Skip to main content
Participant
August 26, 2022
Open for Voting

Nudity and other issues which appear to violate Adobe Generative AI Guidelines [merged thread]

  • August 26, 2022
  • 184 replies
  • 120367 views

Hello Adobe and its collective users

I am writing to you not only as a devoted user of Adobe’s suite of creative tools but also as a professional photographer whose work has been recognized and displayed in museum settings. My specialization in classic nudes has allowed me to explore the human form in a manner that celebrates beauty, form, and artistic expression. However, I have encountered a significant challenge with the AI restrictions placed on editing images that contain nudity, even when such images are created within a professional, artistic context.

 

As an artist whose work often involves nuanced and sensitive subjects, I understand and respect the complexities of creating ethical AI tools that serve a wide user base. However, the current limitations significantly impact my creative process and professional workflow, particularly when it comes to editing backgrounds for nude or semi-nude images. These restrictions not only prolong my work but also inhibit my artistic expression, compelling me to seek alternative solutions that may not offer the same level of quality and integration as Adobe’s products.

 

I propose the consideration of the following points, which I believe could benefit both Adobe and its professional users:

 

Artistic Integrity and Professional Use: Recognition of the professional and artistic context in which tools are used can help differentiate between content that is genuinely creative and that which the restrictions aim to prevent.

 

Ethical Use Policy: An ethical use policy that accommodates professional artists and photographers, possibly through a verification process, ensuring that our work is not unduly censored while maintaining legal and ethical standards.

 

Custom Solutions for Professionals: The development of specialized software versions that allow more flexibility for editing sensitive content, with appropriate safeguards to prevent misuse.

 

Feedback and Advisory Panel: Establishing a panel of professionals from the art and photography community to provide ongoing feedback and insights on how Adobe’s tools can better serve creative professionals.

 

Transparent Guidelines: The creation of clear, transparent guidelines that navigate the legal and ethical landscape, especially regarding sensitive content, to ensure users can understand and comply with Adobe’s policies.

 

I am fully committed to engaging in a constructive dialogue and am willing to be part of a solution that respects both the creative needs of artists and the ethical considerations of digital content. I believe that by working together, we can find a balanced approach that supports artistic expression while adhering to shared values and responsibilities.

 

Thank you for considering my perspective on this matter. I am hopeful for an opportunity to discuss this further and explore how we can make Adobe’s tools even more inclusive and accommodating for professional artists and photographers.    Steven Williams 

184 replies

Participant
November 15, 2025

Plain and simple... Let people have as much creative freedom as they need. I've been trying to get a storyboard for a film going and all i get is "can't load" or "prompt decline" there should be very limited guidelines. 

Participant
October 22, 2025

So mentioning the President of the United States goes against your guidelines??? Canceling my account you sick disgusting liberals - FREEDOM OF SPEECH 

J E L
Community Expert
Community Expert
October 22, 2025

Hi @Jeffrey245844446dw4, well, lol, I don't think it's as bad as all that (I hope not!). But, seriously, I've helped other users who got similar flags with Firefly, and, honestly, this isn't about politics or bias; it's a built-in safeguard in Firefly to prevent generating likenesses of real people, living or deceased public figures like presidents, celebrities, and so on. Adobe's AI is going to force those restrictions, and it's the same for any notable person, regardless of side. There are several other AI models that have minimal guardrails on creating realistic or satirical images of politicians you could try. But even if allowed, you should always avoid misleading or harmful uses. We are sorry to see you go!

Participant
October 22, 2025

So mentioning the President of the United States house is against your guidelines??? Canceling my account you sick disgusting liberals - FREEDOM OF SPEECH 

Impressive_Giggles16E5
Participating Frequently
September 24, 2025

Votre programme de génération d'image Firefly est nul. 

Kartika Rawat
Community Manager
Community Manager
September 24, 2025

Hi stéphanl14799681!

Sorry to hear that. Please share more info on what's happening. 

 

Let us know. Happy to investigate.

Thanks, 
^KR

 

moved to discussions

Participant
August 30, 2025
  1. Í

Participant
August 30, 2025

There are too many content restrictions.

daniellei4510
Community Expert
Community Expert
August 11, 2025

I don't like this particular result, but being less precise about your selection often solves the problem.

 

Adobe Community Expert | If you can't fix it, hide it; if you can't hide it, delete it.
Participating Frequently
August 11, 2025

They're protecting you from all harmful things, just like good, coddling, helicopter parents.

nicmart
Inspiring
August 11, 2025

The Women's Temperance Union wasn't as prudish as Adobe. Tech corporations are infantilizing America's arts and social commentary. The "work arounds" often suggested by users are akin to the methods of evanding censorship in the former Soviet Union. The contemporary parallel is the morality police in Iran.

Inspiring
August 11, 2025

It's the bare arms. It hates bare arms on women. If I have models wearing t-shirts it often won't remove things from the background like a smudge on a wall. If you want to use the AI tools you have to ask any women to cover all of their skin before you photograph them🤣

nicmart
Inspiring
August 11, 2025

Yesterday I was prohibited from changing these clothes to "ball gown" or "evening gown." Anything short of a Disney Princess offends the Adobe censors.