Skip to main content
999graphicmacjd1
Participant
March 20, 2009
Question

>>>> Thanks Adobe! I LOVE this new forum software!

  • March 20, 2009
  • 23 replies
  • 2980 views
As someone who belongs to many, many forums over the years, I've gone through a lot of forum software changes. Generally, the vocal majority raise heck about it, but eventually things settle down and people go about their regular forum use with little effort.

These new forums are so much "easier on the eyes" than the mind-numbing sea of text we currently have. Some like the new colors, some hate it. Some like avatars & signatures, and some don't. But the reason you come here is for the information, and this new software WILL make it easier to find what you're looking for.

Macworld.com switched to this very same software last year. They had an obscenely large user base, all of which voiced their opinions repeatedly, to the point where many simply stopped visiting until the switchover was complete. In general, those that don't like change tend to voice their opinions the loudest. The vast majority though, tend to keep quiet and roll with changes. Today, Macworld's forums are running just fine, offer a plethora of new features, and are more active than they ever were previously.

I have no heavy interest in what Adobe does with these forums because I rarely visit the current ones - mostly because I find them absolutely unreadable. But I'm also betting I'll be using them a whole lot more once this switchover is complete. In fact, I KNOW I will.

Rather than complaining about change in general, colors, icons, avatars, signatures, bloated code, or whatever silly reason some are coming up with, time would be better spent simply helping to find bugs with what is there. Once the bugs are worked out, Adobe will most likely start looking at "fine-tuning" the look & feel.
    This topic has been closed for replies.

    23 replies

    March 22, 2009
    It's the Lost Functionality that IS the problem!

    The Development team have been so intent on adding frivolous bells and whistles that they have strangled the Functionality.

    This could probably be solved by producing a Plain Vanilla Skin and by cleaning up their overly-complex CSS.

    Look what Eric@MCA and Mark Boyd were able to do in just a couple of hours and the improvement in performance is amazing when you use their Scripts.
    March 22, 2009
    If you mean that some people are more concerned about function, and others more concerned about form, then I plead guilty to being first interested in functionality. Good function with good form would be nice of course. But if it looks great but doesn't address the functional requirement then there's a bigger problem, imho, than if it addresses the functional requirement but it's got visual design problems.

    Some people have already posted third party tweaks for elements of the appearance. Nobody has, or probably can, provide tweaks for the functionality.
    Sandee Cohen
    Legend
    March 21, 2009
    > What I have noticed is that there is a totally different set of aesthetic values being exhibited here

    Totally agreed!
    Cindy-
    Known Participant
    March 21, 2009
    > And also a clue as to why it has been a major mistake to shoe-horn all of the Forums into the new MM-slanted format.

    I predict that will become more apparent as time goes on.
    March 21, 2009
    What I have noticed is that there is a totally different set of aesthetic values being exhibited here between the Users of the Adobe Professional Graphic Arts applications (Photoshop, Illustrator and InDesign) and the people who are almost entirely geared to AV or to web site work and the use of the formerly Macromedia products (such as Dreamweaver).

    Interesting.

    And also a clue as to why it has been a major mistake to shoe-horn all of the Forums into the new MM-slanted format.
    Curt Wrigley
    Inspiring
    March 21, 2009
    I predict that all Tom's predictions will come true.
    Tom_Murray_1
    Inspiring
    March 21, 2009
    Predictions:
    The new forum will replace the old forum.
    Questions will be asked.
    Questions will be answered. If not by "regulars", then irregulars.
    It's a big world out there on the internets.
    Now using Affinity Photo
    Participating Frequently
    March 21, 2009
    Something, something, insect overlords...
    Curt Wrigley
    Inspiring
    March 21, 2009
    Ramon does not speak for all regulars.

    I think the layout and look of the new forums is light years better than the old. I believe most people who wander in to the current adobe forums think they have gone through a way back machine to 1990 or something. It resembles early bbs's.

    Regulars may be used to it, and they may be effecient for some, but they are hardly welcoming. This update is long overdue and I welcome it.
    Inspiring
    March 21, 2009
    I believe there was a move title which covers the OP in this thread; Ah, yes. It was called "Minority Report" :)