Skip to main content
Participating Frequently
November 5, 2008
Question

Photoshop CS4 is a disaster

  • November 5, 2008
  • 770 replies
  • 57062 views
I'm am just at a loss of words.

What a mess. It could not be any slower. What were you thinking Adobe?

You ripped apart the code just to add GPU support for what? To provide worse performance?

Make sure you DL the demo first... CS4 is a disaster.

The latest hardware cant even run it smoothly... Dont tell me its graphic drivers.
    This topic has been closed for replies.

    770 replies

    November 27, 2008
    >31 days is too late...

    Don't I know it. At this point, my only hope of being able to actually use the features that I bought this upgrade for is that Adobe (and/or the video drivers that it depends on) will sort this sh!t out.
    November 27, 2008
    if you're going to return it. adobe has a 30 day return policy. 31 days is too late...
    Participating Frequently
    November 27, 2008
    J Maloney:
    >On the constructive side, I'd recommend waiting 31 days before returning your purchase.

    Kool.

    Why?

    Must be some helpful reason you have to share with us . . .
    Participating Frequently
    November 26, 2008
    On the constructive side, I'd recommend waiting 31 days before returning your purchase.
    November 26, 2008
    Its a public forum James.
    Participating Frequently
    November 26, 2008
    >Kwan: Think I'll try it again later under conditions which do tend to slow things down for me quite a bit at times. With the following applications launched simultaneously: Photoshop, Bridge, Indesign, Word 2003 and at least one MSIE browser window.

    Emil;

    With (graphics or text or graphics and text) files loaded into each launched application, no difference from what I reported to you a few messages earlier.

    This is of rather intense interest to me because next week I'll be installing CS4 Master Collection on a new Vista (32 bit) system.

    Thanks much for posting.
    K
    Participating Frequently
    November 26, 2008
    emil,

    I tried your test using the largest brush possible and smaller sizes. I saw no problems. I even doubled the size of the file and painted with six different colors, one over the other.

    I often work with files that are a couple hundred megs. Occasionally the files are over 500 megs with 30 or more layers. I use a lot of filters and effects. Previously, this was on a Windows machine with 2 gigs of ram and CS1. It was slow, at times, but workable. Now with Vista 64 and PsCS4 I seldom need to wait long for any operation. Actually, saving a really large file is usually the longest wait I have to endure.

    Again, I'm NOT bragging as I didn't build this machine. Just trying to give you some hope.

    Q
    November 26, 2008
    emil: I only see a lag doing what you asked if I whip my cursor back & forth very quickly. If I just move it back and forth at a reasonable rate there is no lag whatsoever doing the whole page.
    Participating Frequently
    November 26, 2008
    emil emil;

    To my surprise, my XPS 400, Windows Pro SP3, GeForce 7900GS 256 passed your test. From start to finish, the paint followed the brush by about 1 to 2 seconds but never slowed nor lagged.

    Part of my surprise arises because there is always a mountain of junk running in the background. This particular system is rather . . . cluttered. And, this proprietary Dell/Nvidia 7900GS wasn't exactly designed for this sort of thing.

    Think I'll try it again later under conditions which do tend to slow things down for me quite a bit at times. With the following applications launched simultaneously: Photoshop, Bridge, Indesign, Word 2003 and at least one MSIE browser window.

    OpenGL settings turned on: Vertical Sync; 3D Interaction Acceleration; and Advanced Drawing. Cache set at 8.

    Best
    K.
    Participating Frequently
    November 26, 2008
    Buko, if you dont have anything constructive to add, please dont say anything. People are trying to deal with real issues, your immature remarks are uncalled for.