What Use Cases Could Justify this Enormous Price Per Successful API Call?
I was very excited to learn about this API. I held out hope that Adobe would price it to be affordable for any size business. Well, they finally released this feature, and the pricing is outrageous. They've all but priced individual developers and small and medium-sized businesses straight out of the market. If you do the math, 15 cents per successful API call is extremely expensive, especially when you consider the cost of a desktop version and/or subscription of Photoshop. Used on a proper OS like Windows, you can perform many of the API functions programmatically already, as I have done for many clients.
Take the current subscription price for Photoshop (202x). Currently, the prices for a year's subscription for all products (PS, AI, Lr, etc.) round up to ~ $700, $240 for Photoshop alone. Given the cost per successful API call of 15 cents, that translates to approximately 6 API calls per dollar. Since it's a server-to-server-based API, you have to absorb the cost yourself and allocate it to your customers.
I don’t have experience with AWS, but I don’t think you can use metering features like the kind available in Azure to provide usage data per client account. We want to use this technology to allow our users to generate mockup images and perform basic to advanced image editing. A typical online shop has between 5 to 10 images per product. Therefore, to generate images for a typical store with 300 – 1500 products, at let’s say 7 images per product (not including revisions), would yield a hefty bill of $225 - $315 (1:1 image per call). This expense cannot easily be passed on to your customer. Also, due to the limitations (seemingly by design) of this API, you’re likely to need to make more than a 1:1 call per image minimum to generate a series of diverse mockups.
It also seems to me that support is non-existent, and the documentation is vague and poorly written, lacking even the most basic details. The developer is left to infer an endpoint’s purpose by simple name, e.g., /text. I’d say that’s the status quo for Adobe, however. Judging from the support/SLA, your first-level support appears to be the staff at AWS, who likely know little or nothing about this hastily published service and will offer little comfort, let alone a solution to pressing production support issues.
Adobe should reduce the price of this service to make it available for the target audience they claim to target e.g., individual developers, SMB.

We offer three tiers of support, which give you access directly to the product team and engineers who built the API. You do not need to go through AWS, Adobe is here to support you every step of the way. You can file a support request by going to our site and clicking on "Support" and selecting the option to "Submit a ticket." I'll share the link here also: 
