Skip to main content
Inspiring
January 15, 2025
Question

Is ClearImageLinkMetadata still useful in 2025?

  • January 15, 2025
  • 2 replies
  • 446 views

Hi,

 

I haven't used InDesign in a few years. I learned it for a specific project (a full magazine layout) and - with the help of this community - the end result looked the same despite dropping from 500Mb to 1Mb.

 

It was someone here that turned me on to ClearImageLinkMetadata to reduce those file sizes (apologies for not remembering who, because the difference was considerable enough for me to make a mental note to always do this if I have to use InDesign again).

 

But this was a long time ago, and I have been tasked to edit a couple of pages from the old mag project and re-export a new updated version of it. So of course, my first thought was "Do I still need to run that 3rd party ClearImageLinkMetadata tool before the final export to filter out hundreds of Mb worth of bloat?"

 

Or does InDesign finally offer the option to filter image metadata out during export (like it does with PSD layers that aren't turned on)?

 

Thanks!

2 replies

Pariah Burke
Community Expert
Community Expert
January 19, 2025

In most workflows the presence of metadata is becoming more useful, not less. That said, InDesign doesn't concern itself much with final file size as no one distributes INDD documents. All the compression is done (if at all) by the export filters, for example, when exporting as EPUB or PDF you can choose the quality and resolution of images. Slimming down non-InDesign-format files is better left as the domain of the applications that directly edit those file formats.

 

If you want to reduce file size of a PDF as much as possible, then use Acrobat's built-in tool for that. In Acrobat, disable "the New Acrobat" and then choose File > Save As Other > Optimized PDF. 

 

 

Under S.Author
Inspiring
January 19, 2025

We're talking about -- in some cases -- as much as 500mb worth of bloat for a PDF that shouldn't be larger than 1mb. That's 500% bloat. I'm not sure what this Metadata could possibly contain that would make this trade-off worthwhile.

 

I will be running this script before every single magazine export going forward, unless someone can tell me why I shouldn't. For 500mb, I expect the magazine to come with audio files narrating every page. Not just invisible info that doesn't actually affect the UX.

 

I'm starting to get the sense that Adobe may be purposely including the Metadata bloat (when it could easily offer us to filter it out) to artificially increase Acrobat's value in the workflow. With ClearImageLinkMetadata, I don't need Acrobat at all to build a lightweight PDF magazine. Just PS+ID.

Robert at ID-Tasker
Legend
January 15, 2025
quote

[...] Or does InDesign now make such tools obsolete by handling the metadata bloat better on its own?


By @Under S.

 

Unfortunately, whatever goes in - goes out. 

 

Under S.Author
Inspiring
January 15, 2025

To be clear, are you saying this 3rd party Metadata clearing tool is still needed in 2025 to achieve normal 1-5mb file sizes for regular 24-page magazines?

Robert at ID-Tasker
Legend
January 15, 2025

If you don't need this metadata - nothing bad happen if you run this tool anyway 😉 

 

I'm pretty sure that this "problem" is at the far end of priorities right now ...