what's going on now?!!

That uncustomized look is more efficient than the versions we have seen with avatars and all.

It is like having to ask for a no coffee, no tea, no chocolate, no alcohol, no sugar, no protein, no colour, no smell, and no fizz, drink in order to to get plain water.

The uncustomized would look more like http://townhall-talk.edmunds.com/direct/view/.f12feb9

>Plain "unadorned" is heavily customized.>

If that is "Heavily Customized" just keep on doing it!

No slacking will be tolerated!

:)

That is the problem with setting an Industry Standard for excellence now we will accept nothing less from you.

Plain "unadorned" is heavily customized.

I am not asking for an "overly customized" interface just a plain unadorned, efficient, layout like we have now with no frilly space-wasting rubbish like: Avatars, self-serving "Community Expert" or Member's Status Labels, and Member's Profiles on the main page

Ann, John has said he doesn't want to get locked into overly customized software like this has turned out to be, so that he doesn't have the same problem with not being able to have it updated.

Since when has software dictated Page Design?

What they are proposing is using a lousy interface because they are too idle to adapt their canned software to suit their clients' requirements.

because the current software apparently can't handle the load ann. that's the line and they're sticking to it.

>Basically, from a design standpoint, keep it as efficient as the good ol' adobe forums

EXACTLY!!

Why mess with PERFECTION?

JC created the perfect format for the Adobe Forums: why are these obviously tasteless, untalented and immature yobs being allowed anywhere near it?