Skip to main content
P
Palsgraph
Participant
February 5, 2025
Question

Severe deficiency in AI in analysis of criminal cases

  • February 5, 2025
  • 1 reply
  • 263 views

AI has proven useful as a Deputy Prosecutor; but the cases I can use it on are severely limited. I don't have time to be clever to get around this. As you might imagine peoples lives and property are at stake. But in the most serious cases I am denied AI support.

 

Your product Adobe Pro is worth every penny I spend on it. However the AI is a great disappointment. Primarily because it is so good and I am disappointed that I can't use it where it would be of value to me personally and society in general. Thank you for your time. Clint Mathis, Dpty. Prosecutor 8N Arkansas.

1 reply

try67
Community Expert
try67Community Expert
Community Expert
February 5, 2025

Not that we can do anything about it, but what is this "severe deficiency" you're referring to, exactly? How does it manifest itself?

Also, I won't be too happy to know that a prosecutor is relying on AI to process my court case. It's too prone to errors and "hallucinations".

    P
    PalsgraphAuthor
    Participant
    February 6, 2025

    I would never rely on AI to totally do anything. Additionally I represent the State and organizing information in different ways promotes the process, but I appreciate your critique. I think I will rely on my thirty years of litigation experience and make that call myself. The severe deficiency is that the facts of some cases violate it's morale code. Well, we get a lot of that don't you know. So the "severe deficiency" is really that I can't extract information if it deals with violence etc. And that makes it useless in about a third of my cases. Savvy?

      Terms & ConditionsAccessibility statement
      Using the community Terms of use Privacy Cookie preferences Do not sell or share my personal information ad choicesAdChoices