Skip to main content
Participating Frequently
Nov 25, 2024 2:43 PM UTC
Question

The generative fill is almost useless now after 2025 update.

I never encountered this issue as bad until updating to the 2025 version. I have been trying to edit wedding clients, ELDERY CLIENTS, peoples selfies. GenFill Community guidelines instantly deny any single photo involving a woman. All of these would have been do-able prior to the upgrade. It could be her face; none of my shoots have been anything remotely NSFW. Yet every single photo gets declined, even removing an eye bag. It's ridiculous, as the 2024 version never gave me this issue. It's now making my job twice as hard and it is impossible to edit 90% of my clients now. I feel like I'm paying for a service that downgraded its quality and instead of being a tool that helps me is now costing me more time and money?



15 replies

Participant
Aug 8, 2026 11:23 AM UTC

I can definitely understand the frustration, especially when Generative Fill was previously reliable for routine portrait retouching. The fact that even harmless edits like reducing eye bags are being blocked makes it difficult to separate legitimate retouching from genuinely restricted content. It might be worth testing the same images with different selections or prompts, but if the behavior is consistently tied to the subject rather than the edit, that sounds more like an overly aggressive moderation change than a problem with the workflow itself. Hopefully Adobe can clarify what changed in the 2025 update and provide a better way for professional photographers to complete normal client edits without repeated false positives.
 

Translate
Participant
Jul 11, 2026 5:32 AM UTC

O que vocês fizeram com a IA generativa? Completamente absurdo, precisei cancelar a assinatura porque não consigo trabalhar mais com a ferramenta e migrei pra outro app. Completamente horrível, geração ficou agressiva, forçada, artificial e não combina com a imagem. É difícil de acreditar como uma ferramenta tão absurda conseguiu se transformar nisso 😧 parabéns por destruírem algo que estava perfeito e dificultar totalmente a vida dos fotógrafos 

Translate
Srishti Bali
Community Manager
Community Manager
Aug 7, 2026 1:12 PM UTC

Hi ​@Exquisite_Breeze5E48 

 

Apologies for the delayed response. I’m hopeful that the issue has been resolved by now.

I’m sorry to hear about your experience with Generative AI and that the recent changes have disrupted your workflow to the point where you decided to move to another application.

We understand your frustration. If you’re willing to share a little more detail, could you let us know which Generative AI feature you were using (for example, Generative Fill or Generative Expand), along with the Photoshop version where you noticed this change? If possible, sharing an example of the original image and the generated result would also help us better understand the behavior you’re experiencing.

Additionally, we recently released Photoshop 27.9.1. Please update to the latest version and let us know how it goes.

Translate
Thanks, Srishti Bali | Community & Engagement Strategist, Digital Imaging | Adobe
baadtaste
Participating Frequently
Jul 21, 2025 11:11 AM UTC

I have tried several times expanding backgrounds on pictures containing people and the AI insists on putting more people in. Not only not what I wanted - but introducing total strangers in group photos? Laughable.

Translate
Lukas Engqvist
Community Expert
Community Expert
May 20, 2025 3:34 PM UTC

Sorry I missread the thread… first thought it was this frustration covered in this video.  But it seems it may be a different issue. 
https://youtu.be/kpVADd-u2vU?si=o33BvX8bEjA5gsAf

 

Translate
Imaginerie
Community Expert
Community Expert
May 20, 2025 8:54 AM UTC

I has happened to me in the past: The same image gets a warning and the next day, the same action will get nothing.

Take it as only my experience, not an official advice: Try to log off and log in again after a while.

Adobe is an American company, they take that kind of things seriously, based on whatever their legal team has advised.
It's probably more reflective of the society around than personal preferences from the dev team.

Translate
Alexandre Becquet
Community Expert
Community Expert
May 20, 2025 12:16 AM UTC

Hello, can you reshare your example i'll try to find a solution.

Thank you

Translate
Participating Frequently
May 19, 2025 5:49 PM UTC

As i'm STILL dealing with this issue, I'm just gonna go ahead and say Adobe needs to fire whoever decided the restrictions and guidelines. Literally, a clothed image of a woman no good, a woman smiling in the background no good, even if her body is barely in the picture no good. Never happens to pictures of men. Hypersexualizing anything to do with women is a joke at this point, 90% of my clients are women and I can barely work on their images anymore because of the degenerate who decided anything involving women, who use photoshop more than most men i'm sure, is bad. What a joke. Typical adobe adding "smart" features that are anything but rofl

Translate
dawid.w
Participant
Dec 25, 2024 9:37 PM UTC

I guess that's because the devs at Adobe are themselves more dirty-minded than the normal PS user and therefore programming their filters to GenFill's death.

 

I tried to remove a hand holding a banana - yes, maybe a suggestive, but harmless situation - of a child sitting on a couch. OF COURSE, completely dressed, smiling and so on. While I was able to remove individual parts of the banana (had to, as the whole thing was a no-no ofc), I was not able to remove the childs hand - even after the banana was gone.

 

I guess it's time to move on and hope for competitors and some plugin-ins for their software. Would make more sense to use some Stable Diffusion stuff or other models as Generative Fill alternatives.

 

If Adobe would at least react to our feedback... But currently my feedback mirrors my frustration over their bs filters.

Translate
Community Manager
Jan 3, 2025 4:54 PM UTC

Hey @dawid.w!

I'm really sorry about the frustration you're experiencing. As you know, the technology behind Generative Fill isn't perfect yet, but it's constantly improving. We always aim to balance user freedom with our guidelines and the rights of others.

Sometimes, if there's any visible skin on the body, the AI might play it safe and assume it's adult content.

If you think this is a mistake, please hit the "Provide Feedback" button whenever you encounter an issue with Generative AI, so we can make this tool better. You can also share your feedback in this thread.

In the meantime, you could try creating a mask to hide the layer that shows skin and do your edits on a different layer. I know it's not ideal, but it should help.

Thanks a bunch!

Alek

Translate
*(If you mention me with an @, like @Aleke, I’ll get a notification and can respond faster.)*
Participant
Dec 6, 2024 10:16 PM UTC

Came here because I'm dealing with the exact same issue only now they decided to put gen fill on the Removal tool so I will literally highlight something it will just put it right back. The generative fill is absolutely useless I could get away with taking part of an eyelash now I can select 2 pixels and it will still give me an error, what's worse is it creates a layer for the generative fill everytime so if I forget to ctrl z I'll end up stacking like 3 or 4 layers of generative fills that failed, lord help me jesus

Translate
Community Manager
Dec 18, 2024 8:02 PM UTC

Hi @Sea31716716blcw,

Sorry for the trouble you're having. Could you share your System Info? You can find it by going to Help > System Info. Just copy the text into a file and attach it here in your response.

Also, could you share a screenshot or a video of the error you're experiencing?

Thanks a lot!

Alek

Translate
*(If you mention me with an @, like @Aleke, I’ll get a notification and can respond faster.)*
Participating Frequently
Nov 25, 2024 3:48 PM UTC

Downgraded back to 25.12 and it all works again. Definitely seems like it's a 26+ issue

Translate