Skip to main content
F
Flix_799
Known Participant
November 2, 2016
Answered

So many versions?

  • November 2, 2016
  • 2 replies
  • 611 views

From CS6 to CC2017 there are about 6 versions of after effects. There's too much plugins, scripts and projects tied to specific version and every time I must install plugins, scripts etc. all over again. Isn't that ridiculous?

Wouldn't it be better if we had only one final version of after effects (final release) and one beta version for testing the new features (btw, why are you putting so many new pointless features while the basic ones are not working properly, e.g. preview in real time, multiprocessing render?)

Or at least to have one folder from which all versions could link scripts, plugins etc.

    This topic has been closed for replies.
    Correct answer Dave_LaRonde

    Sorry, but the only adequate response is, "Dream on -- that's not how Adobe works."

    You see, their prime argument for going to software rental was that they could stay on the leading edge because they could let their renters get the new stuff right away.

    Well, as we both know, that's just Marketing Weasel Nonsense.  You've already outlined the flaws in the Marketing Weasels' arguments.

    If there's rental money to be made -- and there is -- and if Adobe can hook new users with new sparklies that may or may not be worth talking about in six months -- and it probably won't be -- they don't care.  The rental loot just rolls in, and in ever-growing amounts.

    It's a really lousy way to run a company: hook the users, then piss 'em off.

    2 replies

    R
    Community Expert
    Rick GerardCommunity Expert
    Community Expert
    November 2, 2016

    If you properly setup your installs and your script folders there is nothing to do when you add another version. I should do a tutorial on how to set that up.

      Peru Bob
      Community Expert
      Peru BobCommunity Expert
      Community Expert
      November 2, 2016

      That's a great idea, Rick.  Please do that.

      Dave_LaRonde
      Dave_LaRondeCorrect answer
      Inspiring
      November 2, 2016

      Sorry, but the only adequate response is, "Dream on -- that's not how Adobe works."

      You see, their prime argument for going to software rental was that they could stay on the leading edge because they could let their renters get the new stuff right away.

      Well, as we both know, that's just Marketing Weasel Nonsense.  You've already outlined the flaws in the Marketing Weasels' arguments.

      If there's rental money to be made -- and there is -- and if Adobe can hook new users with new sparklies that may or may not be worth talking about in six months -- and it probably won't be -- they don't care.  The rental loot just rolls in, and in ever-growing amounts.

      It's a really lousy way to run a company: hook the users, then piss 'em off.

        Terms & ConditionsAccessibility statement
        Using the community Terms of use Privacy Cookie preferences Do not sell or share my personal information ad choicesAdChoices