Working FOGRA39 vs Document FOGRA39 - what are their differences?
- December 10, 2022
- 2 replies
- 3538 views
Dear all,
I have a question about colour profiles and how they render in printing.
I have just finished to design the new cover of my musical editions which will hopefully go into print and distribution by the beginning of 2023. The colour of the element on the cover is set up as CMYK (0, 82, 72, 55), and when I export it for printing, the profile is set up to use Working FOGRA39. The printer, though, asked me to use PDF/X-3:2003, which defaults to Document FOGRA39. The result I get both in the PDF on-screen and in the printed proof that I got is noticeably darker than the one using Working FOGRA39.
Why is this so?
I recently read the article by David Blatner on CMYK vs RGB, where he suggested using RGB for design, and then use the profile requested by the printer to output the proper colour. In this case, the base RGB was 116,21,33 which, already on screen, is noticeably different from the CMYK option I started with. The source for all these values was this: https://www.color-name.com/dark-ruby.color
Attached are the two output PDFs, "try9a" is using Working FOGRA39, while "try9b" is using Document FOGRA39. In the InDesign document, CMYK (0, 82, 72, 55) looks more like "try9b", but I like more the output of "try9a". How can I get to that colour already from the start?
Please, assume I have no idea how a professional printer actually work, so ELI5!
Thank you very much
