Skip to main content
trashcaneron
trashcaneron
Inspiring
February 2, 2022
Question

After Effects Zoom More than 400%

  • February 2, 2022
  • 3 replies
  • 3273 views

I know there are workarounds here, but man oh man how is it still limited only to 400%? What happens when you need to get really fine tuned on an 8k comp? Woof. 

    3 replies

    R
    Community Expert
    Rick GerardCommunity Expert
    Community Expert
    March 25, 2023

    Do your masking work using Mocha AE. It has better tools, the tracking is more accurate, you can zoom in to the pixel level, and if you have Mocha Pro, you also have access to automatic edge snapping, and you can then export masks, generate a matte, or do a bunch of other things that are not possible using the simple mask you can generate using the masking tools. If the shot is moving, you can even motion stabilize the view in Mocha while you are working with a single click.

    I'm not sure what you are trying to do with your sample shot, but that is a perfect image for a procedural matte if you need to isolate the windows. No masking required. Just a copy of the footage with a little color correction used as a track matte for an effect. 

     

      trashcaneron
      trashcaneronAuthor
      Inspiring
      March 25, 2023

      As usual - Great call, Rick.

       

      I do use Mocha when my masking gets particularly complex but never put two and two together that I could use it for simple masks, too. Usually too lazy to coordinate with Mocha unless it's absolutely necessary. But now I've printed to memory - even for static masks you have that zoom level that you need, if you need it, in Mocha.

       

      That said, clone stamping is still an issue. I know I can export frames to PSDs and do it in there. This will give me zoom to pixel. BUT I find going back and forth through frames is essential for a good stamp technique. Possible but not as quick or as easy to do in photoshop.

       

      Any ideas on that one? 

        trashcaneron
        trashcaneronAuthor
        Inspiring
        March 25, 2023

        Love that I just searched for this... again and this is still the top post! Woof. This is particularly annoying when doing stamp work. Haven't found a work around that solves for this issue. Bummmmmmer. 

          Mylenium
          Mylenium
          Legend
          February 2, 2022

          Yeah, unfortunately not and given how the renderer works I would not expect it to change any time so. In order to allow this it would have to support tiles or other forms of spatial segmentation or else it just blows any computer out of the water no matetr how much memory you have once the buffers exceed a certain size...

           

          Mylenium

          trashcaneron
          trashcaneronAuthor
          Inspiring
          February 2, 2022

          So crazy. It means that making masks on something like this is a massive pain:

          Only work around I've found is to duplicate the comp, reduce its size, do the masks and then bring it back over to the original comp. Crazy. You can also temporarily scale that comp and its mask layer. 

           

          Doing it with the copy method means in this particular example, I can go up to 800%. This obviously doesn't work if you have a mask layer over the whole comp and need to fine tune stuff. 

          Terms & ConditionsAccessibility statement
          Using the community Terms of use Privacy Cookie preferences Do not sell or share my personal information ad choicesAdChoices