Skip to main content
H
Hamza25291388dqei
Known Participant
July 23, 2022
Question

Syncing collections and keywords between Bridge and Lightroom Classic (and sometimes Lightroom CC)?

  • July 23, 2022
  • 2 replies
  • 2784 views

Sorry if this is the wrong forum!

 

I understand collections can be synced between Lightroom Classic and CC, yet unsure between Classic & Bridge.

 

Do keywords made in Bridge, show up in Lightroom Classic or CC? Can't seem to see where keywords can be seen in CC too.

 

What ai mainly want is the ability to share keywords and collectins between Lightroom Classic & Bridge  🙂

This topic has been closed for replies.

2 replies

L
Lumigraphics
Legend
July 25, 2022

Note that Bridge and Photoshop have some keyword handling bugs where using them along with Lightroom can cause problems or delete keywords. If you use them together, be sure to check your keywords to make sure everything stays correct.

H
Hamza25291388dqeiAuthor
Known Participant
July 26, 2022

OK, thanks for the headsup!

 

gary_sc
Community Expert
gary_scCommunity Expert
Community Expert
July 23, 2022

This forum is good enough. 

 

This is a very complicated question because it may seem like it should be all over the place, but isn't.

 

A collection made in LR Classic, if set to sync, will show up in LR Desktop, LR Mobile, and LR web.

 

A collection made in Bridge will show up in Bridge. This is because Bridge is nothing but a viewer. It has no syncing capabilities, no database built-in (and you cannot attach one), and much of what you do in Bridge will be placed in the metadata in the file(s) but no version of LR will read that data unless you import those files into LR whereupon the link to Bridge is severed (because Bridge doesn't sync to anything).

 

Or, to use a colloquialism, what happens in Bride, stays in Bridge, and what happens in LR will stay in parts of the LR family.

 

So, to your final question: Not only can you not share keywords and collections between LRC & Bridge, but you cannot even have labels that you use in Bridge show up properly in LRC.

 

To make matters even more ugly, if you take an image that you have imported into LRC and open that file up in Bridge and then Adobe Camera Raw after you make changes in it and later open that file up in LRC, you will get a warning saying that this file was altered outside of LRC, which version do you want to use?

 

Suffice it to say, do your LRC stuff inside LRC and your Bridge stuff inside Bridge. 

 

I know that's not what you wanted to hear, but sorry, that's the way it is.

H
Hamza25291388dqeiAuthor
Known Participant
July 23, 2022

Thank you for your comprehensive answer.

 

"A collection made in Bridge will show up in Bridge. This is because Bridge is nothing but a viewer. It has no syncing capabilities, no database built-in (and you cannot attach one), and much of what you do in Bridge will be placed in the metadata in the file(s) but no version of LR will read that data unless you import those files into LR whereupon the link to Bridge is severed (because Bridge doesn't sync to anything)." Let me clarify if to understand.

- Isn't there some sort of database/file thing for it to know collections, tags, labels, etc?

- Keywords made in Bridge will show in in Lightroom CC? How about collections?

- Keywords made in Bridge will not show in Lightroom Classic?

 

"To make matters even more ugly, if you take an image that you have imported into LRC and open that file up in Bridge and then Adobe Camera Raw after you make changes in it and later open that file up in LRC, you will get a warning saying that this file was altered outside of LRC, which version do you want to use?"

- What about opening up in Lightroom CC? Does Adobe Camera Raw properly behave?

 

Here I thought Bridge is meant to 'bridge' all the Adobe products together ...

H
Hamza25291388dqeiAuthor
Known Participant
July 24, 2022

Keywords placed in Bridge are saved to the file's metadata which can be read by LRC. In LRC if you turn on this setting in the catalog  preferences:

The keywords will show up in Bridge but if you add new keywords, you'd have to re-import into LRC because the Bridge action took place OUTSIDE of LRC's database. 

 

Simply, it's never a two-way street between LRC and Bridge. The same thing applies to LR CC.

 

Lastly, you are correct, Bridge is the bridge between all of Adobe applications back before there ever was a LR. In fact to this day, if you set your Color Settings (Edit menu) in Bridge, those settings will be set in PS, AI, and InDesign. It will not make a difference in any of the LR applications or video applications.

 

Let me explain which things I do in which applications; perhaps that will give you one idea of how they can be used:

 

I use Bridge whenever I create or receive images that I would never think of adding to my LRC catalog. For example, if I take a photo of something I want to get rid of on eBay, I'll take a number of photos and review them in Bridge. Then select the photo(s) I want, and process them. and try to sell my item.

 

But, any photo that I want as a keeper and be able to get back to and/or part of my "story" of that thing, place, or person that goes into my LRC catalog. Most of the time, these are taken with my SLR camera.

 

If I take a photo with my phone, I let that self arrive into LRDesktop, where I can decide if it's going to eBay, stay in the LR-verse, or I'll export it to my computer to import into LRC.

 

When you look at how the applications work, what their individual capabilities are, and what they are capable of, you'll see that what happens in LRC stays in LRC and what's done in Bridge stays in Bridge.

 

BTW, if you want a demonstration of this, open a folder of images in Bridge. Then close that folder, create a new folder and move half of the images into that new folder. Bridge will not care and look at either folder as if nothing happened.

 

In LRC, look at some images in a folder that you've imported. Now, in the Finder or Explorer, create a new folder, move some of those files into the new folder. Now go back into LRC, and try to look at those images. You'll see that the images that you moved all have an exclamation point (!) on the thumbnail and if you click on that, you'll see that because you moved those images outside of LRC's knowledge, it has no idea where the images are. (If you go back to the Finder/Explorer and move them back to where they came, LRC will be very happy.

 

I hope all that makes sense.

 

 

 


"The keywords will show up in Bridge but if you add new keywords, you'd have to re-import into LRC because the Bridge action took place OUTSIDE of LRC's database. "

I thought LrC prevents reimports by greying out images during an import session?

Is there another way to force a refresh of metadata?

 

"Simply, it's never a two-way street between LRC and Bridge. The same thing applies to LR CC."

I'm currently using Bridge to extract/select 'actual photos' from my phone backups. I group them with tags; then once done, the chose ones go into LrC catalogue (probably a new collection too) - I can then share to Lightroom Cloud (said collection) . I don't want every random shot in my LrC catalogue, hence the use of Bridge.

To clarify, can Lightroom CC see keywords (and changes) from Bridge?

 

My understanding is that keywords can always be passed between all three (LrC, LC, Bridge) because they're stored in the image metadata, but collections from any of the three cannot?

 

By the way, is Adobe Camera Raw work/settings shared between the three? Might start using that soon so curious.

 

Thanks for providing insight into your workflow and uses!

 

Terms & ConditionsAccessibility statement
Using the community Terms of use Privacy Cookie preferences Do not sell or share my personal information ad choicesAdChoices