3000 ppi is far from insane.
If the originals are 35mm, the pixel dimensions will be 4252 x 2835.
It appears that this scanner has a max resolution of 4800 ppi, which will result in 6803 x 4535 pixels, still a moderately sized image.
So if I were in your situation, I'd go for 4800 ppi.
Mylenium raises an important point - the qualifications of the scanner operator.
I'd say that the most important thing is to make sure that all the information from the negatives are captured - with no shadow or highlight clipping. The histogram should have ample space on both sides, which will mean a flat image, but this is easily corrected later.
Then there is the question of whether to scan as negative (resulting in a positive image) or as positive.
If getting correct colors in the scanning software is difficult, it might be better to scan as positives, and invert the images in Photoshop.
I want to ask will the Noritsu able to give archival quality results |
I take it that you by "archival quality" mean good technical quality.
("archival quality" is normally used about film or paper processed in a darkroom)
From what I can tell from a quick Google search, this seems to be a high-end scanner.
But a lot depends on the operator.