Workflow: Sharpening -- What is best practice?
I did post this in the general forum, was advised to bring the question here, for more detailed information:
My practice has been to edit a photo, including resizing, then apply sharpening as the last step. Now, I just noticed Camera Raw applies sharpening (default value, 40) before importing into the Photo Editor (Elements '21). WHICH WOULD BE BEST: a) as I have done, let Camera Raw apply its default sharpening, then I again sharpen as last editing step, after resizing; b) set Camera Raw sharpening value to zero (0 - no sharpening), then perform all sharpening as last photo editing step; or, c) Set Camera Raw to a desirable degree of sharpening, and do no more sharpening in Photo Editor ???
PLEASE ADVISE
In the general forum, I have received this response:
Adobe Community Professional
correct answer Correct answer by MichelBParis
Adobe Community Professional , 16 hours ago
Your question has been discussed widely 10 or 15 years ago by the programmers of ACR themselves. The explanations were nearly always how to distinguish and optimize two different stages of sharpening; the 'capture sharpening' which compensate the slight blur creating from the anti-aliasing step after separating color components and the 'output sharpening' to adapt the result to the final output, printing size and parameters or display.
I have difficulties to find links to those discussions, but my guess is that today, most people using ACR or Lightroom for raw processing will keep the default capture setting AND sharpen to taste for their outputs. That may be different for non raw editing (jpegs, tiffs...) were capture sharpening has already been done in camera or software.
I suggest you ask in the ACR forum directly:
ACR FORUM: Please note, that last comment does not apply, I never capture .jpg's in- camera, thus I have no in-camera sharpening.

