Skip to main content
Cliff_DeYoung6815
Participant
September 25, 2026
Question

Lightroom Classic 15.5.1: Landscape AI Masking Performance Degrades from 6 Seconds to 86 Seconds Until Windows Reboot

  • September 25, 2026
  • 4 replies
  • 55 views

Summary

Landscape AI masking in Lightroom Classic 15.5/15.5.1 progressively becomes extremely slow during normal use on my system.

Immediately after a Windows reboot, a Landscape mask typically completes in approximately 6–7 seconds. After continued Lightroom use, the same operation on comparable images can take 60–90+ seconds.

I captured a controlled example in Lightroom Classic 15.5.1:

Degraded state before Windows reboot: 86.68 seconds
Normal state immediately after Windows reboot: 6.51 seconds

This represents approximately a 13.3× slowdown.

Restarting Lightroom does not consistently restore normal performance. Rebooting Windows restores the fast Landscape masking performance.

The problem appears specific to, or particularly severe with, Landscape AI masking. Other AI masks such as Sky and Subject do not exhibit the same degree of degradation in my testing.

System Configuration

Operating System: Windows 11
CPU: Intel Core i9-14900K
RAM: 64 GB
GPU: AMD Radeon RX 9070, 16 GB dedicated VRAM
AMD driver: 32.0.31044.16
Lightroom Classic: 15.5.1

The problem was also observed with Lightroom Classic 15.5.

I also have Lightroom Classic 14.5.2 installed separately on the same computer for comparison. Landscape masking in 14.5.2 remains substantially faster and does not exhibit the same severe degradation in my testing.

Steps to Reproduce

  1. Reboot Windows.
  2. Launch Lightroom Classic 15.5.1.
  3. Open a RAW landscape photograph that has not previously had a Landscape AI mask generated.
  4. Select Masking → Landscape and allow Lightroom to identify the landscape features.
  5. Record the processing time.
  6. Continue normal editing and perform Landscape masking on additional previously unanalyzed images.
  7. Eventually Landscape masking becomes dramatically slower.
  8. Test additional new images once the slowdown occurs.
  9. Close and restart Lightroom and retest.
  10. Reboot Windows, reopen Lightroom 15.5.1, and repeat the Landscape mask test.

Expected Result

Landscape AI masking should continue to complete in approximately the same amount of time throughout a Lightroom session, allowing for normal differences in image complexity.

Actual Result

Landscape masking initially completes in roughly 6–10 seconds, but after Lightroom has been used for some time, processing can increase to 60–90+ seconds per image.

Once the degraded state occurs, additional new images also process very slowly.

A Windows reboot restores Landscape masking to approximately 6–7 seconds.

Controlled Before/After Example

I captured Windows Task Manager GPU information while Lightroom Classic 15.5.1 was exhibiting the problem.

Before reboot — degraded state

Landscape masking required:

86.68 seconds

During the operation, Windows Task Manager showed sustained very high activity on the Radeon RX 9070 3D GPU engine for most of the Landscape analysis.

At completion, Task Manager showed approximately:

Dedicated GPU memory: 11.4 / 16.0 GB
Shared GPU memory: 1.7 / 47.7 GB
Total GPU memory: approximately 13.1 GB

Screenshot attached showing the 86.68-second processing time and GPU activity.

Screenshot also attached showing GPU status following the slow Landscape operation.

After Windows reboot — normal state

Without changing Lightroom versions, hardware, or GPU drivers, I rebooted Windows and repeated the test.

Landscape masking completed in:

6.51 seconds

The GPU graph shows a short burst of GPU activity rather than the prolonged high GPU utilization seen during the degraded 86.68-second operation.

Screenshots are attached showing the 6.51-second Landscape operation and GPU status following the operation.

The only significant intervention between the 86.68-second test and the 6.51-second test was rebooting Windows.

Additional Testing and Observations

I have spent considerable time trying to isolate this problem.

Performance progressively degrades

Landscape masking can initially operate normally and then become progressively slower during continued Lightroom use.

In previous testing I have observed Landscape operations progressing from approximately:

10 seconds → 34 seconds → 54–72 seconds

on previously unanalyzed images.

In another controlled comparison, Landscape masking measured:

6.5 seconds immediately after reboot vs. approximately 48 seconds after the problem developed.

The current screenshots demonstrate an even more severe example:

6.51 seconds vs. 86.68 seconds.

Previously analyzed images can behave differently

Once Lightroom has analyzed an image for Landscape masking, repeating the Landscape operation on that image can sometimes complete in only a few seconds.

Therefore, I have tried to use previously unanalyzed images when testing the underlying Landscape AI processing performance.

This distinction may be important when attempting to reproduce the issue.

Other AI operations are affected to some extent

When the degraded state develops, I have also observed substantially slower AI-update operations associated with other Lightroom functions.

For example, in one test:

AI update following Remove: approximately 26 seconds normally vs. 70 seconds degraded.

AI update following Denoise: approximately 20.5 seconds normally vs. 78.5 seconds degraded.

However, Landscape masking is the most obvious and repeatable manifestation of the problem.

Sky and Subject masks remain fast

During testing, Select Sky and Select Subject continued to perform relatively normally even when Landscape masking had become extremely slow.

This suggests the problem is not simply that all Lightroom AI masking becomes slow.

GPU acceleration test

I also tested Lightroom with GPU acceleration disabled.

Disabling GPU acceleration did not resolve the performance problem. In one test the processing times were approximately 90 seconds with GPU acceleration vs. 88 seconds without it.

Lightroom Classic 14.5.2 comparison

I installed Lightroom Classic 14.5.2 alongside the current version specifically for comparison.

On the same Windows computer, same Radeon RX 9070, and same image library, Landscape masking in Lightroom Classic 14.5.2 remains fast and does not exhibit the severe progressive slowdown I am seeing in Lightroom Classic 15.5/15.5.1.

This makes the behavior appear to be a regression introduced somewhere after Lightroom Classic 14.5.2.

GPU / Memory Observation

There appears to be a relationship between the performance degradation and changes in Lightroom's GPU workload and GPU-memory behavior.

After a Windows reboot, Landscape masking is fast and GPU activity associated with the operation is brief.

Once the problem develops, Landscape masking can cause sustained high GPU activity for a minute or longer.

I have also observed differences in dedicated versus shared GPU-memory usage between normal and degraded states.

I am not claiming that this proves a VRAM leak or that GPU memory management is necessarily the root cause. I am including the information because the GPU behavior changes significantly when the Landscape masking slowdown occurs and may help Adobe reproduce or diagnose the issue.

The fact that rebooting Windows restores normal performance, while restarting Lightroom does not consistently do so, may also be diagnostically significant.

Attached Screenshots

1. Slow Landscape Masking — before reboot
Lightroom Classic 15.5.1 Landscape AI operation taking 86.68 seconds, with Windows Task Manager showing sustained Radeon RX 9070 GPU activity.

2. GPU status following slow Landscape masking
GPU and GPU-memory state after the degraded Landscape operation.

3. Fast Landscape Masking — after Windows reboot
Same Lightroom Classic 15.5.1 installation after reboot. Landscape masking completes in 6.51 seconds, with Task Manager GPU activity visible.

4. GPU status following fast Landscape masking
GPU and GPU-memory state following the normal-speed Landscape operation.

    4 replies

    Cliff_DeYoung6815
    Participant
    October 2, 2026

    Additional test: After completing the 1.6-second Landscape test in LrC 14.5.2, I closed 14.5.2 and reopened LrC 15.6, still without rebooting Windows. I then tested Landscape masking again on the same photo used for the 14.5.2 test. In LrC 15.6, the same Landscape operation took 47 seconds, compared with 1.6 seconds in LrC 14.5.2.

    This means that closing and reopening LrC 15.6 releases the GPU memory allocations, but does not restore normal Landscape masking performance. Historically, a full Windows reboot restores LrC 15.x Landscape performance temporarily. This suggests that some part of the degraded state may persist outside the Lightroom process even after Lightroom is closed, while LrC 14.5.2 remains unaffected by that state.

    Srishti Bali
    Community Manager
    Community Manager
    October 2, 2026

    Hi ​@Cliff_DeYoung6815 

     

    Thanks for reaching out and for sharing this detailed analysis. I’m sharing it with our Product team for further review.

    We appreciate the time and effort you’ve taken to provide these details.

    Thanks, Srishti Bali | Community & Engagement Strategist, Digital Imaging | Adobe
    Cliff_DeYoung6815
    Participant
    October 2, 2026

    Update – October 3, 2026

    Following the suggestion above regarding the AMD graphics driver, I performed additional testing with a clean installation of a newer AMD graphics driver and a direct comparison between Lightroom Classic 15.6 and 14.5.2.

    Based on these tests, the Landscape masking slowdown still occurs in Lightroom Classic 15.6 and appears to be related to a broader GPU/resource utilization issue within the newer Lightroom version rather than simply the AMD driver.

    AMD driver clean-install test

    Based on the suggestion that the graphics driver might be contributing to the problem, I used AMD Cleanup Utility in Safe Mode to completely remove my existing AMD graphics driver.

    Previous driver:

    • AMD Radeon RX 9070
    • Driver version: 32.0.31044.16
    • Driver date: 9/9/2026

    I then performed a clean installation of AMD Adrenalin 26.9.2. This is newer than the driver version that had been suggested for testing.

    New driver:

    • AMD Radeon RX 9070
    • Driver version: 32.0.32015.2008
    • Driver date: 9/28/2026

    The clean driver installation did not resolve the Lightroom problem.

    Lightroom Classic 15.6 test

    Immediately after rebooting with the clean AMD driver installation:

    • Dedicated GPU memory before Lightroom: 2.3 GB / 16 GB
    • Shared GPU memory: 0.2 GB
    • GPU utilization: approximately 2%

    I opened Lightroom Classic 15.6 and created a Landscape mask.

    Initial Landscape masking time: 9 seconds

    Immediately afterward:

    • Dedicated GPU memory: 9.6 GB
    • Shared GPU memory: 0.6 GB
    • GPU utilization returned to approximately 0–1%

    I then stopped benchmarking and edited normally.

    I edited approximately 15 photos, including normal Develop adjustments, creating some new masks, and updating AI masks after using Remove.

    After this normal editing activity, Landscape masking slowed dramatically again.

    Landscape masking time: 58 seconds

    During the slow Landscape operation:

    • Dedicated GPU memory reached approximately 15.6 GB of 16 GB
    • Shared GPU memory reached approximately 4.3 GB
    • GPU utilization reached 100%

    After the mask completed:

    • Dedicated GPU memory remained at approximately 12.1 GB
    • Shared GPU memory remained at approximately 1.0 GB
    • GPU utilization returned to approximately 1%

    An important observation is that before Lightroom entered this degraded state, Landscape masking did not drive GPU utilization above approximately 50%.

    Also, repeatedly creating Landscape masks by itself does not appear to cause the slowdown. The slowdown develops after doing normal editing work involving other operations. Landscape masking appears to be exposing or measuring the degraded GPU state rather than necessarily causing it.

    Direct comparison with Lightroom Classic 14.5.2

    I then performed what I believe is the most useful comparison so far.

    I closed Lightroom Classic 15.6 but did not reboot Windows.

    After closing 15.6, GPU usage dropped back to:

    • Dedicated GPU memory: approximately 2.4 GB
    • Shared GPU memory: approximately 0.3 GB
    • GPU utilization: 0%

    I then opened Lightroom Classic 14.5.2 in the same Windows session, using the same RX 9070 and the same newly installed AMD driver, and tested Landscape masking on the same photo.

    Landscape masking in LrC 14.5.2 completed in:

    1.6 seconds

    During that operation:

    • GPU utilization never exceeded approximately 15%
    • Dedicated and shared GPU memory showed essentially no change.

    For comparison:

    LrC 15.6: 58 seconds, 100% GPU utilization, approximately 15.6 GB dedicated VRAM peak and 4.3 GB shared GPU memory peak.

    LrC 14.5.2: 1.6 seconds, less than 15% GPU utilization, essentially no change in GPU memory.

    These tests were performed on the same computer, same Windows session, same Radeon RX 9070, same freshly installed AMD driver, and same photo. Windows was not rebooted between the 15.6 and 14.5.2 tests.

    This makes me believe the slow Landscape masking is a symptom of a broader GPU/resource utilization problem that develops during an LrC 15.x editing session. Closing LrC 15.6 releases the GPU resources, and LrC 14.5.2 continues to perform Landscape masking extremely quickly on the same system.

    I hope these additional results help isolate the issue.

    johnrellis
    Legend
    September 25, 2026

    [View this post in your web browser. It contains formatting and images that don't appear in email.]

    GPU: AMD Radeon RX 9070, 16 GB dedicated VRAM
    AMD driver: 32.0.31044.16

     

    Was that driver automatically installed by Windows Update?  The AMD web site lists two newest drivers for the RX 9070:

    https://www.amd.com/en/support/downloads/drivers.html/graphics/radeon-rx/radeon-rx-9000-series/amd-radeon-rx-9070.html

     

    Adrenalin 26.8.1 (WHQL), 2026-08-20 (Windows Driver Store 32.0.31041.1004)

    Adrenalin 26.9.1 (non-WHQL), 2026-09-03 (Windows Driver Store 32.0.31041.3013)

     

    Your current driver isn’t listed. The symptoms you describe smell like a buggy driver, so I suggest trying those two drivers, doing a clean uninstall before each.  

     

    Start with 26.8.1 first, since it’s WHQL-certified, meaning it gets a little bit extra testing.