I guess the questions are: Do you want to invest in a subscription to In Design/Creative Cloud for this process? And is it worth it to you to take on the resposibility/liability of doing your own revisions and submitting those spot on layouts yourself?
InDesign is probably the best tool available for creating "press-ready" book production materials. I'm biased, of course, since I use the program for regularly doing that work. As I suspect your freelancing formatting hot shot does and most folks do in the production graphics industry. It's not necessarily the end product for those materials — InDesign is used to create them, but most workflows export InDesign layouts to Acrobat PDF files for printing — but I'd strongly suggest that there's no better software tool for getting your layouts spot on.
Similarly, for review and revision of your layouts before submitting the final layouts for printing, it may or may not be the best solution for you.
If you trust your layout freelancer, or want to trust but verify his work, using Acrobat PDFs has real advantages.
- First and foremost, is that any changes are made on a level above the critical page layouts, using PDF commenting tools.Which protects your layouts from being inadvertently damaged by problematic edits/changes.
- Second, and nearly as important, is that you can create, track and confirm those requested changes both on your side and your freelancer's side. This makes it easy on the administrative side to specify exactly what changes need to be made, run a separate "punch list" broken down by page and individual comment that makes it easy to track down those change requests one by one and have your freelancer make them, and, when you get the revised version, easily confirm the changes have been made correctly and/or have a documented record to discuss on the occasion when your changes didn't go the way you expected.
- Third, and significantly, with Reader-enabled PDFs you don't have to invest in buying InDesign on your end of the process. All you have to do is download the free Adobe Reader utility and you can use that program, or most all web browsers, to take advantage of the first two advantages.
If you want to take on control — and the responsibility/liability — of making those changes to your layouts yourself, using InDesign to make changes yourself will do that.
- You have very good text editing tools. It's much easier to edit text in layouts with InDesign — especially when using InDesign's Edit with Story Editor functions. The tools to spell-check, find/change and format text with Story Editor are far superior to what you get in Acrobat, and rival (as well as somewhat mirror) the functionality for doing that work in MSWord and/or Scrivener.
- You have tools to find/track changes within InDesign, though I'd contend that they're not as robust as the tools available in Adobe Acrobat/Reader. That's my personal impression. I wouldn't be surprised to find others may contend differently.
- One downside is that if everybody's working in their edits/changes on InDesign documents, version control becomes a real issue. Scrupulous workflow processing and meticulous file management can mitigate the issue, but passing PDF files for review and revisions completely sidestep those issues with a minimum of effort.
- Another downside is that even minor changes to your copy can conceivably affect your layouts. Maybe even significantly. And I mean no disrespect by offering that most every time an author says there are only a few "minor changes" the end result turns out to be more significant to page layout than anyone intends. Especially as the cycles of review/revisions grows.
If you do choose to use InDesign yourself, I strongly recommend that you take Eugene Tyson's last statement to heart and keep your book designer in the loop to ensure your formatting is spot on when you present your final press-ready materials to your printer. And if you plan to be doing this kind of work on a regular basis, it may be worth considering the additional tools (InCopy/WordsFlow) mentioned by the folks at IDEAS_Training. But if you're only doing this a couple of times, or only once or twice a year, I'd strongly recommend for file control and layout integrity reasons that you use a PDF-based review/revisions process.
Hope this helps,
Randy