Skip to main content
Claudio González
Legend
August 20, 2012
Question

Can anything be done about this?

  • August 20, 2012
  • 5 replies
  • 4530 views

I have noticed lately an alarming increase in the number of posts with signatures including much private information that has to be later removed. In my ignorance, I tend to associate this with the increasing numbre of people posting from their mobile phones.

Regardless of the causes for this, can something be done to automatically prevent this from happening? As I understand things, once such data has been posted in a public forum such as this, the damage is already done and cannot be corrected simply by deleting the data from the post.

Of course, I am perfectly aware that the responsibility for not posting sensitive personal data lies with the poster, not with this site.

    This topic has been closed for replies.

    5 replies

    Noel Carboni
    Legend
    August 23, 2012

    Claudio González wrote:


    As I understand things, once such data has been posted in a public forum such as this, the damage is already done and cannot be corrected simply by deleting the data from the post.

    Damage?  You talk as though allowing the world to see one's eMail address is akin to asking for trouble.

    What do people do with such personal information in your neck of the woods that's so awful?

    -Noel

    Phillip M  Jones
    Inspiring
    August 23, 2012

    I wonder if it sets up the forums to the scrutiney of Botts that look for email addresses.

    there are easy ways to write email address so botts ignore them one is write every part of the address as individual words with spaces.

    Jacob Bugge
    Community Expert
    Community Expert
    August 22, 2012

    I have never  even considered clicking the Report button when it was called Report Abuse. Looking now I can see that the word Abuse only comes up when the next window is opened.

    Still, it should be termed differently, not just Report Abuse, maybe Abuse or other issues.

    As it is, reporting Private Information is most likely interpreted as something malicious, like spam, rather than lack of caution.

    Legend
    August 22, 2012

    We have a category on the Report page for 'Private information' to deal with this type of thing. Rather than juggle about with indirect replies, just report the message and one of the moderation team will edit it ASAP.

    TerriStone
    Adobe Employee
    Adobe Employee
    August 22, 2012

    I didn't know that!

    Do people who are not moderators need to do anything special when they report the incorrectly visible private info?

    Jacob Bugge
    Community Expert
    Community Expert
    August 20, 2012

    Claudio, Terri,

    And the obvious damage control (or at least limitation) at the root, namely to make the poster aware of the issue without replying to the post in question and thereby making it impossible for anyone but moderators to change anything, is often impossible.

    Most unfortunate.

    This reminds me of a statement I saw some years ago about spam mails: the only way to avoid spam mails is to shoot everyone that replies to them.

    John Hawkinson
    Inspiring
    August 20, 2012

    Jacob:

    And the obvious damage control (or at least limitation) at the root, namely to make the poster aware of the issue without replying to the post in question and thereby making it impossible for anyone but moderators to change anything, is often impossible.

    Just a reminder, a post is only marked UNEDITABLE if that individual post has been replied to, not simply any reply in the thread.

    So, as long as the post in question is not the first post in the thread, there is an easy solution. Reply to the first post in the thread.

    For instance, if post #10 in a thread contains personal information, you can reply to post #1 in the thread. Your reply will become post #11, and post #10 can still be editted by its originator. This would not be the case if you replied to post #10, though. In both cases your post appears as #11.

    Claudio González
    Legend
    August 20, 2012

    I usually use the trick of responding to any previous post, not necessarily the first one. Which of course doesn't work if you are trying to warn the author of the first post...

    TerriStone
    Adobe Employee
    Adobe Employee
    August 20, 2012

    Nothing automatic, no.

    And your guess about the cause of this rise may be correct. Impossible to say.

    Claudio González
    Legend
    August 20, 2012

    Pity. And unfortunately, I cannot think of any non-automatic way that has any chance of being succressful. Anyone?