Skip to main content
lubalbs
Known Participant
October 9, 2020
Question

Ideal dimensions (not resolution) for digital image import relative to final size

  • October 9, 2020
  • 2 replies
  • 641 views

I just read this article on the 72ppi myth:https: //www.photoshopessentials.com/essentials/the-72-ppi-web-resolution-myth/ which essentially says that you don't need to worry about the ppi of your images for web/screens (for good reason).

 

I was just wondering then, what are the ideal pixel dimensions that you want to place an image at on the web or in a digital document size, relative to that document (or placeholder on the web) so that it doesn't look pixelated? For example, if I place an 800px image into an 800px wide InDesign document, it looks really crook when exported. Is there a rule of thumb, like 1.5 larger than the final export size (or viewing size on the web)? (In the above example then, a 1200px image placed into a 800px doc/web placeholder?)

This topic has been closed for replies.

2 replies

D Fosse
Community Expert
Community Expert
October 9, 2020

Basically, a web image displays on screen according to your screen resolution. If the image is 800 pixels wide, it occupies 800 of your screen pixels. So if the screen is, say, 1920 pixels wide, the image takes up 0.417 of the screen width. That's the size on screen.

 

It follows that the image doesn't really have a "size" as such. It's just pixels. Screen size depends on the pixel density of whatever screen it's seen on.

 

Enter two complications: The first is responsive web design, which has been all the rage for some years. This means the site is specially coded so that the image is scaled to fill the screen width whatever the original dimensions. That sounds nice - but personally I hate that, because all that scaling kills sharpness and turns the image to mush. Worst case it looks out of focus.

 

A fixed size image is always significantly sharper and crisper. Prepare at final size, don't scale anything.

 

The second complication is high resolution screens (4K/retina etc). The problem with that is that everything shrinks accordingly. So it has to be scaled up. That's fine for text and vector, but a huge problem for pixel-based images. One way is to upload two versions of the image, one for standard screens and one for hi-res screens, and then code the site to choose the appropriate one. But the standard way is to simply scale up. All current web browsers are set to do this when a high-resolution screen is detected. The advatage of this is that you don't have to do anything. It just works. But it doesn't look as good as it should or could.

lubalbs
lubalbsAuthor
Known Participant
October 9, 2020

Thanks for your reply. 

 

I got the first part as that's what I've been reading about.

 

My biggest issue though is InDesign. I often use it to create artwork for clients for socials (Instagram, LinkedIn banners etc) as I find it much quicker to work in than Photoshop (or digital PDF docs, which are obviously easier in InDesign). So if I've been supplied a 1000px wide image, I've previously scaled it so that it's a minimum of 72 effective ppi in InDesign. I realise ppi is now meaningless for web/screens, so I'm wondering what I should stick to as a minimum when using images in this context - should I be making sure instead that they are exported at (in the social artwork, PDF doc etc), for example, 1.5 times the original pixels dimensions of the image I'm importing? 

 

I've also found if I have an image that's going to sit 500px wide in a non-responsive web design, uploading it at 500px doesn't end up looking quite as sharp as uploading it slightly bigger so that it scales down. Am I just exporting them using the wrong settings (this would be in Photoshop, not InDesign)? 

 

Sorry - it's a difficult question to explain! 

D Fosse
Community Expert
Community Expert
October 9, 2020

"uploading it at 500px doesn't end up looking quite as sharp as uploading it slightly bigger so that it scales down."

 

The main point of preparing at final pixel size, is that you can then optimize final output sharpening. You should always do that.

 

Any scaling, anywhere, will soften the image. As long as you scale down you can compensate by a little resharpening, but don't do any scaling after that.

October 9, 2020

Moving to the Photoshop forum from Using the Community

lubalbs
lubalbsAuthor
Known Participant
October 9, 2020

This is also applicable equally to InDesign though. 

October 9, 2020

Do you want me to move the thread to the Indesign forum, you posted a link to a Photoshop Essentials article so I assumed you were referring to Photoshop.