Would you consider an Adobe branded workstation?

I might think about getting a system made by Adobe. I am not a Windows fan at all. My field is design and web so for this reason I have both platforms. I work on and teach from both everyday. I favor Mac over PC. This being said, I have seen a decline in quality with the Mac, but none as big as the issues with Windows. Since I use Adobe products the most, I would love for them to build a machine that would work well with its products. I would definitely support that.

Lordy no! The most important thing for a production workstation is support. If I have a hardware failure I want a rep out the next day to get it sorted. The cost of being without a running machine is far greater than any premiums on the purchase cost. You can certainly build yourself if you're on a budget and know what you're doing, but if you're a designer/producer I think it makes sense to get a pre-configured workstation from someone like Dell or HP with an on-site warranty. These things can cost a bomb up-front but the hardware combinations are all tested to work together and they put a lot of effort into continued support. It's certainly not flawless, you still get driver updates screwing things up, but they're usually on the case pretty quickly to get such things fixed, and since they have a lot of similar machines in the field you benefit from the standardisation and feedback from other users, often big studios. Adobe is not a company that demonstrates any consideration or support for its users, I'd avoid them like the plague. You'd probably have to rent the thing anyway.....

https://forums.adobe.com/people/T+Cox  wrote Would you champion such a product?

no I would not... the fact is Adobe is not great at design for Windows systems but they are getting better so perhaps in a few years.

I have created somewhat of a hybrid by putting a really nice Adobe-branded 'skin' on my Macbook Pro. It looks pretty stylish and reinforces the Adobe brand rather than Apple's.

I found it at MAX a couple years ago and it's still looking good. I realize this isn't exactly what you had in mind, but there are some nice Adobe swag items that could soup up the look of your hardware.

Buck

I doubt that Adobe would develop or brand a workstation. They don't even write their own forum software.

There's all the expertise you'd need on the Adobe Premiere Pro Hardware forum, with regular posters from VideoGuys and ADK. 

Hardware Forum

Videoguys even have articles and guides on DIY systems

DIY Recipes and System Recommendations for Video Editing Videoguys Blog

But ADK also has a wealth of information, and you can always ask on the Premiere Pro forum

ADK Video Editing | Professional Video NLE Workstations, Pro Video Gear, Pro Video software, Computer Music Software, Co…

Then there is Puget Systems with heaps of excellent articles and real world tests, as well as ready made systems.  I love their tests along the lines of will Photoshop keep using all the core/threads you throw at it.  In fact they have just posted a Mac Pro vs PC performance article which I will be reading with interest right after I post this

https://www.pugetsystems.com/

Lastly there is Harm and Bill's PPBM site, but Harm does not keep it as up to date as the commercial sites.  It is still an outstanding source of information though.

Choosing components

While the above information if focused on apps like Premiere Pro and After Effects, they are still relevant to Photoshop and the other Adobe apps.  You can be reasonably sure that hardware up to scrubbing several 4K tracks with effects in real time, will handle Photoshop.

These are also exciting times with uber fast M.2 drives capable of 3.5Gb/s and at decent capacities and very reasonable costs.  CPU development has slowed down in recent years, but it is still worth upgrading to get lots of fast RAM, the above mentioned drives, and outrageous GPU performance.  Chris Cox (who we all miss since he left Adobe) once told us on the Photoshop forum, that memory and mainboard bus speed was the bottleneck at that time.  My box is five years old now, and built with help from Harm, Bill, Eric and the guys on the PremPro Hardware forum.  I was proud as can be that it held 4th place on the PPBM5 results table for a good while, and it still sits at 17th place out of the 1300 systems on that table.  Of course that table has not been updated for a few years now, but it is a useful guide on what works, and the difference GPU assistance makes.   It's notable that the highest placed Mac system in that table is way down at 661st out of the 1351 entries.  I am afraid I have no idea of how that might look today, but I assume (hope) the Puget System article I linked to above is going to answer that.

(Click to expand)

I will be replacing my system some time this year, and while I have not decided on the full spec to date, it will have 64Gb of the fastest RAM I can find, and either six or eight cores with priority going on speed.  It will certainly need to run better than 4Ghz.  It will have at least one 1Tb M.2 drive, and maybe a second via whatever interface is needed.   I'll use the GTX970 out of this box for starters, to keep cost down (and put the original GTX570 back in before handing on to my wife).  Note: I was originally going to build my new system at the beginning of this year, but have had to delay, so the above specs will probably already be superseded.

So would I buy an Adobe branded hardware system?  Not a chance.  You need to make the most of the flexibility that the modular build design a PC gives you, to make the system that best suits your needs.

All great points.

My concern is that most persons wouldn’t have the technical savvy to build a workstation from parts. Personally, I would prefer an off-the-shelf product with some aesthetic appeal.

Ohanafilms is right about Apple’s new priorities. As I’ve noted before, Apple used to be a computer company that had a mobile phone. Now it’s a mobile products company that dabbles in desktop computers. The aspirations for its products have changed too. They used to demonstrate the sophisticated things that could be created with their products. Now they spotlight trivial indulgences like text messaging.

Professionals will always need desktop tools, with large screens, to work. This could be an opportunity for a PC maker, partnered with Adobe, to accommodate our niche.

There are so many excellent PC options out there that run Adobe's products really well that I don't think Adobe really needs to get into the market. That being said, I could see there being a market for Adobe-approved setups. That being said, you would need to have different setups certified for different things too. Somebody working in Photoshop and InDesign will have very different requirements from someone working in Premiere and After Effects.

I would MUCH rather build my own workstation, which is exactly what we did. After decades of Mac use and hatred of Windows we finally realized there was no longer a reason to remain loyal to Mac just because it felt more comfortable. Building our own custom Window machines for video production was a great decision. We now have workstations that are more powerful at literally half the cost of a Mac.

Apple has turned their back on the professional creative industry that kept them in business during all those lean years. They can make more money selling the same iPhone over and over to people who will line up around the corner no matter what, they no longer need pros. But that's fine because there are so many great alternatives available.

There really is no need to pay a premium for an Adobe branded computer. Thanks to the gaming industry you can easily build an amazing PC that works perfectly for video production and/or design.