Skip to main content
Participant
February 12, 2019
Question

Lightroom Enhance Detail

  • February 12, 2019
  • 9 replies
  • 950 views

Has anyone else managed to see any positive results (or any difference at all) when using this new feature?

I've tried it on several RAW images (Canon 1DX Mk 2), looking in areas which are both sharp and in focus, but also areas which are outside the focal plane.

Looking at the with and without enhance detail in the preview, I cannot see a single pixel which looks any different.

The release notes mention finer detail in large prints. I've recently prepared a number of images for printing large (36" x 24") from Lightroom, so was keen to see the difference. I used the same RAW files, used Enhance detail, then exported the output from the ehanced DNG file. The file sizes compared to the output from the RAW were virtually identical, and again pixel peeping shows zero difference that I can see.

Maybe I'm doing something wrong?

    This topic has been closed for replies.

    9 replies

    Community Expert
    March 2, 2019

    Enhance details really only does something for the Xtrans sensor files and for really rare circumstances in all other cameras. Even there it is only useful if you print absolutely gigantically large. Otherwise there really is no benefit to it. I wrote about some of the rare circumstances here: Jao's photo blog: Enhanced details and what kind of images it helps with These circumstances only happen in very rare cases where you see the weaknesses of the Bayer array sensor crop up and again its utility is very low if you don't print at the 10 feet large size that my examples are shown at. Even at 4 feet high the artifacts are hard to see except looking at the print in closeup.

    Participating Frequently
    March 2, 2019

    This update was really meant for Fuji shooters such as myself but it's not working at all for me. It takes a good 10 minutes to go through the process of "enhancing" and then it either gives me a totally screwed up picture with colors and patterns out of a bad LSD trip or it gives me nothing at all, like I didn't do anything. I am so beyond frustrated with Adobe at this point. How they have not yet managed to figure out how to properly read an X-trans sensor with the money and resources they have is nothing short of astounding. I unfortunately use Photoshop for my infrared photography, which I use an old Canon for, otherwise I would ditch Adobe in a heartbeat and go to Alien Skin's Exposure X4 for everything. This update is pathetic. It takes forever, uses tons and tons of GPU, and doesn't give me any usable results. What a waste of time!

    johnrellis
    Legend
    March 2, 2019

    Please post details of your issue in the official Adobe feedback forum, where Adobe wants all product feedback: Lightroom Classic CC | Photoshop Family Customer Community . Product developers read everything posted there (and sometimes engage) but rarely participate in this forum.  Upload one of the problem raws to Dropbox or similar and include the sharing link.  Include a screen shot of  1:1 view in Develop illustrating what you don't like. 

    Known Participant
    February 12, 2019

    I'm seeing a good difference on my Fuji RAW files, but it's much more subtle on my Sony files. 

    I'm also having an odd issue with cut-out squares in some files when doing the enhancement.

    TheDigitalDog
    Inspiring
    February 12, 2019

    Enhanced Detail will range for doing absolutely nothing visually to producing in best case (according to internal Adobe testing with Siemens Star resolution charts) 30% increase of resolution (NOT increase of pixels!). There is of course a before and after preview and the ideal zoom ratio to examine whether it's worthwhile converting the data to a linear DNG. So no, you're not necessarily doing anything wrong or seeing anything wrong. YMMV.

    Author “Color Management for Photographers" & "Photoshop CC Color Management/pluralsight"
    Legend
    February 12, 2019

    Put the DNG on a layer above the RAW and set to Difference mode to see the enhancements.

    Ricky336
    Community Expert
    Community Expert
    February 12, 2019

    For my files, I haven't noticed a big difference either. There is a small difference, but nothing major.

    From the Adobe Blog about Enhance Details:

    Enhance Details | Adobe Blog

    99jon
    Legend
    February 12, 2019

    The 8.2 release has been rolling out in the last few hours but is now official. I have a couple of examples on my blog which also includes updates to LRCC. Scroll towards the bottom of the page for LR Classic and Enhance Details.

    https://99jon.blogspot.com/2019/02/lightroom-february-2019-updates.html

    99jon
    Legend
    February 12, 2019

    The enhanced DNG should be much larger (file size) because it contains the original raw data and the demosaiced RGB data. But the pixel dimensions will not increase. I would say that if the magnified preview shows nothing worthwhile, there is little point in rendering the enhanced file. I think this is a tool for special subjects, not for general use on all images.

    john beardsworth
    Community Expert
    Community Expert
    February 12, 2019

    You're doing nothing wrong - the impact is subtle.

    Try exporting an original and an enhanced version to PS as layers and set the top one's blending mode to difference. When you zoom in 1:1, you may or may not see some effects.