Aligning text in a table cell to the baseline grid does not work for me:
Should it work?
Background: I have a few two-column tables that I just want to inline in the text. One of them is a schedule with dates on the left and items on the right. Nothing fancy.
1 Correct answer
In the end I got table cells and text aligned to the grid by selecting Relative To: Top Of Page. This is a hack, but with the grid relative to top margin, I just couldn’t get it to work.
Unfortunately, I cannot provide more details as my subscription has expired.
18
Replies
Hi feklee:
Did you create a paragraph style for the text within the table, and snap it to the baseline grid? You said you are using the same style as the text—are there overrides in play? Yes, this should work.
~Barb
Hi Jane:
I played with this for a bit. I moved my table inline, and it made no difference if I changed it to top margin or top of page. I couldn't break it. 
~Barb
With a brand new letter document it works (standard everything, except that I selected align to baseline grid😞
Once I change the grid size and make it start relative to the top margin, things go bad:
Is this a bug or am I missing something?
Sure, I'd be happy to. If I go into more detail, though, I need to explain other things. I see all sorts of correct, yet incomplete, observations about how tables pose certain vertical alignment problems, both regarding cell limits and text within cells itself. But none address what I believe is a core issue in InDesign.
If you are half serious about text design, you can't work without a grid. I'll call this a "page design grid". Now, the horizontal division of this grid is the column, and the vertical one, the row. The consequence is, if the baseline grid is to be of any real use, that the baseline grid height, from line to line, is a module (a sub-division) of your page design grid row height. And the corollary is that baseline grid height is equal to horizontal gutter height. Please see this snapshot of an example document of my design:
Come in tables. And I totally agree: not only must table rows heights match a multiple of baseline grid lines, but the insertion and exit points (top and bottom "edges") of the table must also occur on baseline guides. There should be a check box in some table styling dialog which allows you to force the table top edge, bottom edge and row divisions to snap to baseline grid. In this mode, the rows heights would automatically grow according to contents, but only in steps of baseline grid dimension.
Columns could work the same way, although there is no real equivalent to baseline grid in the vertical domain. And, from experience, it's not very often that I can keep column widths modular throughout a substantial book. Here I often find myself crying for flexibility and resolve to odd values.
Now, about what happens with baseline grid inside cells. There is something wrong at the very root of how InDesign implements, and even names this modular grid. It should not be called "baseline grid", because these divisions should not represent actual text baseline (at least not how it's implied at this time). Instead it should be called "text setting grid", or "grid text subdivision", or something. Please look at this snapshot:
The "baseline grid" is only completely useful when it encapsulates the complete character height, with ascenders and descenders — just like physical upper and lower limits of a composed lead type line! It's the only thing which makes sense, because the way it is now, the "baseline grid" cannot be used to align graphics with bodies of text. Adobe need to pay more attention to Josef-Müller Brockmann and they would make things the right way here.
So, to be complete (and it would make InDesign 1.5× more powerful to my eyes, not a small feat for a 30+ y.o. piece of software) :
- The "Create guides..." menu function should also determine "baseline grid" as a module of the design grid: one could choose a number of rows, and then a number of "text setting grid" lines per row, which would immediately make the whole spread entirely modular! The present disconnect between page design grid rows and baseline grid doesn't make sense (it doesn't to me, anyway; maybe there could be an option for the two values to be linked in a clever manner like this). These values are related if you think for only a minute.
- This baseline grid cannot be the "text baseline", i.e. the lines on which characters "sit"; not sure how to solve this, but maybe simply by the opportunity to set a vertical offset from the baseline grid (or "text setting grid") to place this virtual "sitting" line a bit above the visual, snapping guide line, to achieve the geometry shown in the previous image. What I always do now is, once I found my page design grid and determined type size, I tweak InDesign's baseline grid accordingly to set its start point with a determined offset, so that I achieve the described behavior (it's the case in the first image above; the lines displayed are not from the actual baseline grid, they're "my" set of guides; the baseline grid is hidden and actually offset a little upwards). I actually never use InDesign's baseline grid visually (it's always hidden), because I only need the snap of my own guides to properly align graphics with text (à la Müller-Brockmann).
- This would solve the question of how text is set inside cells; the exception here would be cells where text is aligned in the middle, vertically, with a parity mismatch between modular cell height and the number of text lines it contains; like the example situation where the cell has a height of 4 "text setting grid" lines, but only contains 3 lines of text — then the text should be set halfway across "text setting grid" lines. Maybe simply an option to determine this, like "Cell text baseline grid snap 1:1 or 1:2".
AdChoices