on the DVD you just burned. And no way to manually increase the size of that timeline that I can find -- the answer seems to be to throw away the existing timeline and make a new one (and redo your entire flowchart in the bargain). I mean, come on -- think! How did this make it through testing?

    I was a software developer for 25 years, I know a great deal about the complexites of architecting, designing, writing, and testing code. It ain't even slightly easy, and Adobe is to be congratulated on what they've done so far. I'm just sayin' that we aren't at the end of the path yet, so please keep going.

    Known Participant
    June 13, 2011

    CFG,

    just a couple notes, & I agree with you that Adobe is doing well and should keep it going & evolving, as well as that little things between the programs really need standardized (like my post about shortcuts!)

    --

    In AE you can turn off the black and it becomes a transparency grid, the grid is the stardard for showing transparency.  But designing on transparency grid can be tough so AE has it black by default (maybe the default should be swapped).

    Also, deleting & cutting should be available in both forms in all software; delete just gets rid of the selection; cut "cuts it" and puts it on the clipboard to be pasted.  These are universal in all software (i.e. delete on your keyboard, versus ctr-x on your keyboard).

    --

    Anyway, great points.  Yeah dynamic link certainly has more potential and I seems to be further developed every version.  It definitely needs some fine turning, like the Encore issue.  I don't mind 'replace with AE comp' or 'revert to original', they make sense in my mind & seem to do what you'd expect.  I personally think Adobe's much easier to learn than any of the competition.

    - wb

    Participant
    June 12, 2011

    Please [removed by moderator] , please give us the ability to darken the UI in Photoshop the same way as in AE,Pr. etc.

    Known Participant
    June 12, 2011

    I use a combo of InDesign, Illustrator and Photoshop for my technical writing work. The user interface and integration in these applications is excellent. Adobe managed to keep the UI out of the way very well.

    Since my work is mostly made of typing, I still miss some better way of zooming and scrolling without getting my hands away of the keyboard.

    Also, the way automatic scrolling to follow the text input cursor could be greatly improved. Sometimes, I find myself typing out of the visible area, without InDesign adjusting the view.

    I also use Premiere and After Effect from time to time, and find them as well integrated as the publishing combo. Making Premiere a bit less cluttered of unneeded controls (for example, making them appear only when needed) could be a good idea to clean-up things.

    Dreamweaver, on the other side, is a disaster. I cannot see any logic in how commands are organized in menus and palettes. And there are menu ridiculously long, with no apparent hint of organization.

    Paolo

    Mike Susko
    Participant
    June 10, 2011

    The docking behavior on Fireworks drives me insane on a  daily basis. I never, never, never,never, never, never,never, never,  never want to open 17 docked palettes at once!

    It’s a real pain trying to close them all. Also, they dock in ways  that aren’t useful. Get a pallete near another, and it instantly wants  to dock, or go inside it. This is not fun.
    Sometimes I just want to move them around. Also, when a palette such as  layers wants to dock with the main screen, making your document window  smaller is completely useless as a default behavior. I always want the  palettes to float.

    What would be nice is a pallete manager, where you could somehow choose and arrange a set of pallettes external of using them.

    In Fireworks, the most important pallettes for me are in order: Properties, Pages, Layers, Align, History & Optimize.

    I never use States! Surely most designers use it very sparingly, So  it should not be grouped with the two most important palettes: Layers  and Pages. I think this is a mistake.
    One of the major weaknesses of the palletes in FW is the default  grouping. It seems to be designed by someone who actually does not use  the program on a daily basis.

    Swandive stream
    Inspiring
    June 10, 2011

    I use Photoshop and Flash a lot for my website (along with Dremweaver) and I find it illogical that in Flash, you can lock/unlock multiple layers but you cannot delete multiple layers and in Photoshop, you can delete multiple layers but you can't lock/unlock multiple layers.

    I find this a pain sometimes, especially that in Flash let's say for example I have imported layered content from Photoshop and then I shift most of it to a few layers, I am then left with 5-10 layers which I have to painstakingly right-click, delete, right-click, delete... I find it a nuisance.

    And why does Flash appear to have no alignment guides? And Photoshop does not allow me to modify the gradient after it has been added like Flash does and there is no primitive rectangle or oval tool that I can modify after placement.

    Andrew Yoole
    Inspiring
    June 7, 2011

    My thoughts on the above:  why can't I just drag an item direct from Finder/Explorer window onto a timeline?  After Effects should allow me to do so, and automatically place that item into the project for me, rather than require me to add to the project first, THEN drag to the timeline.

    Participating Frequently
    June 7, 2011

    you can do this in flash builder, dropping something in the project explorer, but this makes me think, why can't i drag a file into the code view of flash builder and have it automatically import it to the "default asset location" and then drop an appropriate embed tag in my code? this would be super slick!

    Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2011 22:19:33 -0600

    From: forums@adobe.com

    To: david_coleman_007@hotmail.com

    Subject: Adobe seeking feedback about panels, palettes, workspaces, and other UI elements

    Another thought: why can't I just drag an item direct from Finder/Explorer window onto a timeline? After Effects should allow me to do so, and automatically place that item into the project for me, rather than require me to add to the project first, THEN drag to the timeline.

    >

    Known Participant
    June 6, 2011

    Primarily using AE/PP with often PS as well, some illustrator.

    I don't think the UI itself -- panels palettes workspaces etc -- need much work, they are overall greatly improved in the last 5+ years & for the most part much ahead of competition. More attention should probably be put into other items that need improved, many of which already came up listed here.

    One thing, I wish text brightness was added as customizable as well as the UI slider; I don't like the text brightness on the lower and higher end of the slider, wish I could customize it.

    _____

    BUG since as far as I can remember, maybe CS3 or earlier: workspaces need to remember multiple monitor setups!

    The problem is, I snap off my timeline into a separate window, and make it full screen.

    Now, if have an explorer/finder window open on the screen where the project & monitors panels where, everything opens fine & my full, double screen layout opens just as I left it.

    However, if I open the project from the monitor that say, my full screen timeline is in, the project/monitor panels etc come up in that same screen, undernearth the timeline.  So I have to nudge the timeline window down, and double click the primary premiere pro window, and for some reason that maximizes it to the other screen).  Then bring my timeline window back into place.

    For this reason alone I kind of like making a single window layout that's just 2-screens wide (Avid-esk), however, I run different resolutions on the monitor and this really complicates things if I'm trying to use all of my screenspace, when two or more monitors have different heights for resolution.  Also, in this setup, all progress windows appear right in the middle, so it's split between the two monitors.  This could be improved.

    ____

    Another request would definitely be to make hotkeys and things like timeline navigation more universal among your apps.  I run Avid+custom setup on my hotkeys in PP--I jump into AE, and every last button is different, and in AE it's not nearly as easily customizable. Same for Encore's, etc.  I'd LOVE for a change in PP's hotkey to reflect how it works in AE, Encore, and even PS in video mode, etc.

    Simarly, as mentioned on this forum, I hate how blending mode changes in PS is arrows keys, on AE is shift + or -, and totally manual (mouse--annoying) in PP.  If there's one thing I wished was improved, it would be to make this particular task universal among Adobe apps.

    I also really miss the hotkey property drop downs from AE when in any other program (c for opacity, a for anchor, etc).  I'd love to see them make it into other apps.

    ____

    Try not to hide things in the panel's window, coming from "hamburger menu's", I like that CS5 has kept things well enough organized to not have a bunch of important options there that are easy to miss.

    Speaking of buttons, I think you'd find it rewarding to add 'fit to fill' and other fit clip options into buttons. They are extremely hidden right now, because you only see the options if you set 4 in/out points and don't drag/drop, which most users will never do.  Additionally, "solo" & "mute" buttons for audio tracks, which are right there on the audio mixer, just makes sense, add them.

    ____

    Another important one is you need to make everything keyboard mappable.  Like in MC, all buttons and actions need to be mappable--just the drop down menus and the few extras you have listed doesn't cut it.  I agree with others here, the keyboard visual layout would be dandy here.

    ____

    Definitely a +1 to improving thumbnail views.  Really quite bad right now.  Need much more customization in sizes thatn just 3 sizes, and a thumbnail + info view (like script view in MC) makes it so you can both see and sort the info, and see the clip at the same time, which is ideal for me.  Be able to customize the thumbnail, maybe a special type of marker that's put in from the preview window?

    ____

    Hope this helps.  For the most part the UI's are really great; it's the thing that most other NLE users are complaining about in their software, not Adobe users.  Often in their forums I'll see posts comparing things to PPro's UI and pointing out how much better developed it is & that particular app should do something similar to what Adobe did.  In my experience, anyway

    - wb