Exit
  • Global community
    • Language:
      • Deutsch
      • English
      • Español
      • Français
      • Português
  • 日本語コミュニティ
  • 한국 커뮤니티
0

How to get even distance using the Blend Tool

Engaged ,
Sep 01, 2023 Sep 01, 2023

Hi community. 

 

I'd like to know why the blend tool, when a shape is smaller from one end to another, the specified distance is not equal in Shape B, as opposed to shape A, where the rectangles are the same size from top to bottom. 

And what is the best method to have a larger shape which is smaller on the end, and have the in btween intervals evenly spaced.

 

Thank you.

 

StefanCargoski_0-1693564840631.png

 

 

TOPICS
How-to
616
Translate
Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines

correct answers 1 Correct answer

Community Expert , Sep 01, 2023 Sep 01, 2023

Stefan,

 

To obtain a harmonious relation between size and spacing, you might consider a much simpler way with an Effect based on the first (and smallest) instance instead, such as Effect>Distort&Transform>Transform with a suitable modest scaling and a corresponding Move, shown here with 110% scaling and a horizontal Move of twice the side length (of the unrotated square):

Click/RightClick to get closer, Click again to get closer still

 

 

 

 

Translate
Adobe
Community Expert ,
Sep 01, 2023 Sep 01, 2023

If it's vertical or horizontal, you can expand the blend and use the align panel.

If expanding the blend is not an option, then your only chance is to create handles for the blend spine and use that. I've covered the process in this video: https://youtu.be/GhgcNy4IvAI 

Translate
Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Engaged ,
Sep 06, 2023 Sep 06, 2023
LATEST

Thank you for this reply, this was another interesting method using the handles to adjust the spacing.

 

Translate
Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Community Expert ,
Sep 01, 2023 Sep 01, 2023

Stefan,

 

The distance is measured centre to centre, so with changing size the spacing will change (to negative even).

Translate
Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Community Expert ,
Sep 01, 2023 Sep 01, 2023

Stefan,

 

To obtain a harmonious relation between size and spacing, you might consider a much simpler way with an Effect based on the first (and smallest) instance instead, such as Effect>Distort&Transform>Transform with a suitable modest scaling and a corresponding Move, shown here with 110% scaling and a horizontal Move of twice the side length (of the unrotated square):

Click/RightClick to get closer, Click again to get closer still

 

 

 

 

Translate
Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Engaged ,
Sep 01, 2023 Sep 01, 2023

Always Helpful!

 

Kind regards!

 

 

Translate
Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Community Expert ,
Sep 01, 2023 Sep 01, 2023

Thank you for your kind words, Stefan, and for presenting another intriguing case.

Translate
Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines