InDesign better at downsampling PDFs than Actobat + a question
I have a folder containing 10 high res uncompressed PDF files, each representing a booklet page.
Combining these pages in Acrobat works fine, but downsampling the final export causes text display issues in Safari on certain models of iPad (I troubleshot this thing with autistic obsession all weekend).
However, downsampling the individual pages during the first Photoshop export (rather than doing it in Acrobat after combining uncompressed pages) DID work - since Acrobat didn't need to touch the pixel data, only bind the pages - but the final result was a few MB larger at equal quality than it was when I let Acrobat do the downsampling (11mb v. 7mb).
As a final hail-mary, I took Acrobat completely out of the equation and fired up InDesign for the first time ever, since I'd heard so much positivity about its handling of PDF files. I created a document, placed the uncompressed PDF pages where they belong (edge to edge) and in less than 2 minutes, I was ready to export.
Amazing results, especially with regards to quality vs file size. You just can't get these numbers downsampling individual pages from Photoshop and combining with Acrobat; apparently, whatever's doing the combining needs to be doing the downsampling too. But more importantly, the fonts appear perfectly on 100% of the devices tested when it's InDesign - rather than Acrobat - processing the images.
The only question I have left with regards to this specific project now is... can I edit the (placed) PDF file from InDesign to add a link? If I could add links in Photoshop, I would; but as far as I know that's not possible, and I don't see any obvious ways to edit the pages after I 'place' them in ID. (I'd also be fine with just placing a rectangle link box over the text, like I used to do in Acrobat).
Thanks!