Skip to main content
Inspiring
August 31, 2018
Question

Initial Review of FrameMaker 2019

  • August 31, 2018
  • 3 replies
  • 1657 views

I just got FrameMaker 2019. I'm moving there from FM 12. I use primarily unstructured content, and have been using FM on and off for a lot of years. My initial thoughts are these.

The installation is one of Adobe's best for FrameMaker. The software came as a single Zip file, that I downloaded. Running Set-up.exe in the Zip prompts you to unpack everything, which I did. And then, nothing. Nothing. So, I ran Set-up.exe again, and still nothing. The issue was, the second time, I selected the same Set-up.exe file I selected the first time: the one in the Zip. However, when I unpacked the lot, a second folder was created outside the Zip. When I selected that Set-up.exe, the installation began. Yay! Although the installation itself estimated "2-4 minutes remaining," the installation took closer to 25 minutes on my 4-year-old Windows 8.1 Lenovo laptop; I can't blame all of that slowness on Adobe. And, after the installation, I was not prompted to reboot, which made me happy.

The first thing I did, though, was reboot, just to be sure. Then, I checked FM 12, which seems to work fine. I used FM 12 with Acrobat 11 Pro to create a PDF using Save as, and that went seamlessly, also. I did not expect FM 12 to be hobbled by installing FM 2019, because FrameMaker's track record has been to support old versions alongside new ones. I was nervous about Acrobat, but the news seems good there. (The only issue with running an old version alongside a new version of FM is really the copyright. If you upgraded to the new version, and I did not, then you really are obligated to shelve the old version because you used its license for the upgrade.)

So, I opened FrameMaker 2019 ( 15.0.0.393) seemed to work okay as well. I brought in an FM12 book and files, and that went smoothly. Them, I used File > Save as PDF, which did not prompt me to set up bookmarks or even a name for the PDF. I need to dig into this more on this, but the PDF was good.

Next, I tried File > Publish and then selecting PDF presented a default location I did not want. I need to see if I can make that default to the current book directory. It also seemed to give me no options for naming the PDF or setting bookmarks. It did create a PDF subdirectory structure that I did not ask for. But, the PDF looked good. So, I have some way to go to set up PDFing.

Because I use third-party vendors for translation, I took a look and found that FM 2019 will save back to FM 2017, which seems groovy, but I have FM 12, so would probably have to MIF it (or keep using FM 12 for my projects until my vendors catch up).

More later, but I thought I would share my experiences so far. Looks ok; well done Adobe.

Cheers,

Sean

This topic has been closed for replies.

3 replies

anneq090909
Known Participant
January 8, 2019

Thank you,  Stefan Gentz (Adobe) I just updated our software to the most recent release and it does, indeed, seem to solve the issue. Thanks to Adobe for making this correction.

anneq090909
Known Participant
January 7, 2019

Hi Sean,

I'm curious if you've learned anything more about publishing .pdfs, specifically the annoying dialog that pops up when you click 'save as pdf' and the pdf not saving with the .fm book or document. My department is ready to revolt and string up their leader (me) for putting them through this every time they need to generate a .pdf. Any ideas or tips you've learned?

Thanks!

Legend
January 8, 2019

Hi anneq090909,

the "Save as PDF" issue has been addressed in Update 1. You can now do a simple File > Save as PDF, the "Save as File" dialog will open (defaulting to the document's folder), click "Save" and you document will be saved as PDF using the settings defined in the STS file.

See also my blog post here.

Kind regards,

Stefan Gentz

Matt-Tech Comm Tools
Community Expert
Community Expert
August 31, 2018

Hi Sean,

Bookmarks are a catalog-dependent thing, so they're set up under Format > Document > PDF Setup.

See Faster PDF publishing – Adobe FrameMaker (2019 release) - YouTube for an overview. Bookmarks are about 2 minutes into the vid.

I'm not sure about the concurrent usage of old versions being a copyright issue, and would love to hear Adobe weigh in on this. As long as you're not running licenses concurrently I'd expect you're still in Adobe's good graces.

Also, if you have significant localization expense, look to switch to structure to slash your localization costs.

-Matt

-Matt Sullivan, FrameMaker Course Creator, Author, Trainer, Consultant
Inspiring
August 31, 2018

Hi,

Yeah, am going to run through some of the online tutorials to get up to speed, such as here: Installation instructions | Adobe Framemaker (2019 release) .

It doesn't matter to me, I bought a new license not an upgrade one. I think Adobe made a stink about this years ago; maybe they have mellowed?

So, I don't see DTP as a big expense for my translations. That said, I plan on moving to structure, I just need a class to give me a boost to get there. Maybe this year.

Cheers,

Sean

Matt-Tech Comm Tools
Community Expert
Community Expert
August 31, 2018

I'm a big fan of the one at the bottom of that Installation instructions | Adobe Framemaker (2019 release)page...

Regarding the localization...it's not the DTP, but the localization itself that benefits from structure.

Structured files are perhaps 1-10% the size of .fm or .mif files, so there's better and more organized use of translation memory, less hand work.

For my clients, moving to structure results in faster, cheaper, better localization. Of course there are benefits to reuse, SEO, accessibility, and consistency as well.

Let me know when you're ready for that (beyond Intro) training!

-Matt

-Matt Sullivan, FrameMaker Course Creator, Author, Trainer, Consultant