• Global community
    • Language:
      • Deutsch
      • English
      • Español
      • Français
      • Português
  • 日本語コミュニティ
    Dedicated community for Japanese speakers
  • 한국 커뮤니티
    Dedicated community for Korean speakers
Exit
0

Why does a font have so many names...?

Contributor ,
Sep 23, 2022 Sep 23, 2022

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

Our team is moving from Type 1 Postscript fonts to Open Type fonts for hundreds of documents, and (long story short) we're trying to do some automation to create and maintain cross reference for everyone.

Problem:

  • With help from the Suitcase company (Extensis), I was able to use a sh script to get a list of the names of all our Type 1 fonts (over 5000). This list includes both the Postscript Name and the Name. Example:
       Swiss721BT-BoldCondensed  (Postscript name)
       Swis721 BdCn BT   (Font Name)
  • But now we've noticed that the font list appearing in Illustrator Find Font, and outputted using Adobe Illustrator > Package doesn't match either Postscript or Font name:
    Swiss 721 BT Bold Condensed

That pretty much shoots down the automation we were planning to use to develop the cross reference. I understand that there's a Name and a Postscript name embedded in a font. (And physical font names, which are also different and are not going to help.) So we thought we had things covered with the Suitcase list containing both names, but...

 

Two questions:

  1. What/where the heck is the font name Adobe provides coming from? What's it called?
  2. And is there any way of getting the same name output from both Adobe and our font manager? (Unfortuntely, team members have been already creating Package font lists for all these art files. Wish I'd caught this sooner.)

I've attached what we see in Suitcase--same names as in the sh script output.

Swis in Suitcase.png

Thank you for assistance (or maybe just sympathy..).

 

TOPICS
Type

Views

250

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines

correct answers 1 Correct answer

Community Expert , Sep 23, 2022 Sep 23, 2022

There are several layers happening here. There is the actual file name as it's stored on the computer (and this can actually vary), there's the internal Postscript name; which is what the printer refers to; and then there's the Family Name + Style name that most apps use to display the fonts. All are necessary for each specific task, and all these are inside a font file.

Most OpenType reboots of fonts have renamed these, especially the Postcript name, so that there's no confusion at the printer,

...

Votes

Translate

Translate
Adobe
Community Expert ,
Sep 23, 2022 Sep 23, 2022

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

There are several layers happening here. There is the actual file name as it's stored on the computer (and this can actually vary), there's the internal Postscript name; which is what the printer refers to; and then there's the Family Name + Style name that most apps use to display the fonts. All are necessary for each specific task, and all these are inside a font file.

Most OpenType reboots of fonts have renamed these, especially the Postcript name, so that there's no confusion at the printer, but there are those 3rd party vendors that simply convert the font format without any name changes.  In the end, the important one is the Postscript name. It's a mixed bag, sorry!

Screen Shot 2022-09-23 at 5.56.04 PM.png

 

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Contributor ,
Sep 26, 2022 Sep 26, 2022

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

That was very informative, thank you. It sounds like there's no way to get Adobe to show the same names that Suitcase does, or vice versa, so we'll have to go with a more manual identification system instead of automation. Not show stopper, just a little more PITA added to this already challenging project!  Appreciate your time and input. 

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Community Expert ,
Sep 26, 2022 Sep 26, 2022

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

Like I said, the important name is the Postscript name. InDesign shows it when you look at the font list if you have More Info checked. e.g. this is in the Find/Replace dialog:

Screen Shot 2022-09-26 at 10.48.20 AM.png

Illustrator, as you've noticed, doesn't list so much detail, as the Postscript name is really an internal thing and really doesn't need to be seen by the user, hence when you list fonts in an Illustrator document, it will only show what the user needs, which is Family name and Style Name.

ALL the info IS in the Illustrator document though, e.g. stored as xmp data. Perhaps you could look at a method to extract that:

Screen Shot 2022-09-26 at 11.02.40 AM.png

 (in this case the Postscript Name = Font Name)

 

 

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Contributor ,
Sep 26, 2022 Sep 26, 2022

Copy link to clipboard

Copied

LATEST

Thanks for the idea, Brad, it's worth a thought. As I noted, I didn't look closely enough when we originally started using Package to output names from Illustrator (InDesign is not a concern), and I made the erroneous assumption that if I could just get those two names out of Suitcase, we'd have a match. (Some do actually match.)

 

Unfortunately our team has already spent about a month opening many of our art documents and exporting font lists using Package...

 

Since we're up against the December 31 transition deadline, I'll have to decide whether the time spent trying to create a different extract via Raw Data (I haven't a clue how) is worth it--vs. a close-but-not-perfect cross reference. Not to mention the cringe factor of telling the team "nevermind" on what they've done so far...

Votes

Translate

Translate

Report

Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines