very different? it's exactly the same chart apart from one raw of colours which are in a different sequence.
My bad for thinking the industry would be smart enough to STANDARDISE a basic calibration instrument like a 24 colour calibration chart.
RTFM? the manual says to use a 24 colour chart... which is what i bought, it does not specify a particular make over another.
SpyderChekr people certainly are very bad for not pointing out in any of their info that their chart has a different arrangement in one single raw of colours.
I will follow your advise as per your other message.
thanks
Regards
> very different?
DNG PE does not allow a user to supply a target definition - so you only can feed a target with patches following certain sequence/arragement of "colors" and certain pigment formulation... even assuming that SpyderCheckr 24 has pigments sufficiently closely matching CC24/Passport for "hoi polloi" level of profile creation the arrangement is not the same...
> My bad for thinking the industry would be smart enough to STANDARDISE a basic calibration instrument like a 24 colour calibration chart.
which industry you are talking about ? there is no industry for that... or may be http://www.basiccolor.de/ is the only one left and their Input AFAIK supports arbitrary target definitions - that what a proper software shall do.
> RTFM? the manual says to use a 24 colour chart...
http://wwwimages.adobe.com/content/dam/Adobe/en/products/photoshop/pdfs/cs6/DNGProfile_EditorDocumentation.pdf is very clear "24-patch ColorChecker Chart" ... ___ColorChecker___ is (tm) owned by some X-Rite subsidiary and before by GmB and before by Macbeth and it is always meant the particular arrangement of "colors" (pigments were subject to some changes)