Eugene,
Thanks for your feedback, I agree if I wanted to get the same result everytime and everywhere.
You are right, let me show you:
You will notice a subtle difference between each version, even if your monitor is way different than mine: it seems that the InDesign version doesn't use any colour profile, colours are much blander, duller.
Maybe we can't use that feature (shared InDesign document) to work with high quality / rich colored pictures?
But it seems possible as the PDF works fine. What do you think?
Thanks for you help,
Regards
Honestly don't see a huge difference between the two.
There is some artifacting going on in the one for Review online - I can see that without even zooming in.
Here's my take on it - it's just my personal opinion:
Even if one of the reviewers is in a room with no windows and fluorescent lights on an uncalibrated monitor the colours would be different to someone sitting in a room with a monitor perpendicular to a window with good daylight and no lights on in the room.
Share for review is really only to make text/image change edits - I wouldn't count on it for someone to start colour correcting images or even talking about it.
Share for review, in my opinion, is to review the content/placement/edits etc.
If someone is concerned about colour - you could send them a colour proof PDF or some pages of colour proofs to alieve their anxiety.
However, unless you get a RIPed proof from the printer viewed on a colour-corrected monitor in the correct lighting - you are going to see different values from someone else.
--------------
@rob day What do you think about this one?