Skip to main content
Inspiring
April 3, 2019
Answered

Transfering flags, ratings and metadata on reimport?

  • April 3, 2019
  • 3 replies
  • 1992 views

Hi!

My catalogue became too messy - there was a singe directory for each shooting date all in one parent folder. There's no way to reorganize it as I realized after a research, so I reimported them all into new catalogue with appropriate settings. All went fine, but there's no flags and rating data anymore.

What can I do to "import" this info into my new catalogue or reimport the old one in a proper fashion to save all that info? "Import from another catalogue" does not work as it saves old folder structure and there's no option to ovveride it.
Is there a solution?

Yeah, I kept the copy of old catalogue and photos so I can do it all over again if there's a way to properly handle this.

This topic has been closed for replies.
Correct answer Anri Orlow

You know, that's very bad design approach, if the software promises broad possibilities but in reality restricts user in such a stupid way. It does not matter how it's "convenient" for somebody to use catalogues, smart collections and filters messing up the folder structure, it's not for me.

Despite that I managed to do what I needed.

At first I tried to look at the .lrcat file with sql tools and maybe merge the data I needed into the fresh catalogue. That turned out such a mess! No wonder LR is so slow anymore. So I found another workaround:

1. Use filter to show all picked photos in your old cat. Export the originals into an empty folder;

2. Use CMD (in Windows) to get the list of all the files in that folder, the command looks like that - dir C:\your_folder /s /b /-c / >C:\fileslist.txt;

3. Than open the fileslist.txt in Sublime Text and do a "search and replace" with regexp - first, to delete full path, \S*\\ replace with nothing, second, replace new lines \n with a space;

4. You've got a list of file names! Now copy it and go to LR, turn on text search (filename > contains) and paste what you've copied. You've got all the "picked" files! Select them all and "pick";

???

5. Profit!

But it's not flawless. The problem is if the names have spaces - "dng 001.dng" would search for names containing both "dng" and "001.dng" independently, that's a mess. Also, if you have duplicating names (if you shoot much you probably do) there's a misstep too. You will need to manually check such things, screenshots help somehow.

Adobe, such things are shame. Seriously.

3 replies

Anri OrlowAuthorCorrect answer
Inspiring
April 4, 2019

You know, that's very bad design approach, if the software promises broad possibilities but in reality restricts user in such a stupid way. It does not matter how it's "convenient" for somebody to use catalogues, smart collections and filters messing up the folder structure, it's not for me.

Despite that I managed to do what I needed.

At first I tried to look at the .lrcat file with sql tools and maybe merge the data I needed into the fresh catalogue. That turned out such a mess! No wonder LR is so slow anymore. So I found another workaround:

1. Use filter to show all picked photos in your old cat. Export the originals into an empty folder;

2. Use CMD (in Windows) to get the list of all the files in that folder, the command looks like that - dir C:\your_folder /s /b /-c / >C:\fileslist.txt;

3. Than open the fileslist.txt in Sublime Text and do a "search and replace" with regexp - first, to delete full path, \S*\\ replace with nothing, second, replace new lines \n with a space;

4. You've got a list of file names! Now copy it and go to LR, turn on text search (filename > contains) and paste what you've copied. You've got all the "picked" files! Select them all and "pick";

???

5. Profit!

But it's not flawless. The problem is if the names have spaces - "dng 001.dng" would search for names containing both "dng" and "001.dng" independently, that's a mess. Also, if you have duplicating names (if you shoot much you probably do) there's a misstep too. You will need to manually check such things, screenshots help somehow.

Adobe, such things are shame. Seriously.

dj_paige
Legend
April 4, 2019

I like the design. It makes a lot of sense to me. Lightroom does provide me with "broad possibilities" for organizing, and allows me to achieve organization that I could not have achieved using just my operating system folders. The limitation in the very specific and limited case of re-organizing by dated folders after the photos have been imported is not a situation that I have ever needed. and I'm pretty sure I will never need such a capability.

Just Shoot Me
Legend
April 3, 2019

You are wrong about Re-organizing your folder structure.

You can do it either IN LR or with the File Manager program for the OS you are using and then Reconnect the images.

I did this about a year ago to place all images shot from 2006 to 2013 in a Top Level folder called Older Pictures By Years.

But in the end you really don't need to do that. You should start looking at some of the filtering options available in LR to separate images, Filter them, so only what you need to be displayed in the Grid/Film Strip areas is showing.

Anytime you Re-import images something is going to get lost or overwritten.

Re-Importing is not the way to handle anything. It is the worst idea.

Inspiring
April 3, 2019

In-lightroom solutions do not satisfy me. Filters and all of that is not a convenient way either.

How do you propose so sort it in explorer and relink, if there's more than a thousand of photos? That's insane.

And all the hassle is caused by a single poorly-designed feature!

JohanElzenga
Community Expert
Community Expert
April 3, 2019

Select all photos in the old catalog and then use ‘Metadata - Save Metadata to Files’. Then import into the new catalog. The only problem will be that if you have reorganised the images in the meantime, your old catalog will show them as ‘missing’ and won’t be able to do this until you fix that problem. If you did indeed keep a copy of the images in their own folder hierarchy, this should work fine however.

-- Johan W. Elzenga
Inspiring
April 3, 2019

Those XMPs have no rating data. Only the adjustments

JohanElzenga
Community Expert
Community Expert
April 3, 2019

https://forums.adobe.com/people/Anri+Orlow  wrote

Those XMPs have no rating data. Only the adjustments

They should have ratings (and keywords) as well.

-- Johan W. Elzenga