Photoshop changing embedded profile from adobe 1998 to adobe 1998 (8bpc) which turns red to green?
- October 31, 2023
- 11 Antworten
- 919 Ansichten
I have a somewhat frustrating issue in my photoshop and hoping someone can assit and point me in the right direction? When I export a tiff file from capture one, with icc profile set to adobe (1998) and open it in adobe; the icc profile changes to adobe (1998) (8bpc) which turns my reds into a green hue? I have never heard of this profile and no matter what I try, adobe keeps 're-setting to this profile? What am I missing in my colour management settings? I have not changed anything except that i am now working on adobe 2024 (release 25), capture one 23 (build 16.2.5.9), wacom intuous pro and an M2 macbook which is running on ventura 13.6 . In the screen shots you can see my destination and source files are both adobe 1998. I have also included my colour settings (all seems normal?). Attached is also a side by side of the colour difference between capture one and adobe? When I opened the same psd file in adobe again - it converted the profile to the green tinted image and stripped the reds, eventhough i have embedded the adobe 1998 profile into the file? Please see the screen recording - you can see the colour profile at the bottom remains the same? I must be missing something but just do not know what? Or si this a bug that has crept inn somewhere? Another strange thing that happens is that my file sometimes turns grey while working in photoshop? All the layers are still there and active and I can see the thumbnail and all colour layers etc, but it jumps to that every now and again? When I click the layers panel in the gray area, everything appears again and I can see the image.(see attached screen shot)
I have reset my preferences already in the hopes that this would solve the issue, but it did not work. Would appreciate some feedback as this is mighty frustrating and is disrupting my workflow and making me worry that my end files will not show the correct colour as intended? Please help?...
