Replicating 1960s magazine print look

Cross-posting to my own thread from another one, since I know someone else will have the same question and come across this thread eventually.  This approach worked fantastically for a project.

I found a few risograph templates that gave a somewhat convincing effect - this one in particular came in handy, with some modifications. I disabled any halftone effects and used a film grain effect.  The trick is to deepen the shadows and overall contrast and then bring up the value of the shadows; then add film grain over a very subtle gaussian blur, and push the oranges / reds, especially in skin tones.   

I quickly mocked up this scene in Blender from the Lytegem ad above that I found in a compendium of 60's ads:

and then processed it with these filters:

 to get this:

The "filter gallery" filters (going upward) on the lower layer are Dry Brush and Cutout, respectively.  The camera raw filter is where a lot of the color grading and noise happens.  The top layer is an overlay layer at around 35% opacity, with a film grain and about 1px blur applied. 

I understand that in some circles it's downright heresy to call this effect attractive, let alone pursue it, but if you find yourself in a situation where you actually need to recreate the effect, some of these risograph templates come pretty close. 

Could you please provide one of the images you want to edit thusly? 

I just recently looked through some "prestige" coffe-table books from the 80s and early 90s, and all I could focus on was the appalling quality of the photos. I had simply forgotten. Back then we simply assumed that was how it should be.

Everything was off. Color reproduction, contrast, detail and sharpness. You'd never get away with it today. Equipment and procedures are so much better today.

I was being kind in my example above. In reality it would probably have looked worse.

Many years ago, I recall, there was an elaborate hoax where someone simulated a magazine review of a non-existent music keyboard, which many took as real. One thing they did was to put faint, blurred, reversed left to right text in the image, to look like printing on the other side bleeding through.

Grain/noise is OK, however I strongly disagree with adding any type of halftime screen to the file when the final output is a halftime print. This is why I originally asked what the output method was.

The grain in the 50s and 60s was due to rather low res printing dots.

So I would recommend to add noise. You can do it with a noise filter or even in Camera Raw. You can also blur a little.

Ilf you have a high res image you can also test Halftone screen filter but the minimal dot size is 4 pixels.

Fast and unperfect example combining several rechniques

from this

To this

Hope it helps

First reduce the dynamic range to the typical 5-stop dynamic range of a color transparency.

Then blur it a bit to reflect the poorer overall resolution of older photographic equipment and film.

Add a color cast to the shadows, and exaggerate cyans and reds. (orange skin tones, anyone?)

I wonder if working in CMYK would help.

What is the final output?

Device/monitor?

Print? What output method?

I would start with these vintage Color Lookup Tables to apply the tone of the image:

https://exchange.adobe.com/apps/cc/100359/100-vintage-retro-luts

Then apply some grain using a filter to add noise.

Ignore the masking below - its just to show before/after results.