Skip to main content
Rikk Flohr-Retired
Adobe Employee
June 11, 2026
Question

P: Assisted Culling Feedback Thread (LrC)

Assisted Culling is now generally available in Lightroom Classic

TL; DR: Assisted Culling has graduated from Early Access to General Availability. It gives you a fast, reviewable first pass on large shoots: it surfaces your strongest frames and sets aside the obvious rejects, so you spend less time comparing near-duplicates. You stay in control: review everything, adjust the thresholds, and override any call. If you tried it back in October 2025, it's substantially more accurate now, especially for wedding, event, group, and portrait work. We'd love for you to give it another look and tell us what you think in this thread. 

 

What it does 

Open an album or collection, run a cull, and Assisted Culling analyzes your images against the criteria you choose: Subject Sharpness, Eye Sharpness, Eyes Open, exposure, and more. It marks Selects and Rejects, shows you why behind every call, and leaves the final decision to you. 

How far it's come since Early Access 

  • February 2026: Expanded from individual portraits to multi-person scenes: weddings, events, and group photos. Better eye detection in dense scenes, cleaner separation when people are close together, and fewer false "eyes closed" results.  

  • April 2026: Much-improved handling of shallow depth-of-field, so shots with intentional background blur are kept rather than rejected as out-of-focus. Retrained reject detection that can flag an image under multiple reasons at once (Exposure Issues with a sensitivity slider, Documents, Misfires). Scores no longer recalculate when you switch preview sizes. 

  • June 2026 (GA) 

  • Faces: per-face Eye Sharpness and Eyes Open scores for group and multi-person shots. Click on any face to see exactly how it was scored. 

  • More reliable Eyes Open results in larger groups. 

  • A clearer review of workflow and in-product guidance, so the assistive, reviewable nature is obvious from the first run. 

Getting started 

Open an album, then choose Assisted Culling › Cull. Full walkthrough here.

  

FAQs 

Q: Where is Assisted Culling available? 

A: Lightroom Desktop and Lightroom Classic. 

 

Q: Does the AI decide for me? 

A: No. Assisted Culling makes a first pass that you review. You can adjust how strict each criterion is and override any Select or Reject at any time. Nothing is final until you say so. 

 

Q: What happens to my Rejects? Are they deleted? 

A: No. Rejects are simply grouped for your review and stay in your album. You decide whether to keep, label, move, or delete them. Nothing is removed unless you choose to. 

 

Q: What kind of photos work best today? 

A: Individual portraits and multi-person scenes: weddings, events, and group photos. 

 

Q: Can I keep working while Assisted Culling runs? 

A: Yes. While Assisted Culling analyzes your images, you can review, rate, and edit them as usual. Analysis stops if you turn off the culling filters or switch to a different album or source. 

 

Q: Does Assisted Culling re-analyze the same photos every time I run it? 

A: No. Once an image has been analyzed, its scores are cached and reused in future culling sessions. If you edit an image, its scores are recalculated the next time you run Assisted Culling on it. 

 

Q: Can I adjust how strict the culling is? 

A: Yes. Each criterion can be toggled on or off, and Subject Sharpness, Eye Sharpness, and Exposure Issues include sensitivity sliders for finer control. 

 

Q: Does it work for wildlife, sports, or landscapes? 

A: Assisted Culling is currently tuned for people-focused photography: portraits, weddings, events, and groups. You can run it on other types of photos, but results may be less reliable for now. 

 

Q: Do I need to pay extra? 

A: No. Assisted Culling is included in your existing Lightroom subscription. 

  

Feedback 

This is the place for it. We read every reply. When you post, please include: 

  • App version and platform 

  • System details 

  • Example images (optional, but they help a lot) 

Kwamina Arthur, Product Manager, Lightroom 

 

    77 replies

    remov_b4_flight
    Known Participant
    July 10, 2026

    I hope that Lua plugin & smart collection search term accessible for Assisted culling analysis results.

    Translate
    gegjr
    Inspiring
    July 9, 2026

    How the heck do turn off or disable Assisted Culling?

    Translate
    "In the End, we will remember not the words of our enemies, but the silence of our friends."~Martin Luther King, Jr.
    Zealous_fantasy5D53
    Known Participant
    July 5, 2026

    This is a waste of time. 3 people: 1 with sunglasses, 2 looking away with eyes closed = all three eyes open. And i have hundreds like that. Same with sharpness - delete good ones, keep junk. Even statistical guessing would net better success rate. Maybe ask the latest AI model to fix it!

    Translate
    Participating Frequently
    July 16, 2026

    It's shockingly awful. I would like to meet one person who uses this with any success. 

    Translate
    Participant
    June 29, 2026

    Besides the tool being very slow. 

    1. I observed it doesn’t use the full resolution image by default but some kind of preview > all the images where “out of focus” which isn’t true. 
    2. why is there no button to start, pause the culling for example only on a selection? And a button to re-trigger the analysis (for example after triggering 1:1 previews) 
    3. There is no setting for the open-eye-strictness. I wanted to use it to select the best pic of a group shot out of 40 images. It wasn’t possible it was rejecting 2 images - that’s it > not helpful
    Translate
    Participating Frequently
    June 28, 2026

    It would be nice if this worked for subjects other than people.

     

    Wedding and events are not the only kinds of photography that Lightroom users do…!

    Translate
    Participating Frequently
    July 5, 2026

    Also weddings and events are not only photos of people!

    Translate
    Known Participant
    June 27, 2026

    Also, the new Assisted Culling feature in v15.4.1 is completely useless and unusable. It is painfully slow. As seen in Screenshot 2026-06-27 at 22.44.36.jpg, when "Faces" is active, the Library module becomes critically sluggish and lagging, regardless of whether "Show overlays" is checked or not.

    I see absolutely no point in adding features like this if they cannot optimize them to run fast. Standard previews are already fully generated, yet it runs like absolute garbage on both my Mac Studio and MacBook Pro. Why does Lightroom Classic become more of a mess with every single update? Is Adobe hiring vibe coders now? 😂

     

    Translate
    Participant
    June 27, 2026

    Just ran culling on a set of Street and Cityscape pictures I took last month.  Of my 14 selects, it rejected 8 and suggested keeping other inferior shots.  So not much use to me.

    Translate
    edcphoto
    Participant
    June 25, 2026

    Just ran this for the first time. Out of 51 frames it caught 3 and missed 6, not terribly accurate. Some were partially closed eyes but they were close enough they should have been caught. See one example.

    Translate
    wilhelm medetz
    Participating Frequently
    June 24, 2026

    Update for the memory leak problem on Windows 11

    The following is a simpler scenario where I can reproduce the memory leak.

    • Create a new catalog.
    • Import 800 photos (shot on an iPhone 11/12 with Lightroom Mobile).
    • Built standard previews for all photos.
    • Start Address lookup + Duplicates detection + Face detection and wait until all background tasks are finished.
    • Optimize catalog.
    • Restart LrC - 1.2 GB memory usage (displayed in Windows Task Manager), idle CPU usage.
    • Start Assisted Culling analysis background task.
    • After analyzing 170 photos LrC memory usage is up to 18.7 GB.

    Same behavior when GPU usage is disabled.

    Translate
    Participating Frequently
    June 23, 2026

    Stacking: Not being able to use stacks across folders renders it useless to me. If I can see files from several folders at once, either by Show Subfolders or by selecting more than one folder, then why don’t stacks work that way? It’s not like stacks are real—they are just concepts represented visually. If a stack is in folder A, and another image from the stack is in folder B, then you could just show the stack in both places. Then if two folders with the same stack are selected, just show one stack.

    Assisted Culling: Please make it more clear how to turn this off. Most of us don’t shoot events. Another barrier to use is that if it fails ever, it’s useless. Having to review what Lightroom thinks is no good negates any time savings. (I feel like I might not be understanding the utility of this feature properly.)

    This is one of the biggest problems with data provided by Ai in general. If you can only believe it 65% of the time, then what’s the point? Do the work yourself, or risk getting burned.

    Duplicate Detection: It’s still working on detecting duplicates for a library of 135k files, so I can’t yet comment on how well it works.

    There are two options for what to do with Duplicates. One is Remove from Catalog, which leaves the images on disk where they are, and the other is Delete from disk. This works the same way as “Remove From Catalog” does, and it’s not really an accurately-stated option. It doesn’t remove anything from disk (unless your files are on a server, and then it warns you), it just moves the file to the trash. The trash is on the disk. Why doesn’t it say “Move file to trash”? “Delete from disk” sounds pretty scary and unrecoverable.

    I’m curious about the scenario where removing it from the catalog but leaving it on disk makes sense. You would end up with orphaned files. Maybe if the file(s) are being managed by another app?

     

    Translate
    john beardsworth
    Community Expert
    Community Expert
    June 28, 2026

    Stacking: Not being able to use stacks across folders renders it useless to me. If I can see files from several folders at once, either by Show Subfolders or by selecting more than one folder, then why don’t stacks work that way? It’s not like stacks are real—they are just concepts represented visually. If a stack is in folder A, and another image from the stack is in folder B, then you could just show the stack in both places. Then if two folders with the same stack are selected, just show one stack.

     

    Stacking is in individual folders, as it always was since Lr1, but is also available in collections.

    So when processing multiple folders as a single shoot, add the photos to a collection.

     

    Translate