Is It a little program for playing or for creating professional images???

[Officinecreativedigitali]

It doesn't follow the descriptions or at least it limits itself, it doesn't respect the composition and the style.... that is, it's approximate... change something because for now it is only good at landscapes. a body as I say is done after 4 or 5 images and I am never satisfied with the result. Then you tell him to set it in the past and he makes the characters in modern clothes. Is It a little program for playing or for creating professional images??? I don't understand where you want it to go... but so many ai are above you and I, who love Adobe, feel bad about it

[Jill_C]

You can achieve useable images with some practice, but it's a matter of how much time you want to invest in learning how to use the product effectively. 

[Officinecreativedigitali]

my dear, I've been using firefly for more than two months, I've already produced more than 600 images in this month. of 600 px... well, I've done 60... I apply myself and I've used all the techniques and suggestions... even ways of working on other AI...He doesn't stick to historical settings...if you want more than two people in the scene there is just no power...he doesn't understand a man from a woman or he acts trans. I am convinced that it is negatively influenced by censorship, political correctness and gender issues... only the landscapes have the right level of quality but it is truly incompetent when it comes to people... I make the same prompt and feed it to copilot and I tell you copilot is the least suitable for these things. he understands immediately and gets to what I say so it's not my problem it's Adobe's problem and a serious one too... develop your faces better there isn't a good one. It's doesn't wear what you tell him...faces can't be seen if they aren't in the photograph up to 3 4 steps...make a match with your images and at most he picks up on your tone...really not intelligent, he's stupid...he doesn't understand.

[SkepticOne]

You are spot on in your analysis and asking a question I have come to ask myself. I also want Adobe to succeed with Firefly.

[SkepticOne]

I totally agree with you...behind the scenes someone is making decisions that have nothing to do with the creator's prompts. Faces and hands are terrible. I ask for 18th century clothing and get people dressed in Swiss costumes. I ask for a "white" person horse or cat and am total that that "word" is not acceptible. I wanted a drawing of St. George slaying the green dragon and it refused the term "slay"--ditto "kill", etc. This "wokeness" approach to simple AI prompts needs to stop if Firefly is to be truly useful

[SkepticOne]

[Officinecreativedigitali]

Thanks for the comment and for comforting me that I'm not the one who can't make it work. However this is a classic example of the problem. But for me the issue is really at the core and how Adobe is taking the AI concept forward. We must understand what Firefly really is and above all Sensei... they are tools, they are more deeply automatic apps, not sensitive personalities who do things, therefore they do not and must not have censorship or restrictions, the creativity and responsibility for the contents remains with the creator of the idea not of the machine. More interactive tools in order to understand historical contexts, genre aspirations and levels of modification, these are tools that help you manage the work and firefly has some of them but does not follow them completely, it does what it wants. She is free to make mistakes, I am blocked by censorship, it must be exactly the opposite. The Creative discriminates what he wants and what is good or bad, it has always been this way and it must remain this way. We say this example is Raphael's but the good Sanzio is already good if he created the sketch and a few brush strokes on some faces, but the idea, direction and will were Raffallo's and therefore the same thing must apply to the generative tools . Adobe needs to empower creativity, not limit it. What you are doing is like censoring art or at least a creative flow.
You betray Adobe's very mission.

[bruceq77536783]

Amen!