Skip to main content
oliewdj
Participating Frequently
June 19, 2013
Answered

Render out of AE CC no h.264 option render queue

  • June 19, 2013
  • 10 replies
  • 191942 views

In cs6 you could directly render out of AE to h.264 via render queue.

Now there is no option in the dropdown, only avi, jpg sequence. dpx  etc. is this intentional to have to use AME to render out?

thanks

Oli

This topic has been closed for replies.
Correct answer Mylenium

Yes, it is intentional.

what’s new and changed in the next version of After Effects

Mylenium

10 replies

Participant
July 24, 2018

What exactly is AME used when rendering out compressed files, I'm so confused as to how to compress files without H.264 and I cant find the AME anywhere either.

Participant
March 10, 2017

I'd like to chime in here too with a recent frustration.

My office has both CS6 and CC2017 installed on my machine for reasons I won't get into here. I do a lot of banner work that use MP4 video content. What irks me to no end is that I can export my comps (300x250, 23fps, 15 seconds, usually no audio) out of CS6 to its native h264 renderer and control the quality from a number of angles. In particular, a 0-100 slider for quality where I can dial in the file size, which is of extreme importance in the ad banner world. In a recent case, I was able to export to a 1.2mb file with a decent quality directly from AE CS 6, but if I export from CC2017 to AME, no amount of tweaking I try, including dialing the data rate to it's lowest possible target of .19mb, produces anything less than a 4.2mb file.

What REALLY REALLY frustrates me is that there is absolutely no trusting the Estimated File Size readout at the bottom of the screen, since at the above settings, it tells me the file should be 375k. If I choose to use CC2017, I have to first export out to a lossless file and then open it with a third party application, specifically Quicktime Pro (and on another machine for budgetary reasons) in order to get a good quality, low file size video for use in the banners.

I'd really appreciate an explanation for this.

Kevin-Monahan
Community Manager
Community Manager
March 11, 2017

Hi ckjedi,

Sorry for this frustrating behavior. If you would not mind, please report all quality issues here. That way, they will be directed to the product team. They have the tech to actually correct these errors.

Thanks,
Kevin

Kevin Monahan - Sr. Community and Engagement Strategist – Adobe Pro Video and Audio
Participant
March 11, 2017

I have reported the problem as requested. I still believe it belongs in this discussion however. At the very least it's a public declaration of what I'm experiencing and perhaps one others have experienced as well.

Participant
March 2, 2017

I'm calling BS on all these excuses from Adobe for removing h.264 encoding from AE.

My understanding is that the use of the h.264 encoder requires software publisher pay a royalty on every copy they sell. While Adobe has had the price of that royalty built into their own pricing model for years they've probably figured out that if they remove it from AE and other programs (Premiere, etc.) and force them all to go through one encoder than those royalties go strait on their profit margins.

Money is always the motive for this kind of corporate ignorance. I'm not impressed.

Kevin-Monahan
Community Manager
Community Manager
March 7, 2017

Wonderful theory, neverville.

As I understand it, the decision had to do with avoiding duplicating development on both the Render Queue and AME, nothing to do with paying out royalties.

Thanks,
Kevin

Kevin Monahan - Sr. Community and Engagement Strategist – Adobe Pro Video and Audio
Thermoval S.A.
Participant
September 13, 2016

ofc it is intentional this way you force more people to buy or pay for access to AME. before we could just use AE to handle it all and it was working perfectly fine, now Adobe is gutting the app to force it's users to pay more for more applications.

Tim Kurkoski
Adobe Employee
Adobe Employee
September 13, 2016

Adobe Media Encoder CC is included with After Effects CC. Regardless of whether you choose to subscribe to just After Effects or if you choose the all apps subscription, Adobe Media Encoder is available to you.

Alan_AEDScripts
Inspiring
January 4, 2016

Problems:

[I'm just about to move to CC from 5.5]

1.No clear history visible with dates etc and files rendered.

For example, seeing reduction in render times as you optimize a scene.

2.No easy CTRL +d to duplicate a render.

3.Having to use 2 apps to render different formats = more time

4.Any scripting shortcuts are null and void. I used to have an email mp4 auto add to a render

as a script. It also disrupts my workflow with background rendering with background renderer (Alvarez)

and scripting with Autodesk Backburner.

5.It's an annoyance as it forces me to use another app unecessarily. I

would have loved the buggy code until it was replaced on your roadmap.

6.All my templates have to be re-setup again to suit AME.

Thanks

Alan.

Dave_LaRonde
Inspiring
January 4, 2016

With that litany of perceived issues, I don't know if I'd move from 5.5 to CC if I were you.  Unless you have no other choice, that is.

Szalam
Community Expert
Community Expert
April 23, 2015

I would recommend avoiding the QuickTime container for H.264. Just use the H.264 format in Adobe Media Encoder (it creates an MP4); it even has presets for YouTube.

Participant
May 20, 2014

ok Thanks!

Participant
May 20, 2014

Ok... so no h264 in AE anymore.. but I am a cloud user and I don't see Adobe Media Encoder available for download and install. Do I not have the option to get this program through creative cloud?

Szalam
Community Expert
Community Expert
May 20, 2014

It should be already on your system if you have Premiere and After Effects.

Participant
February 24, 2014

As there was no direct answer and only people sending you to other links here it is:
just go to Edit -> Preferences -> output -> enable Show Deprecated Formats.

I hate to go trough AME too.. those who say after effects is not good to export h.264 are not worthy of even using AE in my opinion.. it always exported nice and faster than media encoder for me.

cheers

Szalam
Community Expert
Community Expert
February 24, 2014

RottingAlien wrote:

Those who say after effects is not good to export h.264 are not worthy of even using AE in my opinion.

Even though one of those people (Todd Kopriva) is an Adobe employee whose entire job is working on After Effects?

Participant
February 24, 2014

yep, even him

Mylenium
MyleniumCorrect answer
Legend
June 19, 2013
Paul Slemmer
Participating Frequently
June 19, 2013

Nearly half of the times I render H.264 from AE, I am doing it with render settings other than Best.  (eg. Half resolution, Motion Blur off)  From what I was told, we will have to wait a few more releases for those settings to be controlled from AME.  (Currently Source Settings only has control of Guide layers.)

What would you suggest to take the place of my workflow?

Participating Frequently
May 14, 2014

PeterLanister wrote:

Why Adobe has decided to put the codecs out of AE???

It´s kinda anoying to cue it on AME. I would like to do the rendering in AE and not have running another Program (AME)

The render wont get faster and the ram is melting down.

First of all, you can render h.264 out of AE - instructions for how to bring those codecs back are in the link already given in this thread.

Also already given in this thread is the answer to your question. AE is NOT a good choice for making h.264. This has been mentioned several times. You would save yourself time and frustration if you were to read the thread before posting in it.


Here's the reality. Adobe is removing the option to use those codecs in After Effects in the next update. So you can stop it with the "it's no big deal, just click the box" rubbish. It's ALWAYS been a big deal because when a company deprecates something, *It's going away*. They're just giving you warning first. And here comes the ax.

http://blogs.adobe.com/aftereffects/2014/04/new-changed-after-effects-cc-2014.html

And frankly, this condescending "you should be using AME anyway" attitude displayed by some people, especially some very regular posters here, is unhelpful and rude. The fact is, lots of people use the H.264 exporter for quick previews, where quality doesn't matter and speed does. These are paying customers that gain nothing but a headache from Adobe's moves here.