Skip to main content
hedonist222
Participating Frequently
October 27, 2017
Question

Unhappy with pricing strategy

  • October 27, 2017
  • 3 replies
  • 692 views

To clarify

I purchased Lightroom 5 three years ago

I use it 5 or 6 times a year a

I can afford $10 a month

I saw Lightroom classic's new features like luminosity & color masking

They're exactly what I've been waiting for

But, apparently, I have to commit $10 or so per month. Forever. Infinitely. Perpetually.

To use those features

I don't use Lightroom enough to justify a monthly subscription - forever

I use Lightroom half a dozen times a year

But when I do. I am qualified to use those 'classic only' features

It is very selfish and unfair of Adobe to twist our arms like this

Only because they want to guarantee to their shareholders that they've found a way to secure a steady and predictable source of revenue

I'm happy paying up to $150 for a standalone updated version of Lightroom

I'm very unhappy having my arm twisted into committing to a monthly subscription when I barely use the software

Adobe should really reconsider their stance

I will now definitely not purchase Lightroom classic, nor upgrade to Lightroom 6

I will even consider halting use of my purchased Lightroom 5 - out of principle

    This topic has been closed for replies.

    3 replies

    Inspiring
    October 28, 2017

    ...I will even consider halting use of my purchased Lightroom 5 - out of principle.

    That’s the ol’ fightin’ spirit, eh!? Stop cataloguing and editing your pics! Teach Adobe a thing or two, eh!?

    hedonist222
    Participating Frequently
    October 28, 2017

    No

    Move over to the competition.

    99jon
    Legend
    October 27, 2017

    I’m not sure how loyal subscribers would feel if you got all the same tools for $150.

    hedonist222
    Participating Frequently
    October 27, 2017

    That's a moot point.

    Naturally monthly subscribers would feel exploited if people who paid $150 for the same tools.

    But that's an irrelevant point.

    I'm saying Adobe should reserve monthly fees to options that warrant a monthly subscription.

    Like online storage usage, access to seminars and so on.

    JP Hess
    Inspiring
    October 27, 2017

    Unfortunately for you, Adobe has made their decision. Now you're going to have to make yours.

    Ricky336
    Community Expert
    Community Expert
    October 27, 2017

    I don't mean to sound flippant, but it looks like you have made your choice. Adobe is doing really well on the stock market. Lots of people are going for the subscription model - it is working for them it seems. Lots of happy people!

    hedonist222
    Participating Frequently
    October 27, 2017

    what has Adobe doing well on the stock market have to do with my point?

    I understand you're implying that my concerns and experience are irrelevant?

    Not to sound flipping, but are you a (sleazy) used-car salesman?

    Because that's what your post insinuated.

    Also, while you try to appear learned with your cutthroat 'stock market' comment, you should know that the effect of such a radical strategy (one off sales to subscription) takes much longer than two weeks to show effect on the stock market.