• Global community
    • Language:
      • Deutsch
      • English
      • Español
      • Français
      • Português
  • 日本語コミュニティ
    Dedicated community for Japanese speakers
  • 한국 커뮤니티
    Dedicated community for Korean speakers
Exit
0

Virtual Audio Cable (VAC) for MAC OSX

New Here ,
Sep 02, 2015 Sep 02, 2015

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

I havn't bought Audition yet but I am using the trial (will buy it once i figure out my problem). I want to do what the person in the youtube video ([TUTORIAL] How to Make any Microphone Sound better & More Professional with Adobe Audition) did. Due to the fact that I use a mac I am unable to find a Virtual Audio Cable that works like the one in the video. Please Help Me. (buying Audition once i figure my solution)

Thomas Elkovich

Views

30.5K

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines

correct answers 1 Correct answer

People's Champ , Sep 03, 2015 Sep 03, 2015

I think what the OP wants to do is use Audition, in effect, as an outboard processor while streaming audio live to the net rather than simply recording it.  Please tell me if I have this wrong, Thomase?

From what I can see, he's trying to route the input (with effects) to the web rather than just to a headphone output--at least that's what I think they're doing with Virtual Audio Cable in the video he links to.

This obviously isn't what most audio software is made for--even in live use, normally y

...

Votes

Translate

Translate
People's Champ ,
Sep 02, 2015 Sep 02, 2015

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

Well, there are a couple of programmes for Mac claiming to be equivalent to VAC:  Virtual Audio Cable Alternatives for Mac OS X - AlternativeTo.net  Not being a Mac user, I can't vouch for how well they work.

However, I have to ask...what exactly are you trying to do?

I ask because the only extra thing VAC does is let you record with all those effects already included on your mic.  The more common way of working is to simply record you mic in its raw form then apply all those effects when you Export your multitrack session after doing whatever editing you need to do.  This has the added advantage of letting you change settings as required  while you edit--if you record with the effects already on, you're stuck with things as they are and can't fix them later.

Being really pedantic here, I'd also hate to have to add all those effects to every voice I record.  If you chose your mic carefully to start with (and probably hang some soft fittings around where you're recording to deaden the acousting in your room, you shouldn't need most of those anyway.  For example, using noise reduction on every recording is a sign something is wrong with your system before it even gets into Audition.

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
New Here ,
Sep 02, 2015 Sep 02, 2015

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

Due to me being a streamer it is much better for me to have all those effects added whilst i am streaming. I have tried soundflower although once I try streaming with obs no sound goes through... any suggestions?

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Mentor ,
Sep 03, 2015 Sep 03, 2015

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

I don't know what a 'streamer' is but what Bob said still stands the best method is to add the appropriate fx after recording.  I know I would hate to 'stream' for a couple of hours only to find that the myriad of fx I had permanently recorded didn't actually sound any good in the cold light of day but each to their own.

I would suggest that the best way to make a microphone sound better is to get hold of a good quality microphone and preferably one which suits both the subject's voice and the subject matter and use it in a suitably treated room - anything else is just chasing your tale.

"I have tried soundflower although once I try streaming with obs no sound goes through" - hopefully Bob knows what that actually means and can throw some light on it for you.

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
People's Champ ,
Sep 03, 2015 Sep 03, 2015

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

I think what the OP wants to do is use Audition, in effect, as an outboard processor while streaming audio live to the net rather than simply recording it.  Please tell me if I have this wrong, Thomase?

From what I can see, he's trying to route the input (with effects) to the web rather than just to a headphone output--at least that's what I think they're doing with Virtual Audio Cable in the video he links to.

This obviously isn't what most audio software is made for--even in live use, normally you take an output of the computer to a PA system or whatever  rather than streaming it.

Soundflower is suggested as one of the Mac-compatible equivalents to VAC.  From what I can read on line, it sounds like it SHOULD be able to do the job.  However, if it's anything like VAC, the set up is a pain and takes a lot of fiddling to get things going where you want...so it might be worth playing some more.  Also, I did some Googling and came up with another app called "Sound Siphon" which specifically says it can be used for streaming.  It might be worth a try.  Sound Siphon Alternatives and Similar Software - AlternativeTo.net

However, I'd repeat that this isn't really what Audition is made for and, at $20 a month for a subscription, you could fairly quickly get the budget for a better mic...probably some kind of dynamic you can work close to.  At the economy end, I might suggest a Sennheiser e835 which is flattering on many voices.  A bit of soft stuff around the room and working in close for proximity effect and it might sound quite good.  Couple this with a cheap mixer like a Behringer Xenyx Q series and you'll get basic EQ and simple compression (with a USB out) and you'd probably get what you want in a package actually designed to work that way (and sorry Adobe if I talk you out of a sale!).

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
LEGEND ,
Sep 03, 2015 Sep 03, 2015

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

If I were to do live voice streaming then I would use a hardware mic processor like a DBX 286S to do all the adjustments necessary in real time.

dbx 286s | Sweetwater.com

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
New Here ,
Sep 03, 2015 Sep 03, 2015

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

LATEST

THANK YOU SO MUCH! Sound Siphon does the job extremely well

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines