Skip to main content
Sandee Cohen
Legend
March 20, 2009
Question

Little things annoy me

  • March 20, 2009
  • 110 replies
  • 9540 views
b Points

I don't like is this concept of "points". I really don't like the competitive energy of those points. I've been to non-business forums where people award each other "karma." It's stupid and can be petty when someone has more karma than others.

I have no idea who gives points to others, but I don't like them.

I wouldn't mind a record of when joined or how many posts, but I think that belongs in a profile, not next to the responses.

b Answering posts

Who marks a message as answered? As mentioned before, the OP could state the post is answered, but others could find a problem.

Will there be a way for the Forum Moderator to amend an answered post as "With Note"?

b Sorting the messages

Will there be a way to sort according to the OP? If not, it seems a waste of a column.

I'm sure I will have other issues that I'll add later.
    This topic has been closed for replies.

    110 replies

    Known Participant
    March 25, 2009
    This is also why I was kind of chuffed about the tabbed "Documents" feature that you can see in Clearspace's own home forum.

    It would be a good way/place to gather and retain Q/A threads and tutorials that generate a lot of in-depth discussion and refinement. An expanded FAQ, if you will.

    But, useful stuff like that seems unworthy, while gee-gaws and page-space-waste rule the day.
    Known Participant
    March 25, 2009
    But that puts too much of the onus about making sure ALL answers marked "BING! THIS ONE'S DONE!!!" on the host.

    I hate to say this, but sometimes, the host isn't the best-qualified person to make that determination.
    March 25, 2009
    >The "best answer" is to ditch the best answer.

    right. or at the least give the hosts the ability to modify that field.
    March 25, 2009
    The problem I see with posts using "answered, or best answer" is that this is not how the posts currently work. The OP may have his question answered, but then another reader will have a similar issue, but not exactly the same, or the solution posted did not work for them because of their computer setup.

    So now you have 2, 3, or 4 answers for the same question as the forum morphs slightly. If only one answer can be the "best answer" how can that possibly work?

    What will happen is that you will get even more questions posted that are duplicates for the handful of regular responders to respond to. They will have to list the obvious "best answers" first and they wait to see "that did not work, read that already". This will lead to wasted time, responder burnout, and a loss of very knowledgeable people.

    The "best answer" is to ditch the best answer.
    March 25, 2009
    >That th e OP is the one judges what is right for his/her situation.

    again. if they go away and never come back and it works for them, great. but the next 100 people that go by "answered" are getting bad or incomplete info when better info is available. what's so hard to understand there?
    March 25, 2009
    >Never mind the elite are always going to be the elite <Sigh> <br /><br />did you even read my response to you? did it make any sense at all? seriously.
    PJonesCET
    Participating Frequently
    March 25, 2009
    No I am not dense. I just think if is going to me an answered feature, That th e OP is the one judges what is right for his/her situation.
    March 25, 2009
    > Never mind the elite are always going to be the elite <Sigh><br /><br />what the hell is elite in wanting to give the best answer?
    PJonesCET
    Participating Frequently
    March 25, 2009
    Never mind the elite are always going to be the elite <Sigh>
    ~graffiti
    Legend
    March 25, 2009
    >It only seems to be the long time users here whom are up in arms about this entire affair.

    Not all of us. I personally don't like the new layout as much as this one but I can deal with it (as long as they find the option for us to enter threads at the last viewed posts. if not, screw it).

    >c'mon pjones! you can't be that dense!

    Well...