Skip to main content
A
Anonymous
April 2, 2009
Question

CF8 Standard performance monitoring on Server 2008

  • April 2, 2009
  • 3 replies
  • 2041 views
Having trouble finding information on this as it is notoriously difficult to search for things specific to 2008, but such is the rough and tumble life of the bleeding edge.

I enabled the Performance Monitoring feature in the CF Admin hoping to see some useful metrics only to realize that the 'NT Performance Monitor' has been replaced by the 'Reliability and Performance Monitor' which does not show CF in its list of potential things to monitor. Since I'm running Standard/32bit on 2008/64bit I made sure to enable the Performance Counter DLL Host with no luck.

What I'm getting at with this effort is that I'm trying to track down why my CF server keeps crashing without any mention of difficulty in the logs. I initially had trouble with the server running out of threads, but increasing the available resources killed that. I suspect I've only hidden the problem but I need metrics, performance or otherwise, to see what's going on. Any help, directly or by reference, is greatly appreciated.

-Jonathan
    This topic has been closed for replies.

    3 replies

    Charlie Arehart
    Community Expert
    Charlie ArehartCommunity Expert
    Community Expert
    April 3, 2009
    Jonathan, about CFSTAT, just to be clear, it reports the same info as the Perfmon stats you were seeking. That's all I was trying to say, and that if they DO work, then the Perfmon stats should work.

    As for "java monitoring", well, don't confuse FusionReactor and SeeFusion with jvm memory monitoring tools. That's a whole different kettle of fish. These are indeed Java monitors, but that's not obvious to us as CFers using them. The point is simply that they make it crystal clear what requests are running, and help you drill into them to know why they may not be running well.

    I should have pointed to another introductory resource on using FR (as a CFer), at http://www.carehart.org/articles/#2008_6.

    As for the "enterprise monitor", do you mean the CF 8 Server monitor? . And as for it being expensive, do you mean that you have to buy Enterprise to get it? Or by "eating your young" do you maybe mean that it can be expensive in terms of resources? That's only if you turn on the memory tracking, in my experience.I'll add that I also have articles at my site that I've done as extensive introductions to the CF8 monitor.

    As for your heap size quesiton, I don't yet run 64 bit so someone else may need to chime in, but I suspect that if you're running CF in 32 mode you may be limited to the same 2gig memory space (and therefore a heap of about 1.3-1.5gb).

    But you ask if reducing the heap will make GC more aggressive. I think this sort of conjecture sometimes is fruitless. There are differences in JVMs (so what people say/know/read regarding 1.4 may not apply to 1.6), and what GC agorithm is used (and what the default is in different JVM versions), and so on. Really, you need to test things. You can observe GC processing by enabling GC logging.

    Still, I'd argue you may be heading down a wrong rabbit hole. What led you to jump from the problem you described to GC issues? I know many articles/blogs point to that as the first thing to investigate/tweak, but I don't agree. My approach (and recommendation to my clients) always is to get the right diagnostic info to tell you what's wrong, then go fix that.

    In my experience, it's hardly ever code. Instead, it's nearly always configuration, whether of CF, JRun, the JVM, the DB, the OS, the web server, the network, etc. And honestly, it's often very simple once you get the right diagnostics.

    So what about my last question, about what the runtime out log said before the last error? I have various things I might guess it could be, from experience, but again lets let your system tell us what's wrong.
    /Charlie (troubleshooter, carehart. org)
    A
    Anonymous
    April 8, 2009

    Running a 32 bit JRE with a 32 bit version of CF on a 64 bit OS is still going to keep you limited to 1.5 to 1.8GB of heap space, total.

    You'll have to upgrade to a full 64 bit environment (OS, JDK, CF) before you can crank the -XMX dial open.

    It is quite possible your application needs more memory than a 32 bit enviornment can give it.  We ran into that situation here.  It was pretty easy for us to upgrade to 64 bit and we've not looked back, giving each of our instnaces 4096MB of memory to play with.

    Having a smaller heap size will make the GC work harder.  Keep in mind that when a GC happens, your system stops.  Granted it is only for a few milliseconds.  But a full stop does happen.  You might want to explore -XX:SurvivorRatio and -XX:ParNewGC.

    As been mentioned before, FusionReactor can be of great diagnostic benifit (as opposed to a Java monitor).

    I would advise you not to up and change your java platform in the middle of a crisis.  It will just frustrate you because now you have to learn a new java server and the problems will still likely haunt you.  If you can't make CF stable under JRun, it is going to be even worse in something like WebSphere.  Plus, you'll have less support because something like WAS isn't used by everyone, every day.

    Charlie Arehart
    Community Expert
    Charlie ArehartCommunity Expert
    Community Expert
    April 2, 2009
    Jonathan, look at the error previous to that one. Often there's more than what that last error shows. No, you don't need to hop to another platform. I've never seen a problem that couldn't be resolved, as long as one follows the trail of diagnostic info. Let's hear what you see next.

    Also, did any of the other info above help, in terms of getting metrics?
    /Charlie (troubleshooter, carehart. org)
    A
    Anonymous
    April 2, 2009
    cfstat executes, but not with any useful information. I'll have to look at the java monitoring options from the page you linked to some time next week, but the root cause of this is probably the ancient code running on this server. There is no clear break point between the same repeating errors we always get and the sudden loss of thread space. It's frustrating that the enterprise monitor is so ridiculously expensive, creating an "eating your young" scenario, but such is the reality.

    In the mean time, I read somewhere else that reducing the heap size would cause the GC to be more aggressive. With 32bit CF running on top of 64bit Windows/Java, would this be effective?
    Charlie Arehart
    Community Expert
    Charlie ArehartCommunity Expert
    Community Expert
    April 2, 2009
    Jonathan, I don't run CF on Windows 2008 yet, so can't help there. (It is supported, if anyone wonders, per http://www.adobe.com/products/coldfusion/systemreqs/, so it should work.)

    I'd ask first: are you able to use CFSTAT (from the coldfusion8/bin directory)? That will give you the same metrics.If it doesn't work, then perfmon won't get them, either. Just to be clear, did you restart CF after enabling it? Don't recall if you should have to, but worth a shot.

    Until that's resolved, and as for getting to the bottom of your problems, there are also the JRun metrics that you can enable,which are mostly the same (and more). Just google to find more on that.

    You could also use tools like FusionReactor or SeeFusion, or still others (some are free, and the commercial ones have free trials). See my list at:

    ColdFusion Monitoring Tools
    http://www.cf411.com/#cfmon.

    Finally, as for finding answers, don't rely only on the "cf logs" (literally, those in coldfusion8/logs). Look in the coldfusion8/runtime/logs (or those using multiserver, look in jrun4/logs). Those often have far more useful info. You may also see log files in the coldfusion8/runtime/bin, if you're having crashes of the hotspot compiler. The Windows Event Viewer may also sometimes have useful clues.

    I discuss all of these and more in a presentation I did:

    CF911: Tools and Techniques for CF Server Troubleshooting
    http://www.carehart.org/presentations/#cf911

    Hope that helps, until someone helps with the specific 2k8 challenge you're having.
    /Charlie (troubleshooter, carehart. org)
    N
    Newsgroup_User
    Inspiring
    April 2, 2009
    jonathan.haglund wrote:

    > Since this did not fix it, is it likely another update, or perhaps a hop to
    > WebSphere, JBoss or the like might improve my situation?
    >

    Maybe, maybe not. I think you have to identify *why* your system is
    running out of threads. If it is some programming fault that his firing
    off thread after thread without cleaning up after itself, then no matter
    how much computer resources your throw at it, sooner or later this
    process is going to eat up all the available threads.

    If your application is an intensive application being used by lots of
    users and it just needs this many threads, then you may need more
    systems to share the work load.

    If something is hanging a process so that lots new request has to use a
    new thread because none of the old ones have been release, you are still
    going to run out of them no matter how many you have.

    In other words, there is no system that has unlimited resources. So if
    you are bumping against the limits, you need to identify why so an
    appropriate resolutions can be applied. Otherwise it is just guessing.

    You have identified what is bringing down the server, now you need to
    monitor it to find out why, the tools mentioned before can help one do this.


    Terms & ConditionsAccessibility statement
    Using the community Terms of use Privacy Cookie preferences Do not sell or share my personal information ad choicesAdChoices