Exit
  • Global community
    • Language:
      • Deutsch
      • English
      • Español
      • Français
      • Português
  • 日本語コミュニティ
    Dedicated community for Japanese speakers
  • 한국 커뮤니티
    Dedicated community for Korean speakers
1

Covert jpeg to tiff

Community Beginner ,
Nov 23, 2019 Nov 23, 2019

Hi, 

 

I am making a magazine and I need to convert the images to print ready tiff files rather than using JPEG's. How do I do this 

3.4K
Translate
Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines

correct answers 1 Correct answer

Community Expert , Nov 23, 2019 Nov 23, 2019

Don't convert images from JPG to TIFF, you gain nothing. Keep them as JPG in RGB. If you need to convert them to CMYK, do it with the Export to PDF according to your printer’s requirement. Conversion to CMYK can be done in the PDF Export in the Output section.

Translate
Community Expert ,
Nov 26, 2019 Nov 26, 2019

Well, I have seen my fair share of these stitching lines in printed output.

Probably because the print operator is totally nuts or blindfolded, or they are using some ancient PostScript emulation, based on tapping into screen-routines. Especially large-format printers in CAD environments suffer a lot from these crippled low-cost renderers.

 

But back on-topic: what's the benefit of going from JPEG to TIFF ? Nada.

It will only fill-up your harddisk a lot quicker...

Translate
Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Community Expert ,
Nov 29, 2019 Nov 29, 2019
LATEST

or they are using some ancient PostScript emulation, based on tapping into screen-routines

 

I think it is worth noting that it is the device that is introducing the visible artifacts, and not the PDF/X-1a flattening. If the page is RIP’ed with anti-aliasing (i.e. typically any relatively low res display), the flattened, anti-aliased, tile boundaries become visible—that would not happen with a high res platemaker.

 

You can see the effect by "RIPing" a PDF/X-1a page into Photoshop with and without anti-aliasing checked. Here at 72ppi the difference is obvious:

 

Screen Shot 13.pngexpand image

 

Platemaker and imagsetter RIPs don't need anti-aliasing because they are high res and one wouldn't want gray pixels on the edge of something like black only text.

 

So the same PDF/X-1a opened at a typical platemaker res 2800 ppi with no anti-aliasing:

 

Screen Shot 14.pngexpand image

 

 

Translate
Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines
Community Expert ,
Nov 26, 2019 Nov 26, 2019

 

RGB is fine with a vendor using a quality color-managed workflow.

 

Even in that case the printer’s conversion could be wrong. The client could be running a bad monitor profile—the  accurate display of any RGB editing space depends on the system’s monitor profile generated by a proper calibaration.

 

The reason online short run printers want PDF/X-1a isn’t because they are old fasion, it’s because the automation can’t catch a problem color like 0|0|255 RGB blue, which is unprintable no matter what monitor, source, and destination profiles are used. And although it is unusual, live transparency can still fail depending on the effects used.

 

https://community.adobe.com/t5/indesign/color-and-blending-modes-between-placed-ai-file-and-indesign...

Translate
Report
Community guidelines
Be kind and respectful, give credit to the original source of content, and search for duplicates before posting. Learn more
community guidelines