Skip to main content
Inspiring
February 3, 2019
Question

Parallax Help

  • February 3, 2019
  • 3 replies
  • 3390 views

Hello all;

I found this website showing mouse-over effect written in J Query.

jQuery Mouseover Effect with Parallax Style Tutorial - freshDesignweb

I don't know where to start, how do I design an image in a way that the scripts are able to move those parts in the image independently in different direction as you move the mouse within image boundary?

I also found another demo "see screen shot below", when you move the mouse over an image, the shoe will move closer toward me and the text on the left just moves around as you move the mouse inside the image.

Can you please explain.

Thanks.

This topic has been closed for replies.

3 replies

Inspiring
February 3, 2019

Thank you each one of you for your valuable input!! and thanks to Nancy OShea​​ for pointing out the the feature in Firefox.

I understand the effect would not work on tables and phones, which is fine as long as it would not render the website buggy.

Nancy OShea
Community Expert
February 3, 2019
Nancy O'Shea— Product User & Community Expert
Brainiac
February 3, 2019

Its very, very poor, doesn't do anything in mobile.

ALsp
Brainiac
February 3, 2019

Yeah. There are some serious problems with the approach and the script. A good case for how bad programmers can misuse jQuery.

BenPleysier
Community Expert
February 3, 2019
Wappler is the DMXzone-made Dreamweaver replacement and includes the best of their powerful extensions, as well as much more!
ALsp
Brainiac
February 3, 2019

I'm not sure where they came from, but there are quite a few errors on that page:

Showing results for https://pleysier.com.au/klarity/parallax.php - Nu Html Checker

Here is an alternative approach to complex animations:

BSE Animation Test

ALsp
Brainiac
February 4, 2019

ALsp  wrote

I'm not sure where they came from, but there are quite a few errors on that page:

Showing results for https://pleysier.com.au/klarity/parallax.php - Nu Html Checker

Yes, I can see how a gullible person could view this as a problem. More informed persons would have read

This tool is an ongoing experiment in better HTML checking, and its behavior remains subject to change

Very nice, Ben. You are obviously a gentleman and a scholar - and a remarkable coder, too. How many personal attacks do you get to make before someone from Adobe pulls their head out of the sand?

You are one nasty, despicable human being. We have many pages that don't validate for silly reasons, but when I present an example page to a customer I always make sure it validates. You say, DMX is forward thinking. That may be true, but it has nothing to do with your rudeness. We need to get options from our UIs into the markup, too. We chose to use data attributes and spend the time building more logic into our scripts and interfaces to handle that particular method. You are not in a position to make the claims you do, especially since I was not attacking you personally. What is your problem?