Skip to main content
dandooze
dandooze
Participant
August 29, 2021
Question

Impossible to store originals on a NAS Volume

  • August 29, 2021
  • 5 replies
  • 477 views

I honestly cannot recall from which Lightroom version it stopped working (maybe 4.3), but now every time I open Lightroom CC I am presented with this warning message stating that my NAS Volume is disconnected, when indeed Volume is mounted and correctly working.


If I then go back to the app preferences and select the same Volume, the software starts a process of "Checking your files" that never really starts, as is stuck on 0 of 5k pictures and doesn't move. 

My only way to have it working is to delete the Lightroom library file in user/pictures and at the following start Lightroom checks all the files again. Once is finished, I can close and reopen the app with no issue within the same session. The following day, I am back to square one. 

I have only 5k pictures of my Adobe cloud archive at the moment, and I was planning to slowly add my whole collection but this is simply not an acceptable workflow in the long run. 

 

Am I doing something wrong? Is the NAS option not really a reliable option?

Any clue or tips would be really appreciated

 

My system

  • My Lightroom version is the latest available 4.4, but I had the same issues with the 4.3
  • I was using a Macbook Pro, now I am using a Mac Mini M1, a different machine, same issues.
  • My NAS is a Synology DS220, quite a recent model and always updated and physically connected to the router

 

Alessandro

This topic has been closed for replies.

5 replies

Rikk Flohr_Photography
Community Manager
Rikk Flohr_PhotographyCommunity Manager
August 30, 2021

I am using a NAS (Synology) as the local storage depot in Lightroom Desktop (4.4) with no issues. 

Make sure you are mounting the NAS via SMB rather than AFP. 

Rikk Flohr: Adobe Photography Org
dandooze
dandoozeAuthor
Participant
August 30, 2021

Hey Rikk, and thanks for your message.
The NAS volume is mounted via SMB and at log-in.
I see no reason why it should not work. 

Alessandro

 

 

Timothy.Spear
Timothy.Spear
Inspiring
August 30, 2021

I have never tried a NAS with Lr. With Classic, NAS has always been very problamatic for the catelog, and occasionally questionable even for images.

I would suggest eliminating the NAS.

Also, note: you can depend on Lr to manage the cache locally of images. I have a nice high speed connection at home, so on my laptop which I really use for software development, only has a 512MB SSD; my online cataloge is over 700GB and 24K images. It downloads and maintains what I need on the fly using only about 100GB.

While my desktop, is setup to keep local copies of everything with a couple TB of space; it has the room.

 

Tim

dandooze
dandoozeAuthor
Participant
August 30, 2021

Hi Timothy, thanks for your reply
I am aware of the local cache and it's indeed enough for the files I need to work on.
My point for having a NAS is that if one day I decide to stop paying for the Cloud backup I already have all my files locally in a RAID set-up. (Not to mention if anything goes wrong with Adobe servers for some reason, which can always happen...). This is also the reason why I prefer a NAS over a local machine storage: redundancy.

Alessandro

 

Firefly Community Gallery
Adobe Firefly

Remix with Firefly Community Gallery

Thousands of free creations to fall in love with and remix in Firefly.

Explore now
Terms & ConditionsAccessibility statement
Using the community Terms of use Privacy Cookie preferences Do not sell or share my personal information ad choicesAdChoices