logo in div & height of div disappear after 10sec?

[tim cross]

Is there a way to hide a div and logo within it?

I have a logo at the top of the screen, but after 10 seconds I want it to disappear, and the text below it move up to replace it.

I have found how to hide the logo, but I can't get the box to go to 0px and disappear!

anyway of doing this please?

[osgood_]

https://forums.adobe.com/people/Nancy+OShea  wrote

$(this).delay(10000).slideUp(1e3)

Whats 1e3 do? - never seen that used before.

[Nancy OShea]

  wrote

https://forums.adobe.com/people/Nancy+OShea   wrote

$(this).delay(10000).slideUp(1e3)

Whats 1e3 do? - never seen that used before.

1e3 = 1000 = 1 second

[osgood_]

Grief l cant say l find that hugely visual to understand but l guess it might be useful in cases where youre dealing with larger numbers.

[ALsp]

Would 10^3 be clearer 😉

[osgood_]

Im happy with 1000 or better still 1s or 10s or 1min who comes up with this stuff.

[Nancy OShea]

osgood_  wrote

...who comes up with this stuff.

The science guys.

[pziecina]

osgood_  wrote

Im happy with 1000 or better still 1s or 10s or 1min who comes up with this stuff.

Don't forget coders must make what they write look complicated to others .

[osgood_]

From what lve read its some form of crazy scientific notation, maybe l can add scientist to my cv as well

[ALsp]

Hi Tim,

You can use Bootstrap, jQuery, or both, but here is how I would do it (with pure CSS):

http://www.projectseven.com/csslab/logo-be-gone/

[ALsp]

And for any carpenters who might be lurking...

If the only tool you have is a hammer (or Bootstrap), you might tend to treat everything as if it were a nail.

[pziecina]

To the OP.

The posters of the answers marked as helpfull, are being marked as such by the poster themselves. So have no validity of actually being helpfull.

[Nancy OShea]

Helpful and Liked can be marked by anyone at any time today, tomorrow or 5 years from now.  There's nothing invalid about it.

[pziecina]

https://forums.adobe.com/people/Nancy+OShea  wrote

Helpful and Liked can be marked by anyone at any time today, tomorrow or 5 years from now.  There's nothing invalid about it.

Marking your own as helpfull, does give anyone reading the discussion now or in years to come, a completely false impression. As far as I am concerned the practice of marking something as 'helpfull' that someone posted themselves is unethical.

Like, that is for the individual to decide.

[osgood_]

Its a bit naff though to like or mark ones own posts as helpful - that should be up to someone else to decide. Thats just sooooooo wrong in my opinion.

[ALsp]

Okay. I definitely don't want to seem naff.

[Nancy OShea]

osgood_  wrote

Its a bit naff though to like or mark ones own posts as helpful - that should be up to someone else to decide. Thats just sooooooo wrong in my opinion.

Here we go again with off topic banter which is exactly why I have a Helpful on my answer.   These days, it's getting harder to separate wheat from chaff.

If I feel a reply is helpful, I mark it helpful.  It doesn't matter who wrote it.   This is a technical forum folks , not a popularity contest.

The only ACP who answers questions in the Portfolio forum is me.  There's no staff moderator either.   So if the OP goes away, I  must mark my own replies Correct and/or Helpful because there's nobody else aruond to do it.    And BTW I receive no points for self-awarding.   No harm and no foul.

[pziecina]

https://forums.adobe.com/people/Nancy+OShea  wrote

And BTW I receive no points for self-awarding.   No harm and no foul.

Wrong, I can remember you and others complaining when someone marked their own answer as helpful, (The Shocker comes to mind). There has also been a number of posts concerning the practice over the years, and I cannot remember one in which you defended the practice.

[Nancy OShea]

pziecina  wrote

https://forums.adobe.com/people/Nancy+OShea   wrote

And BTW I receive no points for self-awarding.   No harm and no foul.

Wrong, I can remember you and others complaining when someone marked their own answer as helpful, (The Shocker comes to mind). There has also been a number of posts concerning the practice over the years, and I cannot remember one in which you defended the practice.

Paula,  I have absolutely no problem with people marking legitimate answers as helpful.   What I object to are the self-aggrandizing twits who mark the worst possible answer as helpful (it's usually their own). 

[osgood_]

https://forums.adobe.com/people/Nancy+OShea  wrote

osgood_   wrote

Its a bit naff though to like or mark ones own posts as helpful - that should be up to someone else to decide. Thats just sooooooo wrong in my opinion.

Here we go again with off topic banter which is exactly why I have a Helpful on my answer.   These days, it's getting harder to separate wheat from chaff.

Anyone that posts here, regardless of their skill level, might as well mark their answers as helpful, that then becomes meaningless if we are all as arrogant. Only the OP knows if a post is helpful to them or not. I dont give a shite about anyone else who might find the thread in years to come - they can read throught it if they want to follow whats been said and make their own judgements as to what if anything is helpful to them.

I've marked a post that is practically useless as helpful - useless unless someone actually finds it helpful (someone might) but I can do it because its available, so why not lets all start marking our own posts as helpful because by replying we all think we are being helpful, even if we are not. Who gives you the right to judge if anything is helpful?

[BenPleysier]

osgood_  wrote

Anyone that posts here, regardless of their skill level, might as well mark their answers as helpful, that then becomes meaningless if we are all as arrogant. Only the OP knows if a post is helpful to them or not. I dont give a shite about anyone else who might find the thread in years to come - they can read throught it if they want to follow whats been said and make their own judgements as to what if anything is helpful to them.

I've marked a post that is practically useless as helpful - useless unless someone actually finds it helpful (someone might) but I can do it because its available, so why not lets all start marking our own posts as helpful because by replying we all think we are being helpful, even if we are not. Who gives you the right to judge if anything is helpful?

Typical.

This sort of comment begs for the topic to be locked.

[ALsp]

Obviously, I am not trying to hide that, Paula. The thread once again has gone off on tangents. In my humble opinion, I believe a pure CSS animation is the simplest means to an end here and the other potential solutions are overly complex. Again, my opinion, though you did originally propose a CSS solution - even if it was not yet fully developed.

[superc51632781]

you will have to make the background

of the div transparent so you can not see it.

create a transparent div.

[Nancy OShea]

superc51632781  wrote

you will have to make the background

of the div transparent so you can not see it.

create a transparent div.

The question is about making a division and its contents  disappear after a delay of 10 seconds.  The background color & transparency are irrelevant.

[ALsp]

Hi Super,

Correct solutions have been provided by several people using either JavaScript or CSS keyframes.