Skip to main content
KarlaBeattyArt
Participant
March 16, 2017
Answered

[Locked] Too expensive!

  • March 16, 2017
  • 14 replies
  • 47507 views

Adobe CC full version is way too expensive. How do people manage $600 year?

Correct answer Nancy OShea

I use Adobe products in my work. So the cost is offset by the work I am able to complete for clients.

14 replies

Participant
August 14, 2017

The plans need to be restructured..... Package a plan for web designers, web developers, artists etc...... You would be able to get the tools you need without having to pay for all the products.... I know I will be cancelling my subscription, can no longer afford it...

Nancy OShea
Community Expert
Community Expert
August 14, 2017

You can still get the tools you want à la carte but the 2 bundles offered (Full Plan or Photrography Plan) give users the biggest bang for their buck.

Nancy O'Shea— Product User & Community Expert
Participant
April 6, 2017

Adobe is losing it's customer base of loyal users who are now retired and on a limited income.

KarlaBeattyArt
Participant
April 7, 2017

That's me, exactly. I have used both photoshop and illustrator since the 1990s. I need to upgrade, but $600 a year seems painful.

Nancy OShea
Community Expert
Community Expert
April 8, 2017

Photoshop Elements 15 is the entry level version of Photoshop aimed at photographers, image editors and hobbyists. It contains most of the features of the professional version but with fewer and simpler options. The program allows users to create, edit, organize and share images.   You can purchase PS Elements 15 on Amazon for approx $70.

Amazon.com: Adobe Photoshop Elements 15: Software

For vector graphics editing, if you can't justify spending $30/mo for Illustrator CC, have a look at Inkscape. 

https://inkscape.org/en/

Nancy

Nancy O'Shea— Product User & Community Expert
John Waller
Community Expert
Community Expert
March 17, 2017

If you're a hobbyist, it depends on your priorities. People will always find money for what they want to do.

Some people spend $1,000+ a year on coffee. Many spend the same on their cell phone plan.

Nancy OShea
Community Expert
Nancy OSheaCommunity ExpertCorrect answer
Community Expert
March 16, 2017

I use Adobe products in my work. So the cost is offset by the work I am able to complete for clients.

Nancy O'Shea— Product User & Community Expert
Onvibe
Participating Frequently
April 24, 2019

Plenty of unhelpful comments here, if everyone could use their client based income to pay for this platform annually no one would be bringing up this issue.  I have been using Adobe Programs since 2007 and I completely understand the need to change from the culture from one-off purchase to subscription based sales but by having the price so high annually you cut of a big part of the market that don't have the luxury of already being in a full time design role or people have a desire to use the platforms but charity and other such project which is the issue I'm having right now. I'm stuck tossing up paying the annual fees or finding another alternative so I can work with charitable groups without having to charge them for my help.

Onvibe
Participating Frequently
April 27, 2019

Design12345  wrote

Firstly, I thought these forums were for Adobe users voice their concerns and to unite on points of contention such as issues with the programs or price in a way that Adobe staff could address a group rather and individual complaints but It appears to me I was wrong and the forums are for "Adobe Community Professionals" such as yourself to belittle peoples concerns. If you're not going to be helpful or at least slightly sympathetic, why respond at all?

These fora are mainly for resolving technical problems with the programs.

I made up the numbers and my findings are that the subscription model is more economical than the old for buy model. And it is a wrong ownership feeling that you have. I “own” a massive amount of software that I can’t use any more because it is not running on current computers.

Adobe all apps costs 720$ on a yearly basis, far away fron the 6000$ that the old equivalent did cost, just to find out that half a year after, Adobe upgraded the line and that you would need to shuffle out about half of your price for the update. More, if you were on an older version. It is simply not true that the for buy solution is more economical.

And if you arn’t doing permanent work with the products, you take a per month license and for the rest of the year, you save the subscription fee.

In addition it is not for other users to decide, what thread I answer and what not.

FYI: 1000$ was the price at the time of Photoshop alone. It was at the time the product I was looking for, but unfortunately that was to expensive for me at the time. And 20 years ago the 1000$ were even more expensive in relation with the costs for living.


Never said you couldn't answer on the forum, of course, go right ahead, I'm just asking why you feel the need to be so rude and belittling to legitimate users of Adobe products.

I have older Adobe Creative Suites including 5.5 and those are working just fine on my new mac running Mojave so what your saying is incorrect. My issue is that there are a few programs like After Effects that don't want to play nice with the newer macOS which is what lead me to these forums to see what people were saying about getting a better deal or other outright purchase options so I don't have to pay every year for something I don't use all year round, hence the beauty of a one-off purchase.